Read it & WEEP libs! Even NPR admits the Russia investigation won't go ANYWHERE!

I can't wait to see a MASSIVE flood of liberal tears on here & everywhere else when the Russia investigation results in NO charges against Trump!!

The online community that's fervently depending on the 73-year-old former FBI director to shake up the Trump presidency may be in for its share of disappointment.

Three months into the job, however, it's not clear what, if anything, investigators may uncover about the president, who has repeatedly denied any improper contacts with people in Russia and has called the special counsel probe "a witch hunt."

"They're investigating something that never happened," Trump told reporters last week. "There was no collusion between us and Russia. In fact, the opposite. Russia spent a lot of money on fighting me."

Moreover, even if authorities uncover damaging information about Trump or anyone else in the White House, there are serious questions about whether that material will ever be made public, short of an indictment or impeachment.

Another complicating factor: Mueller is using grand juries in Alexandria, Va., and Washington, D.C., and grand jury information is rarely made public.

In his leak investigation, a lot of information eventually became public through the prosecution of former vice presidential aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Absent a decision to charge someone with a crime, investigations in Congress may be the best way for people to understand what happened and why in last year's election interference.

Robert Mueller May Not Be The Savior The Anti-Trump Internet Is Hoping For
Don't disparage the people over 70.

We know Trump, and approved of, Jr and Jared meeting with Russians for illegal information. I'm not sure what effect that had on Trump's failing poll numbers. I suspect his trying to shut down an investigation had more influence, but who knows. But, Trump succeeded in putting attention on racism, bigotry and intolerance of sexual orientation. The dems still have to have an econ plan, but Trump has succeeded in moving past even Wallace.
to be fair, it wasn't trump that put it there. it was the democrats and like all good people looking for hate-bullets, they ran with it using any "argument" they could to validate the worst in someone, whether true or not.
 
Foreign Policy Magazine

EXCLUSIVE GOP Congressman Met in Moscow With Kremlin-Linked Lawyer at Center of Russia Investigation


Rep. Dana Rohrabacher met in Moscow with Natalia Veselnitskaya two months before she met with Donald Trump Jr.

BY ELIAS GROLL OCTOBER 3, 2017 ELIAS.GROLL@ELIASGROLL

Rep. Dana Rohrabacher met with the Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya during a 2016 trip to Moscow, a previously undisclosed tête-à-tête that sheds additional light on the extent to which Moscow-based political operatives sought to influence American officials in the run-up to last year’s presidential election.

In an interview with a pro-Russian Crimean news service, Veselnitskaya said she met with Rohrabacher — a California Republican and arguably the most prominent advocate in Congress for closer relations between Washington and Moscow — in April 2016 to discuss issues surrounding the Magnitsky Act, the punitive American sanctions measure responding to Russian human rights abuses that she has lobbied against.

“We just asked to listen to us, just to listen to the alternative version,” Veselnitskaya said in the interview, seated in a futuristic-looking wingback chair set against a light purple background. She attacked the sanctions measure’s proponents and told Rohrabacher that American lawmakers had been duped. “‘Do not let yourself be used by scammers,’” she recalled saying.

Kenneth Grubbs, a spokesman for Rohrabacher, confirmed that the meeting took place but that the congressman “was not focused on her identity.” Grubbs described Veselnitskaya as “among many people” Rohrabacher encountered during a congressional delegation he led to Moscow.



Read more: GOP Congressman Met in Moscow With Kremlin-Linked Lawyer at Center of Russia Investigation
 
I can't wait to see a MASSIVE flood of liberal tears on here & everywhere else when the Russia investigation results in NO charges against Trump!!

The online community that's fervently depending on the 73-year-old former FBI director to shake up the Trump presidency may be in for its share of disappointment.

Three months into the job, however, it's not clear what, if anything, investigators may uncover about the president, who has repeatedly denied any improper contacts with people in Russia and has called the special counsel probe "a witch hunt."

"They're investigating something that never happened," Trump told reporters last week. "There was no collusion between us and Russia. In fact, the opposite. Russia spent a lot of money on fighting me."

Moreover, even if authorities uncover damaging information about Trump or anyone else in the White House, there are serious questions about whether that material will ever be made public, short of an indictment or impeachment.

Another complicating factor: Mueller is using grand juries in Alexandria, Va., and Washington, D.C., and grand jury information is rarely made public.

In his leak investigation, a lot of information eventually became public through the prosecution of former vice presidential aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Absent a decision to charge someone with a crime, investigations in Congress may be the best way for people to understand what happened and why in last year's election interference.

Robert Mueller May Not Be The Savior The Anti-Trump Internet Is Hoping For
This may all be true but the media just caught trump giving out paper towels in PR and all hell is breaking loose.
 
I love seeing all the liberal TEARS on this board because they KNOW Trump will NEVER be impeached!!
 
According to an assortment of news reports, several signs suggest that President Donald Trump’s inner circle is increasingly concerned about where the Russia investigations could lead.

If its a big nothing burger, then why is the whitehouse acting like its a something-burger?

That's a FAKE story! Just yesterday Chief of Staff General John Kelly said the media is getting WRONG information from BAD sources!

That FAKE link you posted is an example! Bannon has seen the Russia evidence & he said there is NOTHING there! Also Trump surrogate Michael Caputo was already interviewed by investigators & some of the emails Mueller has actually EXONERATE Trump!!

DELUSIONAL liberals are OWNED!!
 
No one knows what's going on with the Russian investigations except those involved.
And one who knows, Joachim Castro has already said "there will people going to prison"
YOUre in for shocking surprise.
Yes, because the anti-Trump media would never report on "unnamed sources".

Castro is an idiotic Chinese looking beaner who should be deported but NPR already interviewed him & he said he has ZERO evidence to back up his claims so you liberals LOSE yet AGAIN!!

I LOVE IT!!!! :beer: :thewave:
 
We are not at war with Russia. It is not illegal to speak to Russians. It is not illegal to conduct business transactions with Russians. That's why this investigation is going noplace.
 
We are not at war with Russia. It is not illegal to speak to Russians. It is not illegal to conduct business transactions with Russians. That's why this investigation is going noplace.
Title 11 of CFR section 110.20 (g) says that "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation" for a political campaign. Something of value also includes information about political opponent.
 
We are not at war with Russia. It is not illegal to speak to Russians. It is not illegal to conduct business transactions with Russians. That's why this investigation is going noplace.
Title 11 of CFR section 110.20 (g) says that "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation" for a political campaign. Something of value also includes information about political opponent.

And there is ZERO evidence that happened!! Everyone at the Don Jr. meeting said NO information about Hillary was disclosed so you LOSE yet again!!
 
We are not at war with Russia. It is not illegal to speak to Russians. It is not illegal to conduct business transactions with Russians. That's why this investigation is going noplace.
Title 11 of CFR section 110.20 (g) says that "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation" for a political campaign. Something of value also includes information about political opponent.

And there is ZERO evidence that happened!! Everyone at the Don Jr. meeting said NO information about Hillary was disclosed so you LOSE yet again!!
That meeting was mostly discussing repeal of Magnitsky act, which is violation of Logan Act.
 
I can't wait to see a MASSIVE flood of liberal tears on here & everywhere else when the Russia investigation results in NO charges against Trump!!

The online community that's fervently depending on the 73-year-old former FBI director to shake up the Trump presidency may be in for its share of disappointment.

Three months into the job, however, it's not clear what, if anything, investigators may uncover about the president, who has repeatedly denied any improper contacts with people in Russia and has called the special counsel probe "a witch hunt."

"They're investigating something that never happened," Trump told reporters last week. "There was no collusion between us and Russia. In fact, the opposite. Russia spent a lot of money on fighting me."

Moreover, even if authorities uncover damaging information about Trump or anyone else in the White House, there are serious questions about whether that material will ever be made public, short of an indictment or impeachment.

Another complicating factor: Mueller is using grand juries in Alexandria, Va., and Washington, D.C., and grand jury information is rarely made public.

In his leak investigation, a lot of information eventually became public through the prosecution of former vice presidential aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Absent a decision to charge someone with a crime, investigations in Congress may be the best way for people to understand what happened and why in last year's election interference.

Robert Mueller May Not Be The Savior The Anti-Trump Internet Is Hoping For


Unlike others here, I read the article and your thread title is a lie.
You lie and hope no one will actually click on your link.
You're a coward, just like Trump.
 
We are not at war with Russia. It is not illegal to speak to Russians. It is not illegal to conduct business transactions with Russians. That's why this investigation is going noplace.
Title 11 of CFR section 110.20 (g) says that "No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation" for a political campaign. Something of value also includes information about political opponent.

And there is ZERO evidence that happened!! Everyone at the Don Jr. meeting said NO information about Hillary was disclosed so you LOSE yet again!!

Why did Don Jr. have to lie several times about the meeting?
You're a true sucker, sucker.

He was misled
Trump Jr. said he thought the Russians had "political opposition research," as he explained in a statement included with the emails. Goldstone had offered what the publicist called "some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful." (They ultimately ended up talking about adoption.)

He was curious
Trump Jr. "wanted to hear [Goldstone] out and play it out and see what happens," as he told Sean Hannity on July 11. "Listen, I'd been reading about scandals that people were probably underreporting for a long time," he added. "So maybe it was something that had to do with one of those things. I mean, this is her perhaps involvement with the Russian government."

He was busy
His story shifted again Thursday. Trump Jr. told investigators at the Senate Judiciary Committee appointment that he was swamped with his father's campaign, fielding tons of emails, and he "had no way to gauge the reliability, credibility or accuracy of any of the things" in Goldstone's messages, according to the Times.

He was polite
Trump Jr. explained away his "I love it" remark as "a colloquial way of saying that I appreciated Rob’s gesture," according to the Times.

He was worried
Trump Jr. said Thursday that he felt he needed to know about any possible issues regarding any presidential candidate's abilities. (Remember: Last October, his father's campaign produced an ad attacking Clinton's health.) Trump Jr. said planned to consult with lawyers about any information he received before deciding whether "to give it further consideration."

Why did Donald Trump Jr. meet with the Russian lawyer? A full list of his changing excuses
 
I can't wait to see a MASSIVE flood of liberal tears on here & everywhere else when the Russia investigation results in NO charges against Trump!!

The online community that's fervently depending on the 73-year-old former FBI director to shake up the Trump presidency may be in for its share of disappointment.

Three months into the job, however, it's not clear what, if anything, investigators may uncover about the president, who has repeatedly denied any improper contacts with people in Russia and has called the special counsel probe "a witch hunt."

"They're investigating something that never happened," Trump told reporters last week. "There was no collusion between us and Russia. In fact, the opposite. Russia spent a lot of money on fighting me."

Moreover, even if authorities uncover damaging information about Trump or anyone else in the White House, there are serious questions about whether that material will ever be made public, short of an indictment or impeachment.

Another complicating factor: Mueller is using grand juries in Alexandria, Va., and Washington, D.C., and grand jury information is rarely made public.

In his leak investigation, a lot of information eventually became public through the prosecution of former vice presidential aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Absent a decision to charge someone with a crime, investigations in Congress may be the best way for people to understand what happened and why in last year's election interference.

Robert Mueller May Not Be The Savior The Anti-Trump Internet Is Hoping For
We shall see

The stink of Russian intervention hangs over the Trump Presidency
 
I can't wait to see a MASSIVE flood of liberal tears on here & everywhere else when the Russia investigation results in NO charges against Trump!!

The online community that's fervently depending on the 73-year-old former FBI director to shake up the Trump presidency may be in for its share of disappointment.

Three months into the job, however, it's not clear what, if anything, investigators may uncover about the president, who has repeatedly denied any improper contacts with people in Russia and has called the special counsel probe "a witch hunt."

"They're investigating something that never happened," Trump told reporters last week. "There was no collusion between us and Russia. In fact, the opposite. Russia spent a lot of money on fighting me."

Moreover, even if authorities uncover damaging information about Trump or anyone else in the White House, there are serious questions about whether that material will ever be made public, short of an indictment or impeachment.

Another complicating factor: Mueller is using grand juries in Alexandria, Va., and Washington, D.C., and grand jury information is rarely made public.

In his leak investigation, a lot of information eventually became public through the prosecution of former vice presidential aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Absent a decision to charge someone with a crime, investigations in Congress may be the best way for people to understand what happened and why in last year's election interference.

Robert Mueller May Not Be The Savior The Anti-Trump Internet Is Hoping For
We shall see

The stink of Russian intervention hangs over the Trump Presidency

MAYBE Russia intervened but they've been interfering in our & other elections for DECADES & WE have too so this has NOTHING to do with Trump!! Wikileaks has been around since 2006 & you KNOW Russia could've tried to hack into the DNC even if Trump NEVER ran so there goes your collusion DELUSION!!

In fact, Michael Smerconish on LIBERAL CNN found 60 different nations' elections the U.S. has tried to interfere in just since 1980!! Are we going to blame Trump for that too??!? :laugh:
 
I can't wait to see a MASSIVE flood of liberal tears on here & everywhere else when the Russia investigation results in NO charges against Trump!!

The online community that's fervently depending on the 73-year-old former FBI director to shake up the Trump presidency may be in for its share of disappointment.

Three months into the job, however, it's not clear what, if anything, investigators may uncover about the president, who has repeatedly denied any improper contacts with people in Russia and has called the special counsel probe "a witch hunt."

"They're investigating something that never happened," Trump told reporters last week. "There was no collusion between us and Russia. In fact, the opposite. Russia spent a lot of money on fighting me."

Moreover, even if authorities uncover damaging information about Trump or anyone else in the White House, there are serious questions about whether that material will ever be made public, short of an indictment or impeachment.

Another complicating factor: Mueller is using grand juries in Alexandria, Va., and Washington, D.C., and grand jury information is rarely made public.

In his leak investigation, a lot of information eventually became public through the prosecution of former vice presidential aide Lewis "Scooter" Libby. Absent a decision to charge someone with a crime, investigations in Congress may be the best way for people to understand what happened and why in last year's election interference.

Robert Mueller May Not Be The Savior The Anti-Trump Internet Is Hoping For

No, Mueller might not be the savior, but then he might be. What you're reporting is that someone wrong that something MIGHT NOT HAPPEN. Oh, wow. It might not rain tomorrow, wow.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top