Rape Trees

Lol…now you are attempting to split hairs. They came for the same reasons immigrants TODAY are coming (and they vilified by the nativists of tbe time). The thing is, you don’t demand they should have stayed behind and fight or change their home countries nor do you imply they are cowardly for not doing so.




Ahh no. You are the one creating a binary choice: we either have a complete wall or we let them all in.

My ancestors--BRITISH CITIZENS--came to a British colony. Others came LEGALLY. Do you still imagine that in the 1800s at some point, Americans let in millions, or even thousands, of illegal immigrants and gave them all free stuff?

Coyote--it is no mystery that people will take what you allow. Our justice system is built for this. The man who breaks into a pharmacy and steals medication for his dying child is still stealing, but the justice system should treat him differently than a man who breaks into a pharmacy to steal opioids to sell. At any rate, YOU DO NOT OPEN THE PHARMACIES AND LET PEOPLE TAKE WHATEVER THEY WANT.

That's first.

To your bigger point: yes, if the choice is, stay behind and make your nation better or break into another nation ILLEGALLY, the moral choice is to stay and fight.
 
There is nothing wrong with a binary choice. However, there is something wrong with false alternatives. The correct question is whether we should have a complete wall or not. If not, should we tear down the wall we already have?

She's not even being honest about what I've said. I've said we have a system for asylum and legal immigration. She can't counter that, so she lies and gaslights.

Moderator, everyone.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom