Rand Paul should be the new President

[Libertary]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

Define "liberal".

Liberal in economic points.

 

[blunthead]

His views on women's rights, taxes.. Oh, and he's a right wing stooge.

Are you a commie?

How long does it take for arguments to turn into just plain insulting? Not long by the looks of it.

I take it as a compliment these days.

Your footnotes indicate that you apparently take it as a compliment. I just wonder how someone can believe that communism can work or that communist leaders can be trusted after all we've seen the philosophy actually do in the world.

 

[blunthead]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

Define "liberal".

Liberal in economic points.

No, I mean what do you mean by "liberal"? Define the word as you understand it to mean. It's not a rhetorical question, I just wonder what the word means to you.

 

[Socialist]

His views on women's rights, taxes.. Oh, and he's a right wing stooge.

Are you a commie?

How long does it take for arguments to turn into just plain insulting? Not long by the looks of it.

I take it as a compliment these days.

Your footnotes indicate that you apparently take it as a compliment. I just wonder how someone can believe that communism can work or that communist leaders can be trusted after all we've seen the philosophy actually do in the world.

Not sure how one living under feudalism would be able to believe that liberal democracy/capitalism would work.

 

[Libertary]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

How exactly is decreasing taxes to zero on the super rich and allowing monopolies to run everything = a better economy. Learn economics and you may understand why Rand Paul is bad.

I think it is very unfair if you take more than 40% of somebody's income. Rand Paul will not decrease the taxes to zero. Rand Paul did not say that he will allow monopolies.

 

[Socialist]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

How exactly is decreasing taxes to zero on the super rich and allowing monopolies to run everything = a better economy. Learn economics and you may understand why Rand Paul is bad.

I think it is very unfair if you take more than 40% of somebody's income. Rand Paul will not decrease the taxes to zero. Rand Paul did not say that he will allow monopolies.

I think it's fair, hell, take more, if someone is making millions while children are struggling to meet their needs and while people are homeless/millions lack healthcare..

 

[Libertary]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

Define "liberal".

Liberal in economic points.

No, I mean what do you mean by "liberal"? Define the word as you understand it to mean. It's not a rhetorical question, I just wonder what the word means to you.

The opposite of the socialist state which Barack Obama has made.

 

[Avorysuds]

His views on women's rights, taxes.. Oh, and he's a right wing stooge.

Are you a commie?

How's the USSR doin today....

You lose....

Hows China, South Korea, Germany, Britain and Taiwan doing? You do know that they're social democracies with public sectors and their governments use the tax dollars on infrastructure?

People like you don't know shit. The 19th century slavery of the big corp is all you know.

They are such awesome countries I can't help but wonder why you don't live there....

Lol, slavery, big corp... are you for real?

 

[ScienceRocks]

I've taken more then a few terms of political science and I can tell you that most first world countries are social democracies. What is a social democracy? It is a country with a public and private sector that has government regulating them.

The second most powerful nation earth is China, Germany, France, Japan, Britain,etc. What do all these successful nations have in common? They have government regulations and a public sector. Dispute it loons.

Small government hasn't done shit for anyone...Somalia has a small government, Haiti has a small government and we see how they're.

 

[Libertary]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

How exactly is decreasing taxes to zero on the super rich and allowing monopolies to run everything = a better economy. Learn economics and you may understand why Rand Paul is bad.

I think it is very unfair if you take more than 40% of somebody's income. Rand Paul will not decrease the taxes to zero. Rand Paul did not say that he will allow monopolies.

I think it's fair, hell, take more, if someone is making millions while children are struggling to meet their needs and while people are homeless/millions lack healthcare..

I think this goals can be reached without taking people more than 40% of their income.

 

[Socialist]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

How exactly is decreasing taxes to zero on the super rich and allowing monopolies to run everything = a better economy. Learn economics and you may understand why Rand Paul is bad.

I think it is very unfair if you take more than 40% of somebody's income. Rand Paul will not decrease the taxes to zero. Rand Paul did not say that he will allow monopolies.

I think it's fair, hell, take more, if someone is making millions while children are struggling to meet their needs and while people are homeless/millions lack healthcare..

I think this goals can be reached without taking people more than 40% of their income.

How do you plan to fund it within our current system? We could cut the military spending...

 

[Contumacious]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

In order to be "electable" he has abandoned Libertarian principles - he even made a trip to TelAviv to be blessed by Bibi.


He is useless.


.

 

[blunthead]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

Define "liberal".

Liberal in economic points.

No, I mean what do you mean by "liberal"? Define the word as you understand it to mean. It's not a rhetorical question, I just wonder what the word means to you.

The opposite of the socialist state which Barack Obama has made.

Oh, okay. It's curious that modern Democrats claim the term "liberal" when they are anything but.

 

[ScienceRocks]

His views on women's rights, taxes.. Oh, and he's a right wing stooge.

Are you a commie?

How's the USSR doin today....

You lose....

Hows China, South Korea, Germany, Britain and Taiwan doing? You do know that they're social democracies with public sectors and their governments use the tax dollars on infrastructure?

People like you don't know shit. The 19th century slavery of the big corp is all you know.

They are such awesome countries I can't help but wonder why you don't live there....

Lol, slavery, big corp... are you for real?

Read up on the robber barons of the 19th century...I am glad we have civil rights and regulation on our economy.

 

[Socialist]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

Define "liberal".

Liberal in economic points.

No, I mean what do you mean by "liberal"? Define the word as you understand it to mean. It's not a rhetorical question, I just wonder what the word means to you.

The opposite of the socialist state which Barack Obama has made.

Oh, okay. It's curious that modern Democrats claim the term "liberal" when they are anything but.

You're right, liberalism is a disease and liberals need to be sent to siberian camps.

 

[Libertary]

Do you have any arguments against this? I think he can make the USA to a better national economy and a very liberal state.

How exactly is decreasing taxes to zero on the super rich and allowing monopolies to run everything = a better economy. Learn economics and you may understand why Rand Paul is bad.

I think it is very unfair if you take more than 40% of somebody's income. Rand Paul will not decrease the taxes to zero. Rand Paul did not say that he will allow monopolies.

I think it's fair, hell, take more, if someone is making millions while children are struggling to meet their needs and while people are homeless/millions lack healthcare..

I think this goals can be reached without taking people more than 40% of their income.

How do you plan to fund it within our current system? We could cut the military spending...

Rand Paul will cut the military spending.

 

[blunthead]

I've taken more then a few terms of political science and I can tell you that most first world countries are social democracies. What is a social democracy? It is a country with a public and private sector that has government regulating them.

The second most powerful nation earth is China, Germany, France, Japan, Britain,etc. What do all these successful nations have in common? They have government regulations and a public sector. Dispute it loons.

Small government hasn't done shit for anyone...Somalia has a small government, Haiti has a small government and we see how they're.

"Small" is relative. Of course a government has to be big enough. It just shouldn't be Big.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Please point out this loserterian super power??? Every single country with a large middle class is a social democracy with a regulated economy.

If you can't find one...Well, you should think about your opinions.

 

[Socialist]

How exactly is decreasing taxes to zero on the super rich and allowing monopolies to run everything = a better economy. Learn economics and you may understand why Rand Paul is bad.

I think it is very unfair if you take more than 40% of somebody's income. Rand Paul will not decrease the taxes to zero. Rand Paul did not say that he will allow monopolies.

I think it's fair, hell, take more, if someone is making millions while children are struggling to meet their needs and while people are homeless/millions lack healthcare..

I think this goals can be reached without taking people more than 40% of their income.

How do you plan to fund it within our current system? We could cut the military spending...

Rand Paul will cut the military spending.

Yeah, I seriously doubt that.. Have you seen his tax proposal? It's a fucking disaster. Have you seen what he has tried to do on women's rights?

 

[Socialist]

I've taken more then a few terms of political science and I can tell you that most first world countries are social democracies. What is a social democracy? It is a country with a public and private sector that has government regulating them.

The second most powerful nation earth is China, Germany, France, Japan, Britain,etc. What do all these successful nations have in common? They have government regulations and a public sector. Dispute it loons.

Small government hasn't done shit for anyone...Somalia has a small government, Haiti has a small government and we see how they're.

"Small" is relative. Of course a government has to be big enough. It just shouldn't be Big.

I'd rather have nationalization then capitalist stooges sucking up the resources.