- Thread starter
- #141
Understand though, the estimates are made by a very distinguished professor.
Yep, I understand that. I also understand that the very definition of an IQ precludes his "estimates" to be anything more than speculative guesses.
I also understand that an IQ score is itself meaningless without providing context for what kind of scale it is on. You still can't answer that simple question.
You still have not debunked his results.
You really are pathetic!
It's not up to me debunk anything. The professor's claims are unsubstantiated. Indeed, they are unsubstantiatable.
I've given you a professors estimates of the IQ's of past presidents, you don't want to believe any of it, I could fucking care less.
IMO his credentials give us the likelihood of a fairly accurate ranking, I'll go with him and his research.