You need specialist help old chap .
Whatever medication you end up on , I hope it stops you spewing your superstitious garbage over us .
No one is forcing you to be here. He may be incorrect on a number of things, but you can't pretend he is spewing anything on you when you voluntarily come to a religious forum.
Why do you feel it is necessary to deliberately mischaracterize his position? He was not attempting to censor anyone. Instead it is you that is
pretending that coercion is involved. That is inherently dishonest in my humble opinion.
I asked why he was claiming that GISMYS was somehow forcing his views on him ...
Like it or not but that is a deliberate
mischaracterization of what Blackcherry posted. It was you, and you alone, that misused the term
force. Blackcherry was merely suggesting that Gismys might benefit from professional help. If anyone was doing any
misreading it was you.
And yes, your claim is inherently dishonest,
First you that attacked him for expressing his opinion and now you are attacking me for expressing mine. Blackcherry might have a point.
Oh. So you
are deliberately lying. Like I said, I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt. But as you won't read what he actually said and continue to make this intensely dishonest argument, Im going to have to conclude I was wrong.
So you are saying that blackcherry wasn't objecting to him "spewing superstitious garbage"? Tell me, how force isn't involved in that statement.
BTW, where exactly did I attack Blackcherry? How is telling him he isn't forced to read or respond to Gismys an attack? Are you honestly trying to suggest disagreeing with an assertion is a personal attack and somehow wrong? If that's the case than this board is nothing BUT personal attacks and you would be the biggest hypocrite here.
In fact, the only person who has attacked anyone in the last few posts is
you. Because I didn't attack you either. If you notice, I was willing to give you the benefit of the doubt that you just misread what I said. Stating you are mischarcterizing what I said is not an attack on you.
However, now from this interaction I can honestly say the following things:
1) You falsely accused of me mischaracterizing Blackcherry's position.
2) You falsely accused me of attacking him/her and then attacking you
3) You have done exactly what you falsely accused me of doing and mischaracterized my position, even after being corrected.
4) You have attacked me based on your false accusations despite pretending to be outraged at attacks I never made.
Therefore, the only conclusions I can come to is you are intellectually dishonest, a complete liar, and a hypocrite.
Now, you can honestly say I attacked you. But unlike you I stated legitimate reasons and hope that you don't take it as any indication that hate or even dislike you. My criticisms of you are made in the sincere hope that you will recognize the weakness of your argument and will correct yourself. So please stop being a holier-than-thou sanctimonious ass. We will have far better discussions if you pull the tree from your eyes and try to have honest and civil discussions instead of trying to pull a splinter out of mine that may or may not be there. I am already working on my own faults and I am more than willing to forgive you for yours if you do the same.