Those refusals are due to sanitation, health and/or safety, not because someone doesn't like the color or lifestyle of another person. No shirts, no shoes, no service does not indicate racial, religious, gender, age, etc., bias. Not allowing people in with guns or removing people who are drunk or violent goes to safety issues--not biases about gender, race, etc.
But in Liberal logic this is justice....................
Store policy states they don't bake confederate cakes..........but an ISIS cake is okay........then your side says it is about Justice........
What utter HORSE SHIT you leftists shovel........
Sure, but how many gay people will willingly sign a form declaring that they are straight, only to gain access to an organization that doesn't want them and from which they get no benefit that cannot be gotten elsewhere?
Yeah...that's what they said after desegregation...and a lot of "private" clubs did crop up after that. There's one huge difference between race and sexual orientation though...you can't tell someone's sexual orientation just by looking at them. Good luck trying to keep your "members" straight.
Sure, but how many gay people will willingly sign a form declaring that they are straight, only to gain access to an organization that doesn't want them and from which they get no benefit that cannot be gotten elsewhere?
Yeah...that's what they said after desegregation...and a lot of "private" clubs did crop up after that. There's one huge difference between race and sexual orientation though...you can't tell someone's sexual orientation just by looking at them. Good luck trying to keep your "members" straight.
You also got benefits you could not get anywhere else.Sure, but how many gay people will willingly sign a form declaring that they are straight, only to gain access to an organization that doesn't want them and from which they get no benefit that cannot be gotten elsewhere?
Yeah...that's what they said after desegregation...and a lot of "private" clubs did crop up after that. There's one huge difference between race and sexual orientation though...you can't tell someone's sexual orientation just by looking at them. Good luck trying to keep your "members" straight.
Yeah, we did it to join the military for decades.
You also got benefits you could not get anywhere else.Sure, but how many gay people will willingly sign a form declaring that they are straight, only to gain access to an organization that doesn't want them and from which they get no benefit that cannot be gotten elsewhere?
Yeah...that's what they said after desegregation...and a lot of "private" clubs did crop up after that. There's one huge difference between race and sexual orientation though...you can't tell someone's sexual orientation just by looking at them. Good luck trying to keep your "members" straight.
Yeah, we did it to join the military for decades.
You also got benefits you could not get anywhere else.Sure, but how many gay people will willingly sign a form declaring that they are straight, only to gain access to an organization that doesn't want them and from which they get no benefit that cannot be gotten elsewhere?
Yeah...that's what they said after desegregation...and a lot of "private" clubs did crop up after that. There's one huge difference between race and sexual orientation though...you can't tell someone's sexual orientation just by looking at them. Good luck trying to keep your "members" straight.
Yeah, we did it to join the military for decades.
And there would be "straights only" clubs where benefits could be "gotten" that could not be gotten elsewhere. See how silly your argument gets?
I did not say I would approve of or join such a club. That is your assumption. I merely stated that is one way to avoid serving homosexuals if someone so wished.Good luck with your "straight" private clubs. Your decor will be atrocious.
You also got benefits you could not get anywhere else.Sure, but how many gay people will willingly sign a form declaring that they are straight, only to gain access to an organization that doesn't want them and from which they get no benefit that cannot be gotten elsewhere?Yeah...that's what they said after desegregation...and a lot of "private" clubs did crop up after that. There's one huge difference between race and sexual orientation though...you can't tell someone's sexual orientation just by looking at them. Good luck trying to keep your "members" straight.
Yeah, we did it to join the military for decades.
And there would be "straights only" clubs where benefits could be "gotten" that could not be gotten elsewhere. See how silly your argument gets?
What benefits would a straights only private club that sold baked goods convey that a retail establishment would not?
I did not say I would approve of or join such a club. That is your assumption. I merely stated that is one way to avoid serving homosexuals if someone so wished.Good luck with your "straight" private clubs. Your decor will be atrocious.
It simply doesn't matter if the club was the only bakery for hundreds of miles because there is no legal right to have any retail establishment of any type within any distance. And, pray tell, what kind of cookie can someone not live without?
What benefits would a straights only private club that sold baked goods convey that a retail establishment would not?
I did not say I would approve of or join such a club. That is your assumption. I merely stated that is one way to avoid serving homosexuals if someone so wished.Good luck with your "straight" private clubs. Your decor will be atrocious.
Oh, so now we're getting specific when we play "what if". Well, okay then. "What if" the "private" baker was the only baker for hundreds of miles? What if your "private" baker has a cookie that the gay person can't live without? I mean, if we're playing "what ifs" don't I get some too? Good luck with a "straights only" club. I mean, you have men's golf, what more do you need?
Good point.
