Uh, yeah, actually it is. Look at a map of the Russian Empire, and then look at a map of the USSR. Guess what, they are almost completely the same.
And th is is what you guys who look at the fall of the USSR fail to realize. It wasn't a system that failed, it was an empire that failed.
The fall of the USSR is no more a failure of "communism" than the fall of the British Empire is a failure of "Captialism". Empires fail. Systems adapt.
As much as you might wish it, Russia is considerably smaller that the USSR. History degree

.
Yeah, what's your fucking point, or did you completely miss it again.
Okay, one more time. The USSR did not fall because, "Communism sucks".
The USSR Fell because Uzbeks and Kazaks and Lithuanians decided they didn't want to be ruled by Russians, and Russians decided they really didn't want to rule them directly. (Although Russia does dominate the economies of these places still.)
But you guys will dance around the ruins of your middle class life style and say, "We won the cold war."
Well, sorry, guy, I look around, see that my generation isn't living as good as my father's generation, and the generation following me has even worse prospects than I have, and I guess I just don't see it. I think what you had was two empires that ground themselves into exhaustion.
In 1980, a PolSci professor said to me, the real threat to the US is not the USSR, it's the Third World.
2013, I'm seeing that as having come pretty much true.