Reading and Comprehension Skills Required.

[The T]

These people aren't even Democrats any longer. They're statists because they made a 90 degree hard-left turn toward Marxism in my view...and most here that think Republicans are 'The Establishment', have bought into a LIE.

They fight against themselves...and are too friggin' stupid to realize it.

And what's really funny is that today's statists are the ideological equivalent of the 60's radicals...and the 60s radicals HATED government.

And nevermind that those SAME radicals *ARE* the establishment... They were pissed then, and do the same thing they were angry at...~GO FIGURE

 

[Wry Catcher]

As opposed to your sound bite: "It's Bush's fault!!"

daveboy, do you know the difference between apples and oranges?

Yes. Do you know that if you call an apple an orange, it's still an apple?

Apparently not.

Horseshit. You're either stupid for believing it, or you're lying. Which is it?

Of course, bear in mind the two aren't mutually exclusive.

...and Democrats supported him in his response to 9/11...

For about 10 minutes, then they started screeching about war crimes.

...Obama, faced an organized effort to make sure he failed, and in my judgment and the judgment of others that effort is tantamount to treason.

Your judgement is seriously fucked. Note to retard leftists: Disagreeing with Obama is NOT treason, no matter how much you'd like to execute those who do.

Your little tin god is NOT America.

Hmmmph. Remember when dissent was patriotic? That stopped in January of '09.

Dissent is patriotic. You are so dishonest you actually suggest hoping Obama fails, and working to obstruct each and every policy effort by a POTUS elected by the people is dissent. It is not, it is tantamlunt to treason.

 

[daveman]

These people aren't even Democrats any longer. They're statists because they made a 90 degree hard-left turn toward Marxism in my view...and most here that think Republicans are 'The Establishment', have bought into a LIE.

They fight against themselves...and are too friggin' stupid to realize it.

And what's really funny is that today's statists are the ideological equivalent of the 60's radicals...and the 60s radicals HATED government.

And nevermind that those SAME radicals *ARE* the establishment... They were pissed then, and do the same thing they were angry at...~GO FIGURE

They are now The Man.

 

[The T]

And what's really funny is that today's statists are the ideological equivalent of the 60's radicals...and the 60s radicals HATED government.

And nevermind that those SAME radicals *ARE* the establishment... They were pissed then, and do the same thing they were angry at...~GO FIGURE

They are now The Man.

They have the power and are hurting the very SAME folks they claimed to care about...

 

[daveman]

Dissent is patriotic. You are so dishonest you actually suggest hoping Obama fails, and working to obstruct each and every policy effort by a POTUS elected by the people is dissent. It is not, it is tantamlunt to treason.

First off, "tantamlunt" isn't even a word. Dumbass.

Second, did you have the same opinion when the left was hoping Bush failed, and worked to obstruct each and every policy effort by a POTUS elected by the people?

You will either respond that no such thing happened, or that yes, you had the same opinion. Neither of which will be at all credible.

Or you might go full-on moonbat and screech that Bush was "selected, not elected".

Once again, for stupid leftists: Obama is not America. Good Gaea, you morons just refuse to understand that.

 

[daveman]

And nevermind that those SAME radicals *ARE* the establishment... They were pissed then, and do the same thing they were angry at...~GO FIGURE

They are now The Man.

They have the power and are hurting the very SAME folks they claimed to care about...

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

 

[The T]

They are now The Man.

They have the power and are hurting the very SAME folks they claimed to care about...

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

 

[daveman]

They have the power and are hurting the very SAME folks they claimed to care about...

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

"Uncle Tom". "House n----r".

 

[The Rabbi]

They have the power and are hurting the very SAME folks they claimed to care about...

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

The truth is that Democrats are the biggest racists on the planet. In their minds black people cannot compete and cannot live successfully without gov't aid.
It is total bunk and someone needs to call the Dums on it.

 

[The T]

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

"Uncle Tom". "House n----r".

I've already read that by some blacks here on these boards regarding Herman Cain...It's just sick...

 

[daveman]

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

The truth is that Democrats are the biggest racists on the planet. In their minds black people cannot compete and cannot live successfully without gov't aid.
It is total bunk and someone needs to call the Dums on it.

"There, there, Mr. Minority. We know you're not good enough to succeed on your own. Let us white liberals help you." *pat on the head*

The soft bigotry of low expectations.

 

[daveman]

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

"Uncle Tom". "House n----r".

I've already read that by some blacks here on these boards regarding Herman Cain...It's just sick...

But don't you dare call them bigots. It's impossible for liberals to be bigots.

Or so liberals tell me.

 

[sparky]

Can we get real for a moment? Businesses don’t need more financial incentives. They’re already sitting on a vast cash hoard estimated to be upwards of $1.9 trillion. Besides, large and middle-sized companies are having no difficulty getting loans at bargain-basement rates, courtesy of the Fed.

In consequence, businesses are already spending as much as they can justify economically. Almost two-thirds of the measly growth in the economy so far this year has come from businesses rebuilding their inventories. But without more consumer spending, businesses won’t spend more. A robust economy can’t be built on inventory replacements.

The problem isn’t on the supply side. It’s on the demand side. Businesses are reluctant to spend more and create more jobs because there aren’t enough consumers out there able and willing to buy what businesses have to sell.

The reason consumers aren’t buying is consumers’ paychecks are dropping, adjusted for inflation. And job losses are mounting. The 83,000 new private-sector jobs created in May represent a net loss because 125,000 jobs are needed merely to keep up with an expanding labor force. The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits edged higher last week.

At the same time, many Americans are falling behind in their mortgage payments. And housing prices continue to drop – making homeowners feel even poorer.

Close to 60 percent of the half-trillion drop in household debt since the depth of recession has been defaults rather than repayments. This makes it harder for people who’d like to enter the housing market to get new mortgage loans, or for anyone to refinance. Other consumer debt burdens are rising. On Tuesday the Fed reported consumer credit outstanding rose in April – mostly from record-high levels of student-loan debt and an up-tick in credit-card borrowing due to food and gas price increases outpacing wage gains

Robert Reich (Why the President Must Come Up With Demand-Side Solutions, And Not Go Over to the Supply Side)




if one word could be utilized it would, imho, be

JOBS!

 

[The T]

Oh, they've always claimed to care about them...but they never have.

All one has to do is look at policy...and then try to speak against the PLANTATION they reside over.

The truth is that Democrats are the biggest racists on the planet. In their minds black people cannot compete and cannot live successfully without gov't aid.
It is total bunk and someone needs to call the Dums on it.

In their minds *NO ONE* can make it without Mommy Gubmint...it's far worse when a BLACK MAN, Hispanic or some other group they've managed to corral into the welfare state wanders off to persue their dreams on their own...

 

[The T]

"Uncle Tom". "House n----r".

I've already read that by some blacks here on these boards regarding Herman Cain...It's just sick...

But don't you dare call them bigots. It's impossible for liberals to be bigots.

Or so liberals tell me.

They think they're alot of things. Control Freaks fits the bill...

 

[daveman]

I've already read that by some blacks here on these boards regarding Herman Cain...It's just sick...

But don't you dare call them bigots. It's impossible for liberals to be bigots.

Or so liberals tell me.

They think they're alot of things. Control Freaks fits the bill...

Indeed. They know what's best for you, better than you do.

 

[The T]

But don't you dare call them bigots. It's impossible for liberals to be bigots.

Or so liberals tell me.

They think they're alot of things. Control Freaks fits the bill...

Indeed. They know what's best for you, better than you do.

And whay they corral people into groupthink...Individualism cannot be tolerated...for it fosters real thought and true LIBERTY.

 

[The Rabbi]

Can we get real for a moment? Businesses don’t need more financial incentives. They’re already sitting on a vast cash hoard estimated to be upwards of $1.9 trillion. Besides, large and middle-sized companies are having no difficulty getting loans at bargain-basement rates, courtesy of the Fed.

In consequence, businesses are already spending as much as they can justify economically. Almost two-thirds of the measly growth in the economy so far this year has come from businesses rebuilding their inventories. But without more consumer spending, businesses won’t spend more. A robust economy can’t be built on inventory replacements.

The problem isn’t on the supply side. It’s on the demand side. Businesses are reluctant to spend more and create more jobs because there aren’t enough consumers out there able and willing to buy what businesses have to sell.

The reason consumers aren’t buying is consumers’ paychecks are dropping, adjusted for inflation. And job losses are mounting. The 83,000 new private-sector jobs created in May represent a net loss because 125,000 jobs are needed merely to keep up with an expanding labor force. The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits edged higher last week.

At the same time, many Americans are falling behind in their mortgage payments. And housing prices continue to drop – making homeowners feel even poorer.

Close to 60 percent of the half-trillion drop in household debt since the depth of recession has been defaults rather than repayments. This makes it harder for people who’d like to enter the housing market to get new mortgage loans, or for anyone to refinance. Other consumer debt burdens are rising. On Tuesday the Fed reported consumer credit outstanding rose in April – mostly from record-high levels of student-loan debt and an up-tick in credit-card borrowing due to food and gas price increases outpacing wage gains

Robert Reich (Why the President Must Come Up With Demand-Side Solutions, And Not Go Over to the Supply Side)




if one word could be utilized it would, imho, be

JOBS!

Are you an advisor to Obama? Because with an analysis that stupid you could easily be.
Jobs come from companies. The gov't could hire people to dig ditches but they would have to tax companies fo the money. We've seen how that's worked out.
Businesses will invest when the environment becomes favorable and they dont have to worry about:
1) Sarbanes Oxley
2) Obamacare
3) Cap N Trade
4) Further regulation
5) More taxation (just ask the makers of medical devices, taxed under Obamacare)
6) Incipient inflation
7) Eroding value of the dollar
8) Foreign instability caused by Obama's weak policy.

Until then, fuhgeddaboutit.

 

[The T]

Can we get real for a moment? Businesses don’t need more financial incentives. They’re already sitting on a vast cash hoard estimated to be upwards of $1.9 trillion. Besides, large and middle-sized companies are having no difficulty getting loans at bargain-basement rates, courtesy of the Fed.

In consequence, businesses are already spending as much as they can justify economically. Almost two-thirds of the measly growth in the economy so far this year has come from businesses rebuilding their inventories. But without more consumer spending, businesses won’t spend more. A robust economy can’t be built on inventory replacements.

The problem isn’t on the supply side. It’s on the demand side. Businesses are reluctant to spend more and create more jobs because there aren’t enough consumers out there able and willing to buy what businesses have to sell.

The reason consumers aren’t buying is consumers’ paychecks are dropping, adjusted for inflation. And job losses are mounting. The 83,000 new private-sector jobs created in May represent a net loss because 125,000 jobs are needed merely to keep up with an expanding labor force. The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits edged higher last week.

At the same time, many Americans are falling behind in their mortgage payments. And housing prices continue to drop – making homeowners feel even poorer.

Close to 60 percent of the half-trillion drop in household debt since the depth of recession has been defaults rather than repayments. This makes it harder for people who’d like to enter the housing market to get new mortgage loans, or for anyone to refinance. Other consumer debt burdens are rising. On Tuesday the Fed reported consumer credit outstanding rose in April – mostly from record-high levels of student-loan debt and an up-tick in credit-card borrowing due to food and gas price increases outpacing wage gains

Robert Reich (Why the President Must Come Up With Demand-Side Solutions, And Not Go Over to the Supply Side)




if one word could be utilized it would, imho, be

JOBS!

Are you an advisor to Obama? Because with an analysis that stupid you could easily be.
Jobs come from companies. The gov't could hire people to dig ditches but they would have to tax companies fo the money. We've seen how that's worked out.
Businesses will invest when the environment becomes favorable and they dont have to worry about:
1) Sarbanes Oxley
2) Obamacare
3) Cap N Trade
4) Further regulation
5) More taxation (just ask the makers of medical devices, taxed under Obamacare)
6) Incipient inflation
7) Eroding value of the dollar
8) Foreign instability caused by Obama's weak policy.

Until then, fuhgeddaboutit.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Dissent is patriotic. You are so dishonest you actually suggest hoping Obama fails, and working to obstruct each and every policy effort by a POTUS elected by the people is dissent. It is not, it is tantamlunt to treason.

First off, "tantamlunt" isn't even a word. Dumbass.

Second, did you have the same opinion when the left was hoping Bush failed, and worked to obstruct each and every policy effort by a POTUS elected by the people?

You will either respond that no such thing happened, or that yes, you had the same opinion. Neither of which will be at all credible.

Or you might go full-on moonbat and screech that Bush was "selected, not elected".

Once again, for stupid leftists: Obama is not America. Good Gaea, you morons just refuse to understand that.

First of all Cavil is a word and describes your post (to raise irritating and trivial objections; find fault with unnecessarily). Of course most knew the word was tantamount.

Next, no one i know hoped Bush failed, for to hope he failed would impact the American people. And, as most of us know Bush didn't need any help to fail, he was nearly perfect in that regard.

Yes, I dissented, I thought from day one (Sept. 11, 2001) that we should go after the perps as criminals, calling for a war on terror was stupid, suggesting a new crusade (as Bush did) was insane and invading and occupying Iraq has been tragic.

We still don't understand why 19 Saudi nationals attacked our nation. Of course Bush believed they did so because 'they' hate our freedom. I ask if that is so, what do you think motivated the Arab Spring and the earlier green movement in Iran? Were those Muslims in the streets terrorists or freedom fighters? And if they value freedom, why do they really hate us?