Rand Paul wants Susan Rice before Congress and under oath:he's going for the jugular

[GWV5903]

Rice was a national security advisor.

So why did she unmask them? Care to answer this...

It's her job to ask intelligence agencies for more details when they give her intelligence.

True, but why did she unmask them? When she unmasked them her ethics were non existent...

she'd be ethically remiss if she didn't ask.

Ethics had nothing to do with her motives, but I am sure you know this. I just wonder how many of you Liberal Loons are going to go to your graves still bitter that Hillary got her ass kicked by The Donald?

Who is going to fall on their sword for the Oblammer???

 

[mamooth]

Where is Schiff's evidence of collusion, dumbfuck?

Huh?

Just why are you fuktards babbling about Schiff? Which one of your masters told you that mattered, and why were you retarded enough to believe it?

Seriously. You guys are morons. I understand you're not deliberately treasonous, of course. You're just partisan hack dumbshits.

 

[mamooth]

So why did she unmask them?

Because it was her job, as a national security advisor, to learn about matters involving national security. And that means finding out who was involved.

This isn't rocket science, kids. Why is it so tough for you all?

 

[ptbw forever]

Where is Schiff's evidence of collusion, dumbfuck?

Huh?

Just why are you fuktards babbling about Schiff? Which one of your masters told you that mattered, and why were you retarded enough to believe it?

Seriously. You guys are morons. I understand you're not deliberately treasonous, of cours. You're just partisan hack dumbshits.

I have been talking about Schiff before anyone else.

Schiff's claim is no less outrageous than Trump's claim on its face, and yet Schiff is the leading Democrat in the committee conducting the investigation.

Who told you that Rand Paul is guilty of anything, dumbfuck?

 

[Wyatt earp]

So why did she unmask them?

Because it was her job, as a national security advisor, to learn about matters involving national security. And that means finding out who was involved.

This isn't rocket science, kids. Why is it so tough for you all?

Such "incidental" contacts, by the way, are supposed to be blacked-out in subsequent transcripts. That the Obama administration seems to have unmasked and shared these contacts and their conversations with foreign officials is beyond troubling — it suggests an operation to domestically spy on a political opponent, a breach of the law as big if not bigger than Watergate.

 

[GWV5903]

So why did she unmask them?

Because it was her job, as a national security advisor, to learn about matters involving national security. And that means finding out who was involved.

This isn't rocket science, kids. Why is it so tough for you all?

So in other words she is just as big of a sore loser as you?

The only children involved are the ones unmasking and the idiots such as yourself who defend these actions...

 

[mamooth]

So in other words she is just as big of a sore loser as you?

Pay attention, butthurt one. This is about the hilarious failure of all of your "Obama/Clinton/etc are going to jail, this time for sure!" proclamations. You've been making them nonstop for over 8 years now. You've failed hilariously with every single one. And it _still_ hasn't dawned on you that you're being played? That your masters are laughing at what morons their followers are?

Wow. In his grave, Stalin seethes in envy, wishing he had possessed such a huge cadre of such reliable Useful Idiots.

 

[Wyatt earp]

So why did she unmask them?

Because it was her job, as a national security advisor, to learn about matters involving national security. And that means finding out who was involved.

This isn't rocket science, kids. Why is it so tough for you all?

So in other words she is just as big of a sore loser as you?

The only children involved are the ones unmasking and the idiots such as yourself who defend these actions...

What Obama and company was doing was spying on foreigners known to be in contact with democrat foes, then calling them "incidental " ..

Do you all see how Obama and crew got around the warrants?



Good plan by the democrat machine and it looks like Susan Rice is the key to unravel it.



.

 

[mamooth]

Such "incidental" contacts, by the way, are supposed to be blacked-out in subsequent transcripts.

That's nice. Has nothing to do with the issue.

That the Obama administration seems to have unmasked and shared these contacts and their conversations with foreign officials is beyond troubling — it suggests an operation to domestically spy on a political opponent, a breach of the law as big if not bigger than Watergate.

That seems to have just been yanked out of your butt. You're off in a weird delusion land.

 

[tinydancer]

Didn't you Trump losers learn, after you got humiliated with your "Hillary is going to jail" babble? You're being played, morons.

Rice was a national security advisor. It's her job to ask intelligence agencies for more details when they give her intelligence. Those agencies are required to start out giving the bare minimum, and then the advisors ask for more if they need it.It's totally legal, and she'd be ethically remiss if she didn't ask.

So, the thread summary is that Rand Paul is a shockingly corrupt partisan hack. This stunt on his part may rises to Obstruction of Justice. That's what several Republican congressmen will need to be charged with.

Fool. The evidence Nunes saw had no relevance to the Russian investigation. Obama's administration spied on the Trump team for a year before the election. And the unmasking of private US citizens to play politics is as nasty as you can get. And of course the leaking is a felony.

 

[tinydancer]

So why did she unmask them?

Because it was her job, as a national security advisor, to learn about matters involving national security. And that means finding out who was involved.

This isn't rocket science, kids. Why is it so tough for you all?

No.Nunes clearly stated that the evidence he saw was not related to Russian, not to the Russian investigation not even anything to do with foreign intelligence. This is known as spying on your political opponents using the power of the intel community during an election cycle.

 

[tinydancer]

And just an important FYI. Unmasking of an American citizen is only to occur if it is a matter of national security or if there is a crime in progress or a crime that has been committed. All sources claim the unmasking was purely political.

 

[busybee01]

Rand Paul and Donald Trump were on the golf course together and the next day he pulls this stunt. Abuse his power as a Senator for cheap partisan gain. I'll bet Trump put him up to this. Nunes has no credibility either. He is the reason that a majority of Americans want a special commission to investigate Trump's ties to Russia.

Even if she asked for the names she committed no crime. If you wanted to view information on collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, it would be logical to ask for the names.

 

[tinydancer]

Rand Paul and Donald Trump were on the golf course together and the next day he pulls this stunt. Abuse his power as a Senator for cheap partisan gain. I'll bet Trump put him up to this. Nunes has no credibility either. He is the reason that a majority of Americans want a special commission to investigate Trump's ties to Russia.

Even if she asked for the names she committed no crime. If you wanted to view information on collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, it would be logical to ask for the names.

The evidence will be forthcoming in this investigation into the unmasking and the leaking. This investigation started to gear up after Nunes viewed the evidence that individuals who are protected were unmasked despite the communications having no relevance to Russia, the Russian investigation or any foreign surveillance. Gowdy announced that this would be a separate investigation.

Obama's administration was spying on Trump. WSJ is saying that the spying began before Trump even became the nominee. Unless the communications involved national security or a criminal act, Rice had no right to unmask US citizens.

And the leaks are criminal. I'm looking forward to this investigation.

 

[NoNukes]

It gets worse! The scandal is widening quickly now.


Susan Rice Ordered Spy Agencies To Produce ‘Detailed Spreadsheets’ Involving Trump

OMG! Will you quit clouding the narrative with FACTS!

It would be the first time that he did.

 

[Theowl32]

Didn't all of these piles of shit all once plead the 5th when confronted about targeting conservative groups with the IRS? Or was that others?

It is funny though how the same demented asshat losers on the left have this ahhhh haaaah moment when the obama democrat Flynn asked for immunity. All of a sudden the losers on the left cry that the only reason anyone would do that is because they are guilty.

The point is they all know the legal tactics they can and will use. When they do use them the media will feed their losers spoon fed bullshit and the losers will buy it every time.

They always do. Always.

Look at how demented they are. You think Susan Rice will admit anything?

 

[GWV5903]

So in other words she is just as big of a sore loser as you?

Pay attention, butthurt one. This is about the hilarious failure of all of your "Obama/Clinton/etc are going to jail, this time for sure!" proclamations. You've been making them nonstop for over 8 years now. You've failed hilariously with every single one. And it _still_ hasn't dawned on you that you're being played? That your masters are laughing at what morons their followers are?

Wow. In his grave, Stalin seethes in envy, wishing he had possessed such a huge cadre of such reliable Useful Idiots.

No butthurt here...

There are a lot of crooked politicians and there are a lot of individuals such as yourself who will go to the end of the earth to defend their actions...

You're delusional, you're in denial about your own Socialist beliefs, this is a common theme among Left Wing Nut Jobs...

 

[busybee01]

Rand Paul and Donald Trump were on the golf course together and the next day he pulls this stunt. Abuse his power as a Senator for cheap partisan gain. I'll bet Trump put him up to this. Nunes has no credibility either. He is the reason that a majority of Americans want a special commission to investigate Trump's ties to Russia.

Even if she asked for the names she committed no crime. If you wanted to view information on collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, it would be logical to ask for the names.

The evidence will be forthcoming in this investigation into the unmasking and the leaking. This investigation started to gear up after Nunes viewed the evidence that individuals who are protected were unmasked despite the communications having no relevance to Russia, the Russian investigation or any foreign surveillance. Gowdy announced that this would be a separate investigation.

Obama's administration was spying on Trump. WSJ is saying that the spying began before Trump even became the nominee. Unless the communications involved national security or a criminal act, Rice had no right to unmask US citizens.

And the leaks are criminal. I'm looking forward to this investigation.

You are relying on Nunes. He has hopelessly compromised his investigation by being partisan. That is why people want a special committee to investigate this. Obama was not spying on Trump. You a just another Trump Davidian. Another fanatic that will do anything to defend Trump.

 

[Ridgerunner]

That seems to have just been yanked out of your butt. You're off in a weird delusion land.

And you have some bizarre obsession with "butts" mamooth ...

 

[mamooth]

We know how this ends.

Nothing happens, because it's a kook conspiracy theory.

A bit later, the kooks get fed a new "Obama/Clinton/etc are going to jail, this time for sure!" story.

Not being very bright, they fall for it again. And the cycle repeats endlessly. It's how their masters keep them hysterical and obedient.