Well, he is strictly responsible, no matter who or what wrote it, same as if he had human speechwriters. Still Nat, your point is well taken, and is an important on, if not for now but definitely for the future, less legislators actually do become just a "middle man" for the AI overseer. If you feel the creep alarm senses going up your spine for this, where he proposed the legislation, how do you feel about speeches by all the Presidential candidates coming up? Is it possible for AI to gage the reception based on extensive polling views, sentiments, susceptibility to delivery of and best use of propaganda, which is in every campaign speech we've ever heard, already, and tailor it to the audience? It is a creepy thought. He who controls the algorithms controls the world?