Release the Massie Files!

[Seymour Flops]

Donald Trump has a documented history of using demeaning language, personal insults, and aggressive body language toward women who challenge or criticize him. These actions are frequently characterized by critics, psychologists, and journalists as bullying [15, 21]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Verbal and Personal Attacks
Trump often targets women's appearances, intelligence, or emotional state: [1]

• Insulting Labels: He has publicly called women “fat pigs,” “dogs,” “slobs,” and “disgusting animals” [3, 4, 10].
• Targeting Journalists: He has a pattern of berating female reporters during press briefings and on social media:
  • Rachel Scott (ABC): Called her “obnoxious” and “terrible” after she asked challenging questions [2, 8].
  • Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg): Barked “Quiet, piggy” at her while she pressed him on the Jeffrey Epstein case [2, 17].
  • Kaitlan Collins (CNN): Referred to her as “stupid and nasty” in social media posts [2, 8].
  • Megyn Kelly (formerly Fox News): Following a 2015 debate, he suggested her aggressive questioning was due to her menstrual cycle [12, 35].
• “Nasty” Archetype: Trump frequently uses the word “nasty” to describe women who oppose him, a term critics argue is used to disempower or dehumanize them [7, 8]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Physical Intimidation and Harassment [1]
Observers have also highlighted non-verbal tactics used to exert dominance:

• Debate Behavior: During the 2016 debates, he was observed “lurking” behind Hillary Clinton and entering her personal space [30].
• Aggressive Gestures: He often uses barrier signals (palms out) and pointing to intimidate during interactions [29, 30].
• Workplace Harassment: Former campaign staffers have filed lawsuits alleging a culture of harassment and bullying, including the use of strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to suppress critics.

Wow, you truly cannot help yourself.Can you?

Now we can start documenting Massie's history. Is there something wrong with that?

 

[HikerGuy83]

It's about how a politician treats women. You started it.

It's about Massie's alleged cover up.

Stop lying.

 

[Dante]

Republicans hate men who bully women...

You are one demented dope:

Donald Trump has a documented history of using demeaning language, personal insults, and aggressive body language toward women who challenge or criticize him. These actions are frequently characterized by critics, psychologists, and journalists as bullying [15, 21]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Verbal and Personal Attacks
Trump often targets women's appearances, intelligence, or emotional state: [1]

• Insulting Labels: He has publicly called women “fat pigs,” “dogs,” “slobs,” and “disgusting animals” [3, 4, 10].
• Targeting Journalists: He has a pattern of berating female reporters during press briefings and on social media:
  • Rachel Scott (ABC): Called her “obnoxious” and “terrible” after she asked challenging questions [2, 8].
  • Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg): Barked “Quiet, piggy” at her while she pressed him on the Jeffrey Epstein case [2, 17].
  • Kaitlan Collins (CNN): Referred to her as “stupid and nasty” in social media posts [2, 8].
  • Megyn Kelly (formerly Fox News): Following a 2015 debate, he suggested her aggressive questioning was due to her menstrual cycle [12, 35].
• “Nasty” Archetype: Trump frequently uses the word “nasty” to describe women who oppose him, a term critics argue is used to disempower or dehumanize them [7, 8]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Physical Intimidation and Harassment [1]
Observers have also highlighted non-verbal tactics used to exert dominance:

• Debate Behavior: During the 2016 debates, he was observed “lurking” behind Hillary Clinton and entering her personal space [30].
• Aggressive Gestures: He often uses barrier signals (palms out) and pointing to intimidate during interactions [29, 30].
• Workplace Harassment: Former campaign staffers have filed lawsuits alleging a culture of harassment and bullying, including the use of strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to suppress critics.

crazy

 

[The Duke]

You are one demented dope:

Donald Trump has a documented history of using demeaning language, personal insults, and aggressive body language toward women who challenge or criticize him. These actions are frequently characterized by critics, psychologists, and journalists as bullying [15, 21]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Verbal and Personal Attacks
Trump often targets women's appearances, intelligence, or emotional state: [1]

• Insulting Labels: He has publicly called women “fat pigs,” “dogs,” “slobs,” and “disgusting animals” [3, 4, 10].
• Targeting Journalists: He has a pattern of berating female reporters during press briefings and on social media:
  • Rachel Scott (ABC): Called her “obnoxious” and “terrible” after she asked challenging questions [2, 8].
  • Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg): Barked “Quiet, piggy” at her while she pressed him on the Jeffrey Epstein case [2, 17].
  • Kaitlan Collins (CNN): Referred to her as “stupid and nasty” in social media posts [2, 8].
  • Megyn Kelly (formerly Fox News): Following a 2015 debate, he suggested her aggressive questioning was due to her menstrual cycle [12, 35].
• “Nasty” Archetype: Trump frequently uses the word “nasty” to describe women who oppose him, a term critics argue is used to disempower or dehumanize them [7, 8]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Physical Intimidation and Harassment [1]
Observers have also highlighted non-verbal tactics used to exert dominance:

• Debate Behavior: During the 2016 debates, he was observed “lurking” behind Hillary Clinton and entering her personal space [30].
• Aggressive Gestures: He often uses barrier signals (palms out) and pointing to intimidate during interactions [29, 30].
• Workplace Harassment: Former campaign staffers have filed lawsuits alleging a culture of harassment and bullying, including the use of strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to suppress critics.

Helping, you are not, Dainty.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Is he a terrible team player? Yes.

From that same tweet...

''His maverick act cripples govt by blocking key spending/tax bills, fueling gridlock & weakening GOP momentum''

I, for one, appreciate that he's not on a tax and spend team.

 

[Natural Citizen]

More ''Team spirit'' that the statesman correctly rejects on behalf of his actual constituency rather than the demands and foolish, very naive expectations of the establishment and foreign-first mouthpieces...



Could keep going...

 

[Natural Citizen]

 

[Natural Citizen]

 

[Concerned American]

You don't expect the Legacy media to throw one of their own under a bus, do you?

Or are you laboring under the impression that the Legacy media is somehow an honest broker of information?

Ironic that all of these folks still crowing about unsubstantiated Trump allegations, choose to ignore Massie and, of all people, Swallwell. Scumbag trolls.

 

[Concerned American]

You are one demented dope:

Donald Trump has a documented history of using demeaning language, personal insults, and aggressive body language toward women who challenge or criticize him. These actions are frequently characterized by critics, psychologists, and journalists as bullying [15, 21]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Verbal and Personal Attacks
Trump often targets women's appearances, intelligence, or emotional state: [1]

• Insulting Labels: He has publicly called women “fat pigs,” “dogs,” “slobs,” and “disgusting animals” [3, 4, 10].
• Targeting Journalists: He has a pattern of berating female reporters during press briefings and on social media:
  • Rachel Scott (ABC): Called her “obnoxious” and “terrible” after she asked challenging questions [2, 8].
  • Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg): Barked “Quiet, piggy” at her while she pressed him on the Jeffrey Epstein case [2, 17].
  • Kaitlan Collins (CNN): Referred to her as “stupid and nasty” in social media posts [2, 8].
  • Megyn Kelly (formerly Fox News): Following a 2015 debate, he suggested her aggressive questioning was due to her menstrual cycle [12, 35].
• “Nasty” Archetype: Trump frequently uses the word “nasty” to describe women who oppose him, a term critics argue is used to disempower or dehumanize them [7, 8]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Physical Intimidation and Harassment [1]
Observers have also highlighted non-verbal tactics used to exert dominance:

• Debate Behavior: During the 2016 debates, he was observed “lurking” behind Hillary Clinton and entering her personal space [30].
• Aggressive Gestures: He often uses barrier signals (palms out) and pointing to intimidate during interactions [29, 30].
• Workplace Harassment: Former campaign staffers have filed lawsuits alleging a culture of harassment and bullying, including the use of strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to suppress critics.

Off topic. Reported

 

[Seymour Flops]

From that same tweet...

''His maverick act cripples govt by blocking key spending/tax bills, fueling gridlock & weakening GOP momentum''

Very well put!

I, for one, appreciate that he's not on a tax and spend team.

Of course he is. His performative obstructionism hasn't saved the taxpayers a a single penny.

But that doesn't really matter for this thread. what matters here is that we honor and believe his victim(s).

 

[Dante]

Republicans hate men who bully women...

You are one demented dope:

Donald Trump has a documented history of using demeaning language, personal insults, and aggressive body language toward women who challenge or criticize him. These actions are frequently characterized by critics, psychologists, and journalists as bullying [15, 21]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Verbal and Personal Attacks
Trump often targets women's appearances, intelligence, or emotional state: [1]

• Insulting Labels: He has publicly called women “fat pigs,” “dogs,” “slobs,” and “disgusting animals” [3, 4, 10].
• Targeting Journalists: He has a pattern of berating female reporters during press briefings and on social media:
  • Rachel Scott (ABC): Called her “obnoxious” and “terrible” after she asked challenging questions [2, 8].
  • Catherine Lucey (Bloomberg): Barked “Quiet, piggy” at her while she pressed him on the Jeffrey Epstein case [2, 17].
  • Kaitlan Collins (CNN): Referred to her as “stupid and nasty” in social media posts [2, 8].
  • Megyn Kelly (formerly Fox News): Following a 2015 debate, he suggested her aggressive questioning was due to her menstrual cycle [12, 35].
• “Nasty” Archetype: Trump frequently uses the word “nasty” to describe women who oppose him, a term critics argue is used to disempower or dehumanize them [7, 8]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Physical Intimidation and Harassment [1]
Observers have also highlighted non-verbal tactics used to exert dominance:

• Debate Behavior: During the 2016 debates, he was observed “lurking” behind Hillary Clinton and entering her personal space [30].
• Aggressive Gestures: He often uses barrier signals (palms out) and pointing to intimidate during interactions [29, 30].
• Workplace Harassment: Former campaign staffers have filed lawsuits alleging a culture of harassment and bullying, including the use of strict non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to suppress critics.

Off topic. Reported

 

[Natural Citizen]

Very well put!

Of course he is. His performative obstructionism hasn't saved the taxpayers a a single penny.

You think a tax and spend policy is the way to strength?

How very ''conservative'' of you.

Me, I'll take the obstructionist over the outright thief...

 

[Dante]

Off topic. Reported

Wrong. You are acting a bit retarded.

 

[Seymour Flops]

You think a tax and spend policy is the way to strength?

How very ''conservative'' of you.

Me, I'll take the obstructionist over the outright thief...

Please stop trying to distract from the Massie Files!

 

[marvin martian]

Epstein Files first.

Are you actually fangirling on James Comey??

 

[Natural Citizen]

Please stop trying to distract from the Massie Files!

I snipped an excerpt from the tweet that you, yourself, posted in the OP.

Seems your brood is upset because the statesman isnlt on the tax and spend team.

The truth stings, don't it?

So that you're aware, here's all of that so-called ''team momentum'' that your tax and spend policy accomplishes...

 

[Natural Citizen]

I, for one, am glad that the statesman is not a so-called''team player.''

Because ''the team'' sucks. And it's destroying our once great and prosperous Republic.

And for what? For whose benefit?

It sure as heck isn't of any benefit to the real average American who gets stuck with the bill while the special interest beneficiaries, both foreign and domestic, who observably, by their actions, hold no meaningful allegiance to the nation, its prosperity or the constitution, while laughing all the way to the central bank.

 

[BackAgain]

LOL this story is only on X and redstatenation

Hm. Does that make it false in your estimation?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Here is the victim:



At least now we know why Massie would never need to use to congressional hush fund. He maintains his own "Cow Money" fund of unreported cash.