rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 297,951
- 220,161
- 3,615
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent but shows they care
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When quoting, you should keep original grammar and spelling."S" denotes plural in English. "'S" denotes possession. (Which as you know is 9/10ths of the law.)
Anyway if you want to discuss conservatives, you use s by itself to denote a large quantity of intelligent and honorable folks.
Use of the apostrophe denotes possession. Obama's depression, Reid's fecklessness.
we are seeing too many threads where this point is confused. Folks are making threads that say "Conservative's are morans" and the like. Grammar mistakes like this sort of poke holes in your argument.
Just saying
![]()
Do you know, you spelled MORON wrong
I am assuming that's the word you meant......anywho.....sorry to nitpick![]()
Grammer mistakes do not poke holes in the logic of your argument.
They merely make it harder for the reader to know what your argument really is.
I once had a boss who lived to find fault with staff's insignificant and trivial errors, be they in memos or other documents, both in house and out. When updating policy or preparing communicatons with agencies or organizations where detail was particularly important, and I didn't want him messing with substance, I always made a few "S" 'mistakes' and spelling errors. He'd point these out and by feeding his needs we avoided ending up with a camel and not the horse we needed.
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent but shows they care
"S" denotes plural in English. "'S" denotes possession. (Which as you know is 9/10ths of the law.)
Anyway if you want to discuss conservatives, you use s by itself to denote a large quantity of intelligent and honorable folks.
Use of the apostrophe denotes possession. Obama's depression, Reid's fecklessness.
we are seeing too many threads where this point is confused. Folks are making threads that say "Conservative's are morans" and the like. Grammar mistakes like this sort of poke holes in your argument.
Just saying
![]()
If we're discussing grammar peeves, very few people know the rule of proper placement of quotation marks, especially Rule #1, here:
Quotation Marks | Punctuation Rules
But neither is as important as the ability to put together a cohesive sentence, in my opinion. Spelling and punctuation errors can be forgiven usually; typos definitely forgiven.
That's interesting, I was taught if quotations are used within a part of a sentence the punctuation always went outside of the quote but if the quote was the whole sentence, or series of sentences the punctuations went inside the quotes.
"S" denotes plural in English. "'S" denotes possession. (Which as you know is 9/10ths of the law.)
Anyway if you want to discuss conservatives, you use s by itself to denote a large quantity of intelligent and honorable folks.
Use of the apostrophe denotes possession. Obama's depression, Reid's fecklessness.
we are seeing too many threads where this point is confused. Folks are making threads that say "Conservative's are morans" and the like. Grammar mistakes like this sort of poke holes in your argument.
Just saying
![]()
If we're discussing grammar peeves, very few people know the rule of proper placement of quotation marks, especially Rule #1, here:
Quotation Marks | Punctuation Rules
But neither is as important as the ability to put together a cohesive sentence, in my opinion. Spelling and punctuation errors can be forgiven usually; typos definitely forgiven.
She's wrong.
Wrong in the sense that not every editor agrees with the theory that all punctuation marks belong within the quotes, at least.
The rule for English is this: If it WORKS to convey the meaning to your reader, it's right.
Yeah, yeah I know that's not what you English teachers probably told you.
They were wrong.
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent but shows they care
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent but shows they care
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent, but it shows they care.
![]()
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent but shows they care
I love people who correct grammar. It not only shows they are more intelligent, but it shows they care.
![]()
Aha. Another rule is that a comma is not necessary unless there is a noun and a verb in the two clauses. But it's also okay to put one in (for clarity). So you're both right.
"S" denotes plural in English. "'S" denotes possession. (Which as you know is 9/10ths of the law.)
Anyway if you want to discuss conservatives, you use s by itself to denote a large quantity of intelligent and honorable folks.
Use of the apostrophe denotes possession. Obama's depression, Reid's fecklessness.
we are seeing too many threads where this point is confused. Folks are making threads that say "Conservative's are morans" and the like. Grammar mistakes like this sort of poke holes in your argument.
Just saying
![]()
"S" denotes plural in English. "'S" denotes possession. (Which as you know is 9/10ths of the law.)
Anyway if you want to discuss conservatives, you use s by itself to denote a large quantity of intelligent and honorable folks.
Use of the apostrophe denotes possession. Obama's depression, Reid's fecklessness.
we are seeing too many threads where this point is confused. Folks are making threads that say "Conservative's are morans" and the like. Grammar mistakes like this sort of poke holes in your argument.
Just saying
![]()
what about s'?...as in morons' ?
"S" denotes plural in English. "'S" denotes possession. (Which as you know is 9/10ths of the law.)
Anyway if you want to discuss conservatives, you use s by itself to denote a large quantity of intelligent and honorable folks.
Use of the apostrophe denotes possession. Obama's depression, Reid's fecklessness.
we are seeing too many threads where this point is confused. Folks are making threads that say "Conservative's are morans" and the like. Grammar mistakes like this sort of poke holes in your argument.
Just saying
![]()
what about s'?...as in morons' ?
Such as the morons' echo chamber? As opposed to the moron's echo chamber. The former is an echo chamber for all the morons. The latter to signify that you own the echo chamber. Clear?
what about s'?...as in morons' ?
Such as the morons' echo chamber? As opposed to the moron's echo chamber. The former is an echo chamber for all the morons. The latter to signify that you own the echo chamber. Clear?
hey, when you absolutely positively need to know, call an expert on Morons...thxx!![]()
It's funny when liberals are so arrogant they think they can define who is and who isn't conservative.![]()
Since we are yapping about grammar, my biggest pet peeve is when people do not use the word -their, there, they're- properly.
They will use: "It's there turn to drive." *ugh* (proper use would be "It's their turn to drive.")
Or....."Maybe their not home." *another ugh* (proper use would be "Maybe they're not home.")
That shit drives me bat shit crazy ~LoL~
Lose the unmerited arrogance and the echo chamber shit and I'll tell you.It's funny when liberals are so arrogant they think they can define who is and who isn't conservative.![]()
Actually I've asked many times for echo chamber members to define that question. The answer seems to escape them. As a member in good standing how do you define a conservative?
If you have no definition of "conservative", you have no basis for deciding who is a faux conservative.I won't define what a conservative is, never have, I have characterized 'conservatives' self identified 'conservatives', faux conservatives in very unflatterng words (as you known from personal experience).
Yeah, yeah, mandatory Christianity, camps for the atheists, yadda yadda.So tell us, what are the characteristics of a real conservative - cause echo chamber members are far fight and have nothing in common with the root word, to conserve. The New Right is radical and hopes to remake America into theocratic plutocracy.