Remember When Democrats Used To Support Religious Freedom?

Stephanie

Diamond Member
Jul 11, 2004
70,230
10,864
2,040
Well of course. It was a Democrat. a video at the site of the narrow minded far right Clinton signing this

SNIP:
March 26, 2015 By Bill Clinton
Remarks on Signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
November 16, 1993

Thank you very much, Mr. Vice President, for those fine remarks and to the Members of Congress, the chaplains of the House and the Senate, and to all of you who worked so hard to help this day become a reality. Let me especially thank the Coalition for the Free Exercise of Religion for the central role they played in drafting this legislation and working so hard for its passage.

It is interesting to note, as the Vice President said, what a broad coalition of Americans came together to make this bill a reality; interesting to note that that coalition produced a 97-to3 vote in the United States Senate and a bill that had such broad support it was adopted on a voice vote in the House. I’m told that, as many of the people in the coalition worked together across ideological and religious lines, some new friendships were formed and some new trust was established, which shows, I suppose, that the power of God is such that even in the legislative process miracles can happen. [Laughter]


We all have a shared desire here to protect perhaps the most precious of all American liberties, religious freedom. Usually the signing of legislation by a President is a ministerial act, often a quiet ending to a turbulent legislative process. Today this event assumes a more majestic quality because of our ability together to affirm the historic role that people of faith have played in the history of this country and the constitutional protections those who profess and express their faith have always demanded and cherished.

ALL of it here:
Remember When Democrats Supported Religious Freedom
 
Are you serious?

It was liberals who invented it. They believe in freedom so deeply, they formed an entire country around it and later wrote something called the Bill of Rights to protect it.

Then along comes modern-day Republicans with their sharia laws based on their version of the bible.
 
Are you serious?

It was liberals who invented it. They believe in freedom so deeply, they formed an entire country around it and later wrote something called the Bill of Rights to protect it.

Then along comes modern-day Republicans with their sharia laws based on their version of the bible.


The blow back on these American taliban cretins is just starting
 
Well of course. It was a Democrat. a video at the site of the narrow minded far right Clinton signing this

SNIP:
March 26, 2015 By Bill Clinton
Remarks on Signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993

Actually, the RFRA was a disaster. What it lead to was a bunch of lawsuits, most of them from Convicts, claiming religious exemptions from laws.

It led to a bunch of people suing businesses claiming that their smoking of pot and peyote was "religious" in nature and they couldnt' be fired.
 
It's kind of sad to watch the Homophobes, now having LOST the argument on gay marriage, now cling to this last little bit of homophobia instead of just coming to terms with it.

Just bake the fucking cake and shut up.
 
Well of course. It was a Democrat. a video at the site of the narrow minded far right Clinton signing this

SNIP:
March 26, 2015 By Bill Clinton
Remarks on Signing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
November 16, 1993

Thank you very much, Mr. Vice President, for those fine remarks and to the Members of Congress, the chaplains of the House and the Senate, and to all of you who worked so hard to help this day become a reality. Let me especially thank the Coalition for the Free Exercise of Religion for the central role they played in drafting this legislation and working so hard for its passage.

It is interesting to note, as the Vice President said, what a broad coalition of Americans came together to make this bill a reality; interesting to note that that coalition produced a 97-to3 vote in the United States Senate and a bill that had such broad support it was adopted on a voice vote in the House. I’m told that, as many of the people in the coalition worked together across ideological and religious lines, some new friendships were formed and some new trust was established, which shows, I suppose, that the power of God is such that even in the legislative process miracles can happen. [Laughter]


We all have a shared desire here to protect perhaps the most precious of all American liberties, religious freedom. Usually the signing of legislation by a President is a ministerial act, often a quiet ending to a turbulent legislative process. Today this event assumes a more majestic quality because of our ability together to affirm the historic role that people of faith have played in the history of this country and the constitutional protections those who profess and express their faith have always demanded and cherished.

ALL of it here:
Remember When Democrats Supported Religious Freedom

The bill was ruled unconstitutional.
 
Didn't we hear that a fundie bakery went belly up when they discriminated against gays? Their choice.

Force the fake christians to put up signs in their windows that they belong to a hate group and discriminate. That way, people have the choice of supporting sharia law or taking their business elsewhere. The backlash will end up being an increase in sales for some businesses.

star%20of%20david.jpg
 
They're very tolerant, even supportive, of the PC-protected religion.

Yes, when you point out that we shouldn't be getting involved with people on the other side of the planet, it's bcause you "Support the PC religion",

not that you think it's foolish to throw away lives litigating religious arguments that have gone on for thousands of years and have nothing to do with us.
 
Frankly I'm getting a little tired of your dishonesty Stephanie. You know damn well that Clinton never meant for that law to apply to Republicans. :p (any more than laws against sexual assault were meant to apply to Clinton) (or transparency laws were meant to apply to Other-Clinton)

It's well past time for you to get on the "Celebrate Conformity" train with our moral and intelectual betters on the Left. If you don't they will come for your job next!

National Review

"Bob Hope, touring the world in the year or so after the passage of the 1975 Consenting Adult Sex Bill:

“I’ve just flown in from California, where they’ve made homosexuality legal. I thought I’d get out before they make it compulsory.”

For Hope, this was an oddly profound gag, discerning even at the dawn of the Age of Tolerance that there was something inherently coercive about the enterprise. Soon it would be insufficient merely to be “tolerant” — warily accepting, blithely indifferent, mildly amused, tepidly supportive, according to taste. The forces of “tolerance” would become intolerant of anything less than full-blown celebratory approval."

Celebrate Conformity SteynOnline

"...free speech was certainly a right, but it was merely one in a whole range of competing rights - such as "equality" and "diversity" - that needed to be "balanced". What the "balancing" boils down to is that you get fired if you are an apostate from the new progressive groupthink."
 
It's kind of sad to watch the Homophobes, now having LOST the argument on gay marriage, now cling to this last little bit of homophobia instead of just coming to terms with it.

Just bake the fucking cake and shut up.

Fupcake.jpg


As Christian bakers ordered to provide wedding cakes for gay nuptials and many others well understand, America’s much-vaunted “freedom of religion” is dwindling down to something you can exercise behind closed doors in the privacy of your own abode or at a specialist venue for those of such tastes for an hour or so on Sunday morning, but when you enter the public square you have to leave your faith back home hanging in the closet.

Read more at: National Review
 
It's kind of sad to watch the Homophobes, now having LOST the argument on gay marriage, now cling to this last little bit of homophobia instead of just coming to terms with it.

Just bake the fucking cake and shut up.

View attachment 38703

As Christian bakers ordered to provide wedding cakes for gay nuptials and many others well understand, America’s much-vaunted “freedom of religion” is dwindling down to something you can exercise behind closed doors in the privacy of your own abode or at a specialist venue for those of such tastes for an hour or so on Sunday morning, but when you enter the public square you have to leave your faith back home hanging in the closet.

Read more at: National Review


So churches are now called "specialist venues". LOL

Fact is, there is no place where you cannot practice your religion. You just can't force others to practice your religion.
 
Didn't we hear that a fundie bakery went belly up when they discriminated against gays? Their choice.

Force the fake christians to put up signs in their windows that they belong to a hate group and discriminate. That way, people have the choice of supporting sharia law or taking their business elsewhere. The backlash will end up being an increase in sales for some businesses.

star%20of%20david.jpg

Scratch a liberal, find a faciest. it's the fundamental (fundi?) totalitarian impulse of the Progressive. Hey, that's why they love the Islamic faith and ceed it the respect they lack for the other Western Religions I guess.

Read more at: National Review

"In the broader sense, it’s totalitarian. While American gays were stuffing and mounting the duck hunter in their trophy room, the Prince of Wales was celebrating Advent with Christian refugees from the Middle East, and noting that the land in which Christ and Christianity were born is now the region boasting “the lowest concentration of Christians in the world — just four percent of the population.” It will be three, and two, and one percent soon enough, for there is a totalitarian impulse in resurgent Islam — and not just in Araby. A few miles from Buckingham Palace, Muslims in London’s East End are now sufficiently confident to go around warning local shopkeepers to cease selling alcohol. In theory, you might still enjoy the right to sell beer in Tower Hamlets or be a practicing Christian in Iraq, but in reality not so much."


nazinoparty.jpg
 
The bill was ruled unconstitutional.

No, it was only ruled unconstitutional in its application to states. It remains in effect for the federal government, and was the pivotal element that enabled the decision in the Hobby Lobby case to differ from the precedent of Employment Division v Smith.
 
As Christian bakers ordered to provide wedding cakes for gay nuptials and many others well understand, America’s much-vaunted “freedom of religion” is dwindling down to something you can exercise behind closed doors in the privacy of your own abode or at a specialist venue for those of such tastes for an hour or so on Sunday morning, but when you enter the public square you have to leave your faith back home hanging in the closet.

Read more at: National Review

And that would be a bad thing, why?

Frankly,
 
Are you serious?

It was liberals who invented it. They believe in freedom so deeply, they formed an entire country around it and later wrote something called the Bill of Rights to protect it.

Then along comes modern-day Republicans with their sharia laws based on their version of the bible.

They weren't Liberals Muttly, you have those scum confused with Libertarians!
 
Low information leftie memory only goes back to yesterday's Huffington blog. You gotta wonder about the radical left that cares more about the feelings of pervert hairy men in dresses than they care about freedom of religion. One of the uptight outraged corporations that threatened to leave Indiana does business primarily in China. Do they think the human rights situation in China is better than Indiana? It's all about hypocrisy and fake outrage generated by the left wing media who still think the Boy Scouts of America are evil because they reserve the right to discriminate against overt homosexuals who want to play with little boys.
 
As Christian bakers ordered to provide wedding cakes for gay nuptials and many others well understand, America’s much-vaunted “freedom of religion” is dwindling down to something you can exercise behind closed doors in the privacy of your own abode or at a specialist venue for those of such tastes for an hour or so on Sunday morning, but when you enter the public square you have to leave your faith back home hanging in the closet.

Read more at: National Review

And that would be a bad thing, why?

Frankly,
As Christian bakers ordered to provide wedding cakes for gay nuptials and many others well understand, America’s much-vaunted “freedom of religion” is dwindling down to something you can exercise behind closed doors in the privacy of your own abode or at a specialist venue for those of such tastes for an hour or so on Sunday morning, but when you enter the public square you have to leave your faith back home hanging in the closet.

Read more at: National Review

And that would be a bad thing, why?

Frankly,

The impossibility of neutrality is not just totalitarian, it's frankly quite boring. Being tolerent should be enough and forced celebratory approval is a creepy step way over the line.
 
Are you serious?

It was liberals who invented it. They believe in freedom so deeply, they formed an entire country around it and later wrote something called the Bill of Rights to protect it.

Then along comes modern-day Republicans with their sharia laws based on their version of the bible.


The people you cite were Classical Liberals, and they had virtually nothing in common with the Progressive nihilism you practice.
 

Forum List

Back
Top