Read the fine print

[eagle7-31]

Why Democrats Want to Get Rid of the Suburbs

The war on America's suburbs has opened a new front. Buried in President Biden's proposed budget for 2023 is a $10-billion bribe for suburban communities to remove zoning barriers to high-density housing. The federal gov...

www.americanthinker.com

dems seem to have a problem with suburbs.

 

[eagle7-31]

Why Democrats Want to Get Rid of the Suburbs

The war on America's suburbs has opened a new front. Buried in President Biden's proposed budget for 2023 is a $10-billion bribe for suburban communities to remove zoning barriers to high-density housing. The federal gov...

www.americanthinker.com

dems seem to have a problem with suburbs.

The war on America's suburbs has opened a new front. Buried in President Biden's proposed budget for 2023 is a $10-billion bribe for suburban communities to remove zoning barriers to high-density housing. The federal government promises the suburbs funding for street improvements, traffic control, and water and sewer lines if they adopt "housing-forward policies" that eliminate single-family zoning and open their communities to "affordable housing."

This is no benign endeavor to provide more housing. It is a strong signal to Democrat-controlled states to gear up the decades-long efforts to bludgeon affluent communities into submitting to "housing justice" and providing their "fair share."

The New York metro area has been ground zero for efforts to erode local zoning, and if Democrats retain the governorship and supermajorities in both houses of the Legislature, the pressure will be on New York's officials to enact legislation — first to weaken local zoning and then to destroy it. Their new tools are accessory dwelling units (ADUs), which can be apartments over garages and standalone dwellings, and large multi-family transit-oriented developments (TODs), surrounding train stations and bus depots.

These efforts are being fueled by housing activists and progressive think-tanks like the Brookings Institution, which declared in a January 2022 article: "By some measures, the suburban counties around New York City have some of the worst exclusionary zoning in the nation."

To understand the hostility to the suburbs, some background is useful. The initial strategy was to usurp local control through litigation brought by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). It had limited success because to eviscerate local control, HUD had to prove racial discrimination, which by the 1980s and 1990s had largely been eradicated. So HUD tried other tactics. In 2009, HUD and a housing activist forced New York's Westchester County into a settlement to build 750 units of affordable housing due to the county's sloppy reporting of its federal housing grants.

Then HUD tried to use the settlement as a wedge to expand the agreement and force Westchester to sue individual municipalities to change their zoning. HUD's efforts failed due to its lack of statutory authority, due to New York's constitutional protection of local zoning, and because then–county executive Rob Astorino, now running in the Republican gubernatorial primary to challenge Democrat Governor Kathy Hochul, fought relentlessly to protect the municipalities.

But the housing justice activists never give up. In early 2022, Governor Kathy Hochul, who stepped into her role on Andrew Cuomo's departure, tried to sneak into her executive budget mandated ADUs and TODs, both of which would override local zoning. In the case of ADUs, municipalities would be prevented from using setback or parking requirements. In the case of TODs, local zoning would be eviscerated and replaced with state control.


Negative reaction from the suburbs was swift.

"This is a sledgehammer to the suburbs," said Astorino. "Governor Hochul will abolish single-family residential zoning with this legislation and prohibit protections against overcrowding in our neighborhoods, schools, and streets. The power to plan a community must be with local elected officials, not dictated by Albany."

Strong objections were also voiced by the state's Association of Towns and the New York Conference of Mayors; elected officials throughout the lower Hudson Valley and Long Island; and Hochul's Democratic primary opponent, Thomas Suozzi.

Faced with bipartisan opposition, Hochul backed down. But her action is only a temporary tactical retreat from the progressives' long-term plan to turn the suburbs into state-controlled, monolithic residential areas built around mass transit.

There are a number of bills pending in New York's Legislature that will be re-activated if the Democrats retain one-party rule in the state. Brookings cheers New York politicians' efforts: "Albany is awash in proposals for land use reform."


Proposed S.4547 would override local zoning to permit the construction of ADUs as small as 550 square feet on residential property for the purposes of rental. Municipalities would be prevented from imposing barriers to the units, including parking requirements, setbacks, or allowable residential density.

S.7574 would create statewide standards for local zoning, legalize duplexes and four-unit buildings, and allow housing to be built without off-street parking.

S.7635 would create an "anti-snob" law, which would allow the development of qualified affordable housing in any community where less than 10% of the housing stock is below market.

S.9462 would establish a special joint legislative commission on affordable housing to make recommendations on future legislation.

People move to the suburbs because they want good education for their children, safe communities, and engagement with neighbors on civic and religious issues, along with an attractive lifestyle. The continuation of one-party rule in New York would imperil all of these as well as engage the war on the suburbs in other Democrat-controlled states.

 

[KissMy]

Red-lining has been banned in the USA, so there is no more running & hiding from blacks. They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children. If you have a problem with that, move to a homogeneous country like China.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Why Democrats Want to Get Rid of the Suburbs

The war on America's suburbs has opened a new front. Buried in President Biden's proposed budget for 2023 is a $10-billion bribe for suburban communities to remove zoning barriers to high-density housing. The federal gov...

www.americanthinker.com

dems seem to have a problem with suburbs.

Too much freedom from Dem conrol out there.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children.

They'll be inside my schools? Inside my children?
They'd better not be.

 

[eagle7-31]

Red-lining has been banned in the USA, so there is no more running & hiding from blacks. They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children. If you have a problem with that, move to a homogeneous country like China.

People of any race, creed etc should be able to live where they want and not by some snotty ass bureaucrat.

 

[kaz]

Red-lining has been banned in the USA, so there is no more running & hiding from blacks. They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children. If you have a problem with that, move to a homogeneous country like China.

Kiss my ass, racist

 

[miketx]

Red-lining has been banned in the USA, so there is no more running & hiding from blacks. They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children. If you have a problem with that, move to a homogeneous country like China.

So long as they obey the law fine. If not then open season.

 

[KissMy]

People of any race, creed etc should be able to live where they want and not by some snotty ass bureaucrat.

Racial covenants & red-lining were banned, so you can't prevent blacks from moving next door, going to local schools or your kids from playing with or having sex with them.

 

[Penelope]

Why Democrats Want to Get Rid of the Suburbs

The war on America's suburbs has opened a new front. Buried in President Biden's proposed budget for 2023 is a $10-billion bribe for suburban communities to remove zoning barriers to high-density housing. The federal gov...

www.americanthinker.com

dems seem to have a problem with suburbs.

re-zoning can make more housing units. More people, not less, the female writer doesn't know what she is talking about.

 

[eagle7-31]

re-zoning can make more housing units. More people, not less, the female writer doesn't know what she is talking about.

Local sure, not some DC bureaucrat several hundred miles away. That bill is ridiculous.

 

[KissMy]

 

[daveman]

Democrats hate the American dream, and they hate people being happy.

 

[Billiejeens]

re-zoning can make more housing units. More people, not less, the female writer doesn't know what she is talking about.

Reading is fundamental.
You didn't get than memo, huh?

 

[Woodznutz]

Red-lining has been banned in the USA, so there is no more running & hiding from blacks. They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children. If you have a problem with that, move to a homogeneous country like China.

I would have a problem with blacks being inside my children.

 

[kaz]

Racial covenants & red-lining were banned, so you can't prevent blacks from moving next door, going to local schools or your kids from playing with or having sex with them.

Yeah, racist, that's the only downside to having huge public housing project, the blacks!

You're a race baiter, which is completely racist. Don't want large numbers of dense living space, it's because they're black!

As a racist, you just think all blacks are poor

 

[kaz]

I would have a problem with blacks being inside my children.

Seriously, I'm with you on that. I'm thinking the same about Asians and Latinos. Oh, and whites. They aren't going inside my children either ...

 

[Woodznutz]

Yeah, racist, that's the only downside to having huge public housing project, the blacks!

You're a race baiter, which is completely racist. Don't want large numbers of dense living space, it's because they're black!

As a racist, you just think all blacks are poor

I think it is poor blacks that would be attracted to low-cost high density living, i.e. the "projects". Waddyabet those high density apartments would have a basketball court next door and a liquor store down the street.

Jes' sayin'.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

They will be inside your gated subdivisions, schools & your children.

 

[KissMy]

Yeah, racist, that's the only downside to having huge public housing project, the blacks!

You're a race baiter, which is completely racist. Don't want large numbers of dense living space, it's because they're black!

As a racist, you just think all blacks are poor

No, Blacks urban houses will be going up in value while white sub-burbs drop. They will have a lot of money.