Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
Some people should not own guns.really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.
if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the publicSome people should not own guns.really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.
They should also get the help they need so they can walk about freely.if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the publicSome people should not own guns.really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.
If that's true why nothing about confinement and observation?They should also get the help they need so they can walk about freely.if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the publicSome people should not own guns.really? if they a danger they should be confined for observation but they don't do that.Naaaaah, it's about senility. Or obvious mental illness. When a wife or mother realizes a family member has gone over the edge, there may be an issue about all those guns he's playing with so often. I think it's reasonable to have some recourse to law to deal with such a problem.Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
the accused is free to do whatever they want and pick another weapon to harm with
Again its about firearm confiscation and nothing else.
The law is not intended for gun confiscation; to argue otherwise is a lie.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
That makes no sense.if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public
oh but it is since there is no provision to confine the accused for observationThe law is not intended for gun confiscation; to argue otherwise is a lie.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
if you're not to be trusted with a gun you should not be trusted to live without a caregiver by your side what's your IQ less than 70?That makes no sense.if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public
Another lie – no one’s rights are being ‘deprived.’Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
Do you trust children to carry guns around?if you're not to be trusted with a gun you should not be trusted to live without a caregiver by your side what's your IQ less than 70?
Your ignorance of the law, as well as your dishonesty and lying, comes as no surprise.if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public
LiarAnother lie – no one’s rights are being ‘deprived.’Impractical? how so? when depriving a person of their rights there should be a good reason and if that reason is they are a threat they should be confined and watched for observation.Impractical.Why is there no provision in those laws for observation of the accused?
Therefore your response proves it's all about taking guns
Children have caregivers nextDo you trust children to carry guns around?if you're not to be trusted with a gun you should not be trusted to live without a caregiver by your side what's your IQ less than 70?
that would be part of them getting the help they need which is why we need Universal Healthcare.If that's true why nothing about confinement and observation?
No your blant stupidity on the law is relevantYour ignorance of the law, as well as your dishonesty and lying, comes as no surprise.if they are unable to be trusted with a gun they should not be trusted to walk about freely around the public