Red States - 150 years of Conservative rule. Why are they such disasters?

right so 8 years of bush = 5 years of obama getting a pass? isn't that the math? :rolleyes:

What do Bush do to stem the tide of manufacturing out this country?

Oh wait..he helped them move out.

Thousands and thousands of plants closed down in those 8 years..and opened up..in China and India.

Now with Obama in? They are coming back.

But not because of Obama..and definitely not because of the obstruction in congress.

Bush did such a great job in turning most of the country into a third world shithole, that it's now cheaper to build here!

Grats man!

Your race to bottom is working!!!

that is so full of slobbering idiocy its hard to know where to begin, so aside from your your diarrhea of the mouth lets just leave it at-


60 years democratic governance, GOP's fault, 6 years of gop and 5 year of obama? ? still their fault...:lol:

you're certifiable, seriously:cuckoo:

Trajan, you are like a drunk who is constantly sick, but swears to god his drinking ain't affecting his health..it's the gamma rays from the guy's satellite dish across the street that's killing ya.

But you are a fun guy for a nickel.

Here's a nickel rummy.

Dance.

:dance: <== DO the Trajan Dance!!
 
Last edited:
Can someone explain it to me? How after 150 years of Conservatives in charge, Red States are such disasters? So right away, they will avoid the question and say, "What about California"? A state that gives twice as much to the Federal Government as the next largest state, Texas.

We all know that nearly every Red State gets more from the Government than they give. The opposite of Blue States.

Which states have the largest number of institutions of higher learning?

Which states are the most polluted?

Which states have the most children with out health care?

We all know the answers to these questions. So why is it? How come when conservatives are in charge, states "fail"? Conservatives have been in charge of Red States for over a hundred years. And how come the more conservatives a state is, the poorer it is?

You want to know what deanie's problem is?

huckfamily.jpg
 
Last edited:
Can someone explain it to me? How after 150 years of Conservatives in charge, Red States are such disasters? So right away, they will avoid the question and say, "What about California"? A state that gives twice as much to the Federal Government as the next largest state, Texas.

We all know that nearly every Red State gets more from the Government than they give. The opposite of Blue States.

Which states have the largest number of institutions of higher learning?

Which states are the most polluted?

Which states have the most children with out health care?

We all know the answers to these questions. So why is it? How come when conservatives are in charge, states "fail"? Conservatives have been in charge of Red States for over a hundred years. And how come the more conservatives a state is, the poorer it is?

Interesting choice of words , "conservative rule". Rule is a big thing with the radical left. In case radical lefties didn't notice there are no permanent "red states" or "blue states" except in their bigoted closed minds. The majority of the people still elect the politicians they like and folks are free to move anywhere they want to (for now). Detroit is still a burned out slum and Chicago is still a murder capital no matter how you spin it.

map1.jpeg


So check out those conservative states on the lower right and tell me how many used to be "liberal".
 
What do Bush do to stem the tide of manufacturing out this country?

Oh wait..he helped them move out.

Thousands and thousands of plants closed down in those 8 years..and opened up..in China and India.

Now with Obama in? They are coming back.

But not because of Obama..and definitely not because of the obstruction in congress.

Bush did such a great job in turning most of the country into a third world shithole, that it's now cheaper to build here!

Grats man!

Your race to bottom is working!!!

that is so full of slobbering idiocy its hard to know where to begin, so aside from your your diarrhea of the mouth lets just leave it at-


60 years democratic governance, GOP's fault, 6 years of gop and 5 year of obama? ? still their fault...:lol:

you're certifiable, seriously:cuckoo:

Trajan, you are like a drunk who is constantly sick, but swears to god his drinking ain't affecting his health..it's the gamma rays from the guy's satellite dish across the street that's killing ya.

But you are a fun guy for a nickel.

Here's a nickel rummy.

Dance.

:dance: <== DO the Trajan Dance!!

whats a matter? the logic to tough for you? thats about what I expect. *shrugs*
 
Maybe the 150 year comparison was intended to bring in the Civil War but only the 20th century is really relevant in a political sense. Almost the entire Country was dark blue during the 30's when FDR promised to end the recession and turned it into a man killing soup-line depression. The South was solid blue during the segregationist years and Al Gore's father, senator Gore was a segregationist.
 
that is so full of slobbering idiocy its hard to know where to begin, so aside from your your diarrhea of the mouth lets just leave it at-


60 years democratic governance, GOP's fault, 6 years of gop and 5 year of obama? ? still their fault...:lol:

you're certifiable, seriously:cuckoo:

Trajan, you are like a drunk who is constantly sick, but swears to god his drinking ain't affecting his health..it's the gamma rays from the guy's satellite dish across the street that's killing ya.

But you are a fun guy for a nickel.

Here's a nickel rummy.

Dance.

:dance: <== DO the Trajan Dance!!

whats a matter? the logic to tough for you? thats about what I expect. *shrugs*

Logic?

You using a thesaurus again?

Okay..try a dictionary next time.

Because logic probably means something different then the meaning you are attaching to it.

As in.."Bartender, I'll have another shot of that logic there..with a beer back".

(PSST Trajan, Logic isn't vodka)
 
Maybe the 150 year comparison was intended to bring in the Civil War but only the 20th century is really relevant in a political sense. Almost the entire Country was dark blue during the 30's when FDR promised to end the recession and turned it into a man killing soup-line depression. The South was solid blue during the segregationist years and Al Gore's father, senator Gore was a segregationist.

The south was never "blue".

They didn't even wear blue during the civil war. They wore grey.

The North wore blue.
 
Trajan, you are like a drunk who is constantly sick, but swears to god his drinking ain't affecting his health..it's the gamma rays from the guy's satellite dish across the street that's killing ya.

But you are a fun guy for a nickel.

Here's a nickel rummy.

Dance.

:dance: <== DO the Trajan Dance!!

whats a matter? the logic to tough for you? thats about what I expect. *shrugs*

Logic?

You using a thesaurus again?

Okay..try a dictionary next time.

Because logic probably means something different then the meaning you are attaching to it.

As in.."Bartender, I'll have another shot of that logic there..with a beer back".

(PSST Trajan, Logic isn't vodka)

you're trying to hard....:lol:
 
Maybe the 150 year comparison was intended to bring in the Civil War but only the 20th century is really relevant in a political sense. Almost the entire Country was dark blue during the 30's when FDR promised to end the recession and turned it into a man killing soup-line depression. The South was solid blue during the segregationist years and Al Gore's father, senator Gore was a segregationist.

The south was never "blue".

They didn't even wear blue during the civil war. They wore grey.

The North wore blue.

Actually, I knew this guy who was one of those Civil War "reenactors". It's a myth that the north wore only blue and the south only grey. It's easy to find out. Google "confederate blue and yankee grey". Pick your source.

However, the south has ALWAYS been conservative. What ever the party affiliation, the south has always been conservative. All that racism, hate and ignorance has really hurt them over the years. They say FDR was such a disaster, yet the north recovered and they never did. And never will. As long as conservative's failed policies remain in charge. And with new technology and more modern opportunity, they will suffer even more. Recent conservative policies in the Carolinas and Georgia among other states will see to it.
 
Maybe the 150 year comparison was intended to bring in the Civil War but only the 20th century is really relevant in a political sense. Almost the entire Country was dark blue during the 30's when FDR promised to end the recession and turned it into a man killing soup-line depression. The South was solid blue during the segregationist years and Al Gore's father, senator Gore was a segregationist.

The south was never "blue".

They didn't even wear blue during the civil war. They wore grey.

The North wore blue.

I guarantee if you could poll every KKK activist back in the turbulent 60's you would find that they were card carrying democrats.
 
Maybe the 150 year comparison was intended to bring in the Civil War but only the 20th century is really relevant in a political sense. Almost the entire Country was dark blue during the 30's when FDR promised to end the recession and turned it into a man killing soup-line depression. The South was solid blue during the segregationist years and Al Gore's father, senator Gore was a segregationist.

The south was never "blue".

They didn't even wear blue during the civil war. They wore grey.

The North wore blue.

I guarantee if you could poll every KKK activist back in the turbulent 60's you would find that they were card carrying democrats.

Yeah...and?

The Republicans started out as the Liberal wing of the Whig party.

Up until very recently there have been conservative Democrats and Liberal Republicans.

The difference between the parties basically have been the Republicans favored the rich and Democrats were populists.

Believe it or not..the south is filled with dirt poor conservatives that wanted an even shot at the brass ring. It was back in the day too.
 
The south was never "blue".

They didn't even wear blue during the civil war. They wore grey.

The North wore blue.

I guarantee if you could poll every KKK activist back in the turbulent 60's you would find that they were card carrying democrats.

Yeah...and?

The Republicans started out as the Liberal wing of the Whig party.

Up until very recently there have been conservative Democrats and Liberal Republicans.

The difference between the parties basically have been the Republicans favored the rich and Democrats were populists.

Believe it or not..the south is filled with dirt poor conservatives that wanted an even shot at the brass ring. It was back in the day too.

Believe it or not the once industrial north is full of dirt poor liberals who were promised jobs if they voted for a socialist. They had to settle for food stamps.
 
I guarantee if you could poll every KKK activist back in the turbulent 60's you would find that they were card carrying democrats.

Yeah...and?

The Republicans started out as the Liberal wing of the Whig party.

Up until very recently there have been conservative Democrats and Liberal Republicans.

The difference between the parties basically have been the Republicans favored the rich and Democrats were populists.

Believe it or not..the south is filled with dirt poor conservatives that wanted an even shot at the brass ring. It was back in the day too.

Believe it or not the once industrial north is full of dirt poor liberals who were promised jobs if they voted for a socialist. They had to settle for food stamps.

Baaahahahaha..

That's a real knee slapper..

You read that in an Ayn Rand book or something?
 
The Libs are circling the wagons around their "success" story named Detroit.
They are proud of the fine job of Democrat rule for the last 50 years at least.
Criticize them and they counter with the classic....Well Bush did it first defense...

The topic is Detroit.
And the Democrats own it...
 
Yeah...and?

The Republicans started out as the Liberal wing of the Whig party.

Up until very recently there have been conservative Democrats and Liberal Republicans.

The difference between the parties basically have been the Republicans favored the rich and Democrats were populists.

Believe it or not..the south is filled with dirt poor conservatives that wanted an even shot at the brass ring. It was back in the day too.

Believe it or not the once industrial north is full of dirt poor liberals who were promised jobs if they voted for a socialist. They had to settle for food stamps.

Baaahahahaha..

That's a real knee slapper..

You read that in an Ayn Rand book or something?

Just the headlines "Detroit bankrupt".
 
I prefer Detroit goes belly up.
One down many to go.
It may take forever but the plan is sound.
Federal government to take control of all cities.
It's just a matter of time.
 
Maybe the 150 year comparison was intended to bring in the Civil War but only the 20th century is really relevant in a political sense. Almost the entire Country was dark blue during the 30's when FDR promised to end the recession and turned it into a man killing soup-line depression. The South was solid blue during the segregationist years and Al Gore's father, senator Gore was a segregationist.

The south was never "blue".

They didn't even wear blue during the civil war. They wore grey.

The North wore blue.

I guarantee if you could poll every KKK activist back in the turbulent 60's you would find that they were card carrying democrats.

And now they say that since the Republican Party has adopted all their values and policies, they no longer have a need to exist.
 
The Libs are circling the wagons around their "success" story named Detroit.
They are proud of the fine job of Democrat rule for the last 50 years at least.
Criticize them and they counter with the classic....Well Bush did it first defense...

The topic is Detroit.
And the Democrats own it...

And yet, without the money Red States receive from Blue States, they would be a hopelessly lost third world country. True Story.
 

Forum List

Back
Top