Rand Paul: I'm Referring Fauci For Criminal Charges, and Here's the Proof He Lied to Congress

[badger2]

There’s another element which is quite important to Fauci’s history and his connection NIHID with NIH oversite (or apparently lack of) in particular. For reasons unknown to me at least at this time, NIH decided that the category of vaccine development would be outside of any type of investigations by their “extra layer” type of advisory/standard board. This measure goes beyond any rational thought imo. So NIH works under our executive branch and decides that their quality review will scrutinize all areas of research except for vaccine development and studying populations of diseases. Can anyone explain why they left those two categories out?

Do you have a citation handy?

 

[Faun]

Badger realizes that you have been taught where LYRa11 came from by reading posts from possibly in June, though your argument pro-Fau Chi is rife with holey-ness, and you give no credit for being taught about the bat that harbors SARS-CoV-2’ closest relative. Wuhan did not stop gain-of-function just because NIH did anything other than give them money or take the money away, which was the mistake Rand Paul is talking about. Duke-NUS Singapore will also be further scrutinized because the Obama-Biden administration funded it. LYRa11 enhances ACE2 naturally, without manipulation, and RaTG13 would certainly not pretend not to notice what its neighbor was doing. All Homo sapiens have two populations of viruses to be concerned with.

No matter how many times you mention it, LYRa11 will still have nothing to do with the NIH funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. All you accomplish is to expose your ignorance on the subject.

 

[Faun]

Just because a claim has been called false does not make the claim false.

It's false because you cannot prove otherwise.

 

[BlindBoo]

So, how are the criminal charges against Anthony coming?

 

[ClaireH]

Do you have a citation handy?

Yes, from US Department of Human Health and Services public disclosure documents.

https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf

There is little question that Fauci took the wrong road years before 2019. Evidence is mounting that he ignored warning calls from experts aware of the lethal risk, but instead chose to take a deliberate risk of human life that should not have been allowed to happen. National Institute of Health (over Fauci's NIAID's department) messed up majorly. They have questions to answer as well for their negligence.

"The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review."

"The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters. Does the rigorous process include vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance or not? From Collin's public statement alone, why exclude vaccine development? Why exclude epidemiological surveillance or does the journalist have it wrong?

Oddball posted Nature's article's link and the above link was there. US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes, from US Department of Human Health and Services public disclosure documents.

https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf

There is little question that Fauci took the wrong road years before 2019. Evidence is mounting that he ignored warning calls from experts aware of the lethal risk, but instead chose to take a deliberate risk of human life that should not have been allowed to happen. National Institute of Health (over Fauci's NIAID's department) messed up majorly. They have questions to answer as well for their negligence.

"The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review."

"The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters. Does the rigorous process include vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance or not? From Collin's public statement alone, why exclude vaccine development? Why exclude epidemiological surveillance or does the journalist have it wrong?

Oddball posted Nature's article's link and the above link was there. US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research

oooorrrr maybe you don't know what you are talking about in fields in which you have zero education or experience.

 

[MinTrut]

An MIT biologist as well as "the Bat Lady" herself says that Fauci's money did fund gain-of-function research at Wuhan.

Fauci insists that by his personal definition of gain-of-function -- a definition shared by no one else in virology -- this wasn't "gain-of-function."

It’s the old Clinton ‘a blow job isn't sex’ defense.

Would LOVE to see psychopath Fauci behind bars.

 

[badger2]

Yes, from US Department of Human Health and Services public disclosure documents.

https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf

There is little question that Fauci took the wrong road years before 2019. Evidence is mounting that he ignored warning calls from experts aware of the lethal risk, but instead chose to take a deliberate risk of human life that should not have been allowed to happen. National Institute of Health (over Fauci's NIAID's department) messed up majorly. They have questions to answer as well for their negligence.

"The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review."

"The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters. Does the rigorous process include vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance or not? From Collin's public statement alone, why exclude vaccine development? Why exclude epidemiological surveillance or does the journalist have it wrong?

Oddball posted Nature's article's link and the above link was there. US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research

We’ll now link civet vaccine to JoeXi’s Long Covid. It was OP Natural Citizen who started one Long Covid-JoeXi thread:
https://www.usmessageboard.com/thre...declares-long-covid-a-disability-eligible-for accommodation-under-civil-rights-law.909940/

This was the order in which we found thew links via searches and reading:

May 2021 Wuhan Renmin Hospital / Long Covid / Epstein-Barr Virus

Positive Epstein-Barr virus detection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients - PubMed

The objective of this study was to detect the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) coinfection in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this retrospective single-center study, we included 67 COVID-19 patients with onset time within 2 weeks in Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 9 to February...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

CTLA4, an immune check-point protein, is insufficient and decreased in EBV infection, and it links to Fau Chi’s desire to spearhead an HIV-1 vaccine:
CTLA4 / Immunodeficiency / NIH-NIAID Clinical GenomicS Program

Immune dysregulation in human subjects with heterozygous germline mutations in CTLA4 - PubMed

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is an inhibitory receptor found on immune cells. The consequences of mutations in CTLA4 in humans are unknown. We identified germline heterozygous mutations in CTLA4 in subjects with severe immune dysregulation from four unrelated families. Whereas Ctla4...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

’....critical quantitative for CTLA-4 in governing T and B lymphocyte homeostasis....GI biopsies revealed similar histopathology to CTLA-4 blocking antibodies in melanoma patients.’

2005 CTLA4Hinge SARS 800 DNA Vaccine

SARS coronavirus spike polypeptide DNA vaccine priming with recombinant spike polypeptide from Escherichia coli as booster induces high titer of neutralizing antibody against SARS coronavirus - PubMed

Different forms of SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike protein-based vaccines for generation of neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV were compared using a mouse model. High IgG levels were detected in mice immunized with intraperitoneal (i.p.) recombinant spike polypeptide generated by...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

2009 CTLA4 Vaccine / Civet Cats / SARS-CoV / Intraperitoneal S Peptide

An oral mucosal DNA vaccine for SARS coronavirus infections - PubMed

1. When different forms of SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) spike protein-based vaccines for generation of a neutralising antibody response to SARS-CoV were injected into a mouse model, all the mice immunised with intramuscular tPA-optimised 800 DNA vaccine boosted with intraperitoneal recombinant...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

’....This may have major practical value for field studies, such as the immunisation of civet cats, as the cost of recombinant proteins produced by E. Coli is much lower.’

The intraperitoneal S peptide links to powerful peritoneal macrophages that are activated during rabies vaccination, and we have already excerpted on feline infectious peritonitis virus on the Biological Politics thread.

Did JoeXi say his was the first Long COVID task force?
This is another one:
UK: Post-Hospitalization COVID-19 Study (PHOSP-COVID), which aims to recruit 10,000 patients.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Saw Fauci on TV, thought maybe he was getting arrested over this VERY SERIOUS matter.

Nope... He was just getting another lifetime achievement award for his work.

 

[badger2]

Biden administration declares long Covid a disability eligible for accommodation under civil rights law

It figures it'd be something like that. https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/doj-and-hhs-issue-guidance-long-covid-and-disability-rights-under-ada-section-504-and-section Guess we can expect cases to skyrocket. Heh heh. I believe that fund is actually bankrupt. Obama had previously moved a...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[badger2]

Dropping back in the chron:

2016 CTLA4 / HIV-1 Vaccine

CD4+ T Cells Expressing PD-1, TIGIT and LAG-3 Contribute to HIV Persistence during ART - PubMed

HIV persists in a small pool of latently infected cells despite antiretroviral therapy (ART). Identifying cellular markers expressed at the surface of these cells may lead to novel therapeutic strategies to reduce the size of the HIV reservoir. We hypothesized that CD4+ T cells expressing immune...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

’....7 immune checkpoint molecules (PD-1, CTLA4, LAG-3, TIGIT, Tim-3, CD160,and 2B4) as well as 4 markers of HIV persistence.’

We have already mentioned studies from Anderson Cancer Center on the Bio. Pol. Thread.

1998: Adjuvants

Immunoliposomes containing antibodies to costimulatory molecules as adjuvants for HIV subunit vaccines - PubMed

Immunoliposomes containing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the costimulatory molecules CD28 and CTLA4 and their counterreceptors B7-1 (CD80) and B7-2 (CD86) were evaluated for the ability to increase the immune response to recombinant envelope protein rgp120 of the MN strain of human...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[Nostra]

An MIT biologist as well as "the Bat Lady" herself says that Fauci's money did fund gain-of-function research at Wuhan.

Fauci insists that by his personal definition of gain-of-function -- a definition shared by no one else in virology -- this wasn't "gain-of-function."

It’s the old Clinton ‘a blow job isn't sex’ defense.

Good.

That little Hitler wannabe needs to go down.

 

[Nostra]

But Paul's only goal it to keep people from being vaccinated, that's his core support. The rest is just "show"

When Rand Paul was in the 7th Grade the girls used to regularly pants him on the playground because he was such a righteous effeminate twerp..

Poor Rand Paul had his ass kicked by his neighbor for running his big mouth. The other day Fauci gave Paulie Boy a beat down in that hearing. Poor Rand. 0-2.

First few Dimtard responses.................nothing about the obvious lies Fraudci has been caught in by Paul.

 

[badger2]

Yes, from US Department of Human Health and Services public disclosure documents.

https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf

There is little question that Fauci took the wrong road years before 2019. Evidence is mounting that he ignored warning calls from experts aware of the lethal risk, but instead chose to take a deliberate risk of human life that should not have been allowed to happen. National Institute of Health (over Fauci's NIAID's department) messed up majorly. They have questions to answer as well for their negligence.

"The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review."

"The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters. Does the rigorous process include vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance or not? From Collin's public statement alone, why exclude vaccine development? Why exclude epidemiological surveillance or does the journalist have it wrong?

Oddball posted Nature's article's link and the above link was there. US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research

The report mentions Kawaoka from UW Madison, but that’s for avian influenza GOF. We are just as interested in the COVID-19 29-nt study here at UW Madison, due to virulence implications of the deletions in the Delta variant.

Yes, from US Department of Human Health and Services public disclosure documents.

https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf

There is little question that Fauci took the wrong road years before 2019. Evidence is mounting that he ignored warning calls from experts aware of the lethal risk, but instead chose to take a deliberate risk of human life that should not have been allowed to happen. National Institute of Health (over Fauci's NIAID's department) messed up majorly. They have questions to answer as well for their negligence.

"The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review."

"The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters. Does the rigorous process include vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance or not? From Collin's public statement alone, why exclude vaccine development? Why exclude epidemiological surveillance or does the journalist have it wrong?

Oddball posted Nature's article's link and the above link was there. US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research

The above report mentions UW Madison’s Kawaoka for avian influenza, though we have a UW Madison study that much more accurately links to Fau Chi, HIV-1 (and SARS-CoV-2 [italics]). It also more accurately links why the CDC sanitized the P.1 Brazil-Japan mutation at position 417 of the spike protein, forthcoming.

 

[badger2]

The report mentions Kawaoka from UW Madison, but that’s for avian influenza GOF. We are just as interested in the COVID-19 29-nt study here at UW Madison, due to virulence implications of the deletions in the Delta variant.

The above report mentions UW Madison’s Kawaoka for avian influenza, though we have a UW Madison study that much more accurately links to Fau Chi, HIV-1 (and SARS-CoV-2 [italics]). It also more accurately links why the CDC sanitized the P.1 Brazil-Japan mutation at position 417 of the spike protein, forthcoming.

For those jumping ahead as we connect the dots, we’ll post a pertinent study that links to both Fau Chi’s HIV-1 vaccine and why the CDC may have tampered with the P.1 variant mutations on its website. (Env elements integrate into the coronavirus genome in nature.):

Oct 2020 Pangolin / SARS-CoV-2 / Overlapping Genes
(UW Global Health Institute, Madison, Wi.; American Museum of Natural History, N.Y.; Biodiversity Research Center, Tapei, Taiwan; Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany; SUNY Downstate Health Sciences, Brooklyn, N.Y.)

Dynamically evolving novel overlapping gene as a factor in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic - PubMed

Understanding the emergence of novel viruses requires an accurate and comprehensive annotation of their genomes. Overlapping genes (OLGs) are common in viruses and have been associated with pandemics but are still widely overlooked. We identify and characterize <i>ORF3d</i>, a novel OLG in...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

’....For example, in HIV-1 the novel OLG (overlapping gene) ASP within env is actively expressed in human cells....and is associated with pandemic M group lineage....’

The Brazil-Japan variant P.1 mutation was originally published on the CDC webpage as ’K417N/T’ which was subsequently changed to ‘K417T,’ which as originally published, contained all of the major amino acids involved in increasing the potency of fentany (asparagine 230 of the mu-opioid receptor), thus a hydrophobic/fentanyl link to these SARS-CoV-2 amino acids. This study is from JoeXi’s state:

2019 University of Maryland, Baltimore / Hydrophobic ASP (Hydrophobic Antisense Protein)

The HIV-1 Antisense Protein ASP Is a Transmembrane Protein of the Cell Surface and an Integral Protein of the Viral Envelope - PubMed

The negative strand of HIV-1 encodes a highly hydrophobic antisense protein (ASP) with no known homologs. The presence of humoral and cellular immune responses to ASP in HIV-1 patients indicates that ASP is expressed <i>in vivo</i>, but its role in HIV-1 replication remains unknown. We...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

’....hydrophobic antisense protein (ASP) with no known homologs....’

In Sep 2016, ASP also studied at Institut Pasteur:

Concomitant emergence of the antisense protein gene of HIV-1 and of the pandemic - PubMed

Recent experiments provide sound arguments in favor of the in vivo expression of the AntiSense Protein (ASP) of HIV-1. This putative protein is encoded on the antisense strand of the provirus genome and entirely overlapped by the env gene with reading frame -2. The existence of ASP was suggested...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[badger2]

Yes, from US Department of Human Health and Services public disclosure documents.

https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/p3co.pdf

There is little question that Fauci took the wrong road years before 2019. Evidence is mounting that he ignored warning calls from experts aware of the lethal risk, but instead chose to take a deliberate risk of human life that should not have been allowed to happen. National Institute of Health (over Fauci's NIAID's department) messed up majorly. They have questions to answer as well for their negligence.

"The new policy outlines a framework that the HHS will use to assess proposed research that would create pathogens with pandemic potential. Such work might involve modifying a virus to infect more species, or recreating a pathogen that has been eradicated in the wild, such as smallpox. There are some exceptions, however: vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance do not automatically trigger the HHS review."

"The goal is to standardize “a rigorous process that we really want to be sure we’re doing right”, NIH director Francis Collins told reporters. Does the rigorous process include vaccine development and epidemiological surveillance or not? From Collin's public statement alone, why exclude vaccine development? Why exclude epidemiological surveillance or does the journalist have it wrong?

Oddball posted Nature's article's link and the above link was there. US government lifts ban on risky pathogen research

The link Oddball supposedly posted does not contain references. There are also 21 studies to scrutinize, ten of these allowed to pass, three using MERS not allowed, eight using influenza not allowed. The way to synchronize chrons with Wuhan’s military connections is to document these 21 studies that hinge on acceptance or rejection.