Recession is Over- Thanks to the GOP!

[obama2ndterm]

Hopefully, a bunch of them will lose their jobs next November so they can experience the very thing they are wishing upon others. It's only fair that the people who are hoping to see others suffer for their own political gain, are the ones who actually have to suffer being unemployed. That sounds fair to me.

 

[mudwhistle]

Name the actions by Republicans to sway the economy? As usual it is Democrats cleaning up thr huge mess left by Republicans.

Stop spouting garbage. The Dems participated in the downturn of this economy. The mess is their's. Bush and the GOP just didn't do much to stop it.

 

[mudwhistle]

Hopefully, a bunch of them will lose their jobs next November so they can experience the very thing they are wishing upon others. It's only fair that the people who are hoping to see others suffer for their own political gain, are the ones who actually have to suffer being unemployed. That sounds fair to me.

Looks like unless Obama declares Martial Law in Nov. of 2010 the Dems are in serious trouble. So your folks are gonna be moving out of Washington in droves.

And it's the Dems that need us to suffer, not the GOP. Their entitlement policies are geared to that goal. We will all suffer but just not as much as if we had the freedom to experience the benefits that Obama and the Dems are trying to keep from us.

After all, it's the Dems that are anti-business....not the GOP.

Risk is a two edged sword.

 

[obama2ndterm]

Leading conservative economist Bruce Bartlett writes that the Obama-hating town-hall mobs have it wrong—the person they should be angry with left the White House seven months ago: "To a large extent, Obama is only cleaning up messes created by Bush." "Until conservatives once again hold Republicans to the same standard they hold Democrats, they will have no credibility and deserve no respect. They can start building some by admitting to themselves that Bush caused many of the problems they are protesting
underground

 

[The T]

The Bush Administration has stood in favor of tax cuts through thick and thin. In the midst of a booming economy and large projected budget surpluses, President Bush’s top economic policy initiative — both as a candidate in 2000 and upon taking office — was to cut taxes. When the economy slowed, the Bush Administration’s response also was dominated by tax cuts. Now, in the face of yawning deficits and its own pledge to reduce them, the Administration has again put forward large, permanent tax cuts as part of its most recent budget.

This analysis offers a comprehensive review of the Bush Administration’s tax cuts. It assesses their costs, benefits to different income groups, and economic effects to date, as well as down the road. It both synthesizes previous findings about the individual tax measures and includes new findings about their combined effects, using new distributional analyses by the UrbanI nstitute-Brookings Institution Tax Policy Center and fresh cost estimates by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The early returns on the effects of the tax cuts have not been good
By Joel Friedman and Isaac Shapiro

That may be true. IF YOU ARE A COMMIE!

Face it, tax cuts always spur the economy and bring in more revenue. If we had a tax rate of zero percent, we would have flying cars by now.

It's not enough to just say that a tax cut spurs the economy. You have to explain to a progressive liberal why.

In a free society where people have the right to choose the directions their lives take....tax cuts cause the formation of more opportunity and thus greater employment opportunity. When we're allowed to use our own profits to expand businesses we are able to hire more workers. The more that are employed the more that are paying taxes. The more profit....and this is one the Dems refuse to acknowledge.....the more taxes we end up paying. But since we're able to keep more of our profits we can afford it.

Cutting wages and raising taxes causes people to save rather then spend and cut back rather then expand.

Thus, Obama caused the massive unemployment we're seeing today.

And the fact that the people know better where to spend the wages of their sweat equity better than some bureaucrat ever would and that is on an individual basis.

The cookie-cutter ideals of Government do not work for the individual, and tear Society apart as a result. And I think this is what they strive to do.

 

[mudwhistle]

Leading conservative economist Bruce Bartlett writes that the Obama-hating town-hall mobs have it wrong—the person they should be angry with left the White House seven months ago: "To a large extent, Obama is only cleaning up messes created by Bush." "Until conservatives once again hold Republicans to the same standard they hold Democrats, they will have no credibility and deserve no respect. They can start building some by admitting to themselves that Bush caused many of the problems they are protesting
underground

Garbage, garbage, garbage......try thinking for yourself for once.

Obama helped cause the mess and he's trying to keep the blame on someone else for his inablity or lack of desire to clean it up.

 

[obama2ndterm]

You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.Making the poor poorer doesn't help
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.increasing the disparity between wages hurt.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.Hard to save when you don't have anything
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.No, but the highest wge earners should pay the most taxes.The most robust economy was when the rich were taxed at 95%.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.nobody is inciting class hatred,nobody.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.nobody is taking away initiative or independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.- although the poor could use a hand now and then

 

[mudwhistle]

You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.Making the poor poorer doesn't help
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.increasing the disparity between wages hurt.
You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.Hard to save when you don't have anything
You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down.No, but the highest wge earners should pay the most taxes.The most robust economy was when the rich were taxed at 95%.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.nobody is inciting class hatred,nobody.
You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.nobody is taking away initiative or independence.
You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves.- although the poor could use a hand now and then

You really make this way too easy.

I'm going to categorically refute if not destroy your arguments on each and every one of these issues.

1. Making the poor poorer doesn't help- Whom is responsible for the poor remaining poor or causing the middle-class to be poor. Answer: People that dream up programs designed to keep the poor in their current state and programs that cause the middle-class to lose their jobs by the millions.

2. increasing the disparity between wages hurt- Complete equality in pay does only one thing....even out the suffering all of us feel. You need wage earners and wage payers.

3. Hard to save when you don't have anything- By giving everyone the scraps that the government chooses to give out you discourage savings. People learn to accept their plight and just exist not flurrish. There are private relief organizations out there. When more people are wealthy they tend to donate more to these groups. That is why the US gives more then any country in the world.

4. No, but the highest wge earners should pay the most taxes.The most robust economy was when the rich were taxed at 95%.- Care to show me proof of this claim? Turns out when the rich were taxed at 95% we had the worst economy in 30 years...the Carter years. High taxes discourages investment and growth. And by the way, the rich already pay 70% of the taxes already. The poor pay little or none.

5. nobody is inciting class hatred,nobody- This one is too easy. Obama and the Democrats have stepped up the pressure and have been using class-warfare since the first of the year. Remember the AIG bonus debacle? All of those fat-cats collecting huge bonuses. This was broadcast all over the place with the intent on causing hatred for anyone who dares to earn what they are capable of in this country. Busloads of La Rasa and ACORN employees going house to house of Senior AIG board members.

6. nobody is taking away initiative or independence- Another easy one. Obama and the First Lady have been discouraging excellence. Diversity and equality, economic equality across the board is preached constantly, discouraging the rich from earning, punishing businesses that took TARP money by imposing salary caps on earnings. Pushing their "Single-payer" system in the health care debate. Removing options by imposing mandates on anyone who chooses not to get insurance or buy a "Public Option". They want us to have only one option, their shitty option.

7. although the poor could use a hand now and then- The poor already are getting a hand. What Obama and the Democrats want to do is put all of us, not just the poor, under their influence. They want to remove our incentive by raising taxes on everything to the point were it doesn't pay to work. They want to make all of us equally dependent on government assistance. Then they want to have the right to say who gets it and who doesn't.

 

[Zander]

Leading conservative economist Bruce Bartlett writes that the Obama-hating town-hall mobs have it wrong—the person they should be angry with left the White House seven months ago: "To a large extent, Obama is only cleaning up messes created by Bush." "Until conservatives once again hold Republicans to the same standard they hold Democrats, they will have no credibility and deserve no respect. They can start building some by admitting to themselves that Bush caused many of the problems they are protesting
underground

Got any original thoughts? this was a blatant copy and past with no attribution to the author. Talk about dishonesty!!
The GOP's Misplaced Rage - The Daily Beast