Racists At It Again In Alabummer!

[Coloradomtnman]

The OP needs to take a chill pill and learn some respect for free speech and free association.

Has anyone in this thread demanded the removal of the sign?

Racists have the right to Free Speech, and we have the right to speak our ridicule of their bigotry and ignorance.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

Must shut down opposing voices at all costs.

Who said that?

The OP is saying it right now dumbass.

No where in the OP has he demanded that the message be removed, the billboard taken down, or those responsible to have their 1st Amendment rights restricted.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

The sweetest irony being, is that there's buildings and memorials comemorating the Holocaust (an attempted genocide perpetrated in another continent) across your country, yet everyone condemning this sign, which isn't racist by any stretch of the imagination, supports them.

Awww ... Are those mean ole gypsies trying to genocide your worthless hide?

OTOH, its nice to see you admit that white supremacists are slime sucking nazis.

The sign is not from white supremacists it is from White separatists, get your facts straight, then explain why when blacks want separate it is ok but when whites do it is racist?

Link to black people wanting to separate, please.

I thought we'd all figured out by now that black people didn't like that whole "separate but equal" thing cause it didn't actually mean equal. And that it's unconstitutional.

 

[reconmark]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Yeah, you gotta love people that fought for their very survival after nearly becoming extinct due to the inhumane treatment of the Europeans.

In Léogâne in 1772, a Haitian woman named Zabeth, her story recorded, lived a not uncommon life and death. Rebellious, like many, from childhood, she was chained for years when not working, chased and attacked by dogs when she escaped, her cheek branded with a fleur de lis. Zabeth was locked up in a sugar mill for punishment. She stuck her fingers in the grinder, then later bit off the bandages which stopped the flow of blood. She was then tied, her open wounds against the grinder, where particles of iron dust poisoned her blood before she died. Her owner lived unconcerned across the sea in Nantes.

The French colony of Saint-Domingue was one of the richest colonies in the world - known as the "Pearl of the Antilles". Enormous wealth was extracted through the implementation of a harsh system of slavery:
"Have they not hung up men with heads downward, drowned them in sacks, crucified them on planks, buried them alive, crushed them in mortars? Have they not forced them to consume faeces? And, having flayed them with the lash, have they not cast them alive to be devoured by worms, or onto anthills, or lashed them to stakes in the swamp to be devoured by mosquitoes? Have they not thrown them into boiling cauldrons of cane syrup? Have they not put men and women inside barrels studded with spikes and rolled them down mountainsides into the abyss? Have they not consigned these miserable blacks to man eating-dogs until the latter, sated by human flesh, left the mangled victims to be finished off with bayonet and poniard?"[5]


Haiti was reviled and feared by all the rich nations of the world precisely for its successful slave revolt which represented a threat not only in nations where slavery was legal, but in all countries, because of their large under-classes living in economic servitude. The strategy of the nations primarily affected, including the U.S., was to further impoverish Haiti, to make it an example. Racism in the hemisphere added a painful edge to the treatment of Haiti, which has remained the poorest country, with the darkest skin, the most isolated nation in the Americas. Even its language, spoken by so few beyond its borders, made Haiti the least accessible of countries and peoples.

 

[reconmark]

The sweetest irony being, is that there's buildings and memorials comemorating the Holocaust (an attempted genocide perpetrated in another continent) across your country, yet everyone condemning this sign, which isn't racist by any stretch of the imagination, supports them.

Awww ... Are those mean ole gypsies trying to genocide your worthless hide?

OTOH, its nice to see you admit that white supremacists are slime sucking nazis.

The sign is not from white supremacists it is from White separatists, get your facts straight, then explain why when blacks want separate it is ok but when whites do it is racist?

Link to black people wanting to separate, please.

I thought we'd all figured out by now that black people didn't like that whole "separate but equal" thing cause it didn't actually mean equal. And that it's unconstitutional.

Don't you know it's impolite to give another poster such a harsh internet ***** slap???

 

[DriftingSand]

85% of all blacks live within majority black areas in this country. Doesn't matter if it is the south or north portion of this country. Look at any racial map of this country and you will find that I am right.

People are happy this way.

Why is that? Think, please.

Why? The same reason that lions hang out with lions and hyenas hang out with hyenas. It's natural!

Lots of things are natural: rape, murder, pillage, barbarity for example. But God, through the Bible and The Son, attempts to raise man up from his baser instincts and civilize him.

Racism may be natural, but that doesn't make it right.

So are you saying that lions and hyenas should be forced to live together as opposed to their natural instinct? One doesn't necessarily have to hate the other to hang out with members of its own species. I don't hate blacks but I know better than to go into an all black neighborhood after dark. That would likely be suicide. Sorry for my realism but I prefer it over Socialist fantasies.

 

[DriftingSand]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Yeah, you gotta love people that fought for their very survival after nearly becoming extinct due to the inhumane treatment of the Europeans.

In Léogâne in 1772, a Haitian woman named Zabeth, her story recorded, lived a not uncommon life and death. Rebellious, like many, from childhood, she was chained for years when not working, chased and attacked by dogs when she escaped, her cheek branded with a fleur de lis. Zabeth was locked up in a sugar mill for punishment. She stuck her fingers in the grinder, then later bit off the bandages which stopped the flow of blood. She was then tied, her open wounds against the grinder, where particles of iron dust poisoned her blood before she died. Her owner lived unconcerned across the sea in Nantes.

The French colony of Saint-Domingue was one of the richest colonies in the world - known as the "Pearl of the Antilles". Enormous wealth was extracted through the implementation of a harsh system of slavery:
"Have they not hung up men with heads downward, drowned them in sacks, crucified them on planks, buried them alive, crushed them in mortars? Have they not forced them to consume faeces? And, having flayed them with the lash, have they not cast them alive to be devoured by worms, or onto anthills, or lashed them to stakes in the swamp to be devoured by mosquitoes? Have they not thrown them into boiling cauldrons of cane syrup? Have they not put men and women inside barrels studded with spikes and rolled them down mountainsides into the abyss? Have they not consigned these miserable blacks to man eating-dogs until the latter, sated by human flesh, left the mangled victims to be finished off with bayonet and poniard?"[5]


Haiti was reviled and feared by all the rich nations of the world precisely for its successful slave revolt which represented a threat not only in nations where slavery was legal, but in all countries, because of their large under-classes living in economic servitude. The strategy of the nations primarily affected, including the U.S., was to further impoverish Haiti, to make it an example. Racism in the hemisphere added a painful edge to the treatment of Haiti, which has remained the poorest country, with the darkest skin, the most isolated nation in the Americas. Even its language, spoken by so few beyond its borders, made Haiti the least accessible of countries and peoples.

So you're saying that it was OKAY for blacks to fight for their survival but it's RACIST if whites fight for theirs? Do me a favor: get your dictionary and look up the word HYPOCRISY. Thanks. Have a nice day.

 

[reconmark]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Yeah, you gotta love people that fought for their very survival after nearly becoming extinct due to the inhumane treatment of the Europeans.

In Léogâne in 1772, a Haitian woman named Zabeth, her story recorded, lived a not uncommon life and death. Rebellious, like many, from childhood, she was chained for years when not working, chased and attacked by dogs when she escaped, her cheek branded with a fleur de lis. Zabeth was locked up in a sugar mill for punishment. She stuck her fingers in the grinder, then later bit off the bandages which stopped the flow of blood. She was then tied, her open wounds against the grinder, where particles of iron dust poisoned her blood before she died. Her owner lived unconcerned across the sea in Nantes.

The French colony of Saint-Domingue was one of the richest colonies in the world - known as the "Pearl of the Antilles". Enormous wealth was extracted through the implementation of a harsh system of slavery:
"Have they not hung up men with heads downward, drowned them in sacks, crucified them on planks, buried them alive, crushed them in mortars? Have they not forced them to consume faeces? And, having flayed them with the lash, have they not cast them alive to be devoured by worms, or onto anthills, or lashed them to stakes in the swamp to be devoured by mosquitoes? Have they not thrown them into boiling cauldrons of cane syrup? Have they not put men and women inside barrels studded with spikes and rolled them down mountainsides into the abyss? Have they not consigned these miserable blacks to man eating-dogs until the latter, sated by human flesh, left the mangled victims to be finished off with bayonet and poniard?"[5]


Haiti was reviled and feared by all the rich nations of the world precisely for its successful slave revolt which represented a threat not only in nations where slavery was legal, but in all countries, because of their large under-classes living in economic servitude. The strategy of the nations primarily affected, including the U.S., was to further impoverish Haiti, to make it an example. Racism in the hemisphere added a painful edge to the treatment of Haiti, which has remained the poorest country, with the darkest skin, the most isolated nation in the Americas. Even its language, spoken by so few beyond its borders, made Haiti the least accessible of countries and peoples.

So you're saying that it was OKAY for blacks to fight for their survival but it's RACIST if whites fight for theirs? Do me a favor: get your dictionary and look up the word HYPOCRISY. Thanks. Have a nice day.

You really make white people...no,no, correction; human beings look stupid...smh.

First, post a link to where I stated that white people fighting for their survival was racist???..without that post, I call you a lying sack of shit.

Secondly, over 80% of Africans, Indians and mixed race people were murdered by Europeans in Haiti, now you attempt to compare their fight for survival with the whites wishes to continue their slavery and murder???

Like I said, you make humans look stupid...

 

[reconmark]

"Have they not hung up men with heads downward, drowned them in sacks, crucified them on planks, buried them alive, crushed them in mortars? Have they not forced them to consume faeces? And, having flayed them with the lash, have they not cast them alive to be devoured by worms, or onto anthills, or lashed them to stakes in the swamp to be devoured by mosquitoes? Have they not thrown them into boiling cauldrons of cane syrup? Have they not put men and women inside barrels studded with spikes and rolled them down mountainsides into the abyss? Have they not consigned these miserable blacks to man eating-dogs until the latter, sated by human flesh, left the mangled victims to be finished off with bayonet and poniard?"[5]

Who were these atrocities committed against and for what reason???...yeah I thought so.
Next time don't post a link that makes you the idiot!!!

 

[Coloradomtnman]

85% of all blacks live within majority black areas in this country. Doesn't matter if it is the south or north portion of this country. Look at any racial map of this country and you will find that I am right.

People are happy this way.

Why is that? Think, please.

Why? The same reason that lions hang out with lions and hyenas hang out with hyenas. It's natural!

Lots of things are natural: rape, murder, pillage, barbarity for example. But God, through the Bible and The Son, attempts to raise man up from his baser instincts and civilize him.

Racism may be natural, but that doesn't make it right.

So are you saying that lions and hyenas should be forced to live together as opposed to their natural instinct? One doesn't necessarily have to hate the other to hang out with members of its own species. I don't hate blacks but I know better than to go into an all black neighborhood after dark. That would likely be suicide. Sorry for my realism but I prefer it over Socialist fantasies.

Lions and hyenas? Faulty Analogy Department of Philosophy Texas State University

There are plenty of "all black neighborhoods" where blue collar and white collar black workers live and there is no more crime than in a white neighborhood.

And there are trailer parks no black person would ever visit at night.

Hang out with white people if you want. Be ethnocentric, no one is stopping you. Start preaching "white pride" as though its not code for "hate blacks", and you will be ridiculed and mocked as a bigot, and rightfully so.

Separate is not equal.

 

[Coloradomtnman]

"Have they not hung up men with heads downward, drowned them in sacks, crucified them on planks, buried them alive, crushed them in mortars? Have they not forced them to consume faeces? And, having flayed them with the lash, have they not cast them alive to be devoured by worms, or onto anthills, or lashed them to stakes in the swamp to be devoured by mosquitoes? Have they not thrown them into boiling cauldrons of cane syrup? Have they not put men and women inside barrels studded with spikes and rolled them down mountainsides into the abyss? Have they not consigned these miserable blacks to man eating-dogs until the latter, sated by human flesh, left the mangled victims to be finished off with bayonet and poniard?"[5]

Who were these atrocities committed against and for what reason???...yeah I thought so.
Next time don't post a link that makes you the idiot!!!

Oooooo, snap!

 

[Howey]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You do realize this was put up by a white supremacist group, right?

LOL.

1) It's an historical fact.
2) Wasn't aware that Wikipedia was a "racist group." Hahahahahahaha.

Ever hear of Idi Amin? He massacred millions of whites as well (and sometimes ate his victims).

No, dipshit. I was talking about the billboard. Goddam, you are one stupid ************.

 

[DriftingSand]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You do realize this was put up by a white supremacist group, right?

LOL.

1) It's an historical fact.
2) Wasn't aware that Wikipedia was a "racist group." Hahahahahahaha.

Ever hear of Idi Amin? He massacred millions of whites as well (and sometimes ate his victims).

No, dipshit. I was talking about the billboard. Goddam, you are one stupid ************.

If your spelling reflects your intelligence quotient then you clearly have no room to talk. Drinking too much "white Russian" I imagine.

 

[DriftingSand]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You do realize this was put up by a white supremacist group, right?

LOL.

1) It's an historical fact.
2) Wasn't aware that Wikipedia was a "racist group." Hahahahahahaha.

Ever hear of Idi Amin? He massacred millions of whites as well (and sometimes ate his victims).

No, dipshit. I was talking about the billboard. Goddam, you are one stupid ************.

Oh ... don't respond to a Wikipedia article with an inappropriate response. Be clear next time -- dumb-ass!

 

[Howey]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

The 1804 Haiti Massacre was a genocide, which was carried out against the remaining white population of French Creoles (or Franco-Haitians) in Haitiby the black population on the order of Jean-Jacques Dessalines. The massacre, which took place in the entire territory of Haiti, was carried out from early February 1804 until 22 April 1804, and resulted in the deaths of between 3,000 to 5,000 people of all ages and genders.[1]

Squads of soldiers moved from house to house, killing entire families.[2] Even whites who had been friendly and sympathetic to the black population were imprisoned and later killed.[3] A second wave of massacres targeted white women and children.[3]

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You do realize this was put up by a white supremacist group, right?

LOL.

1) It's an historical fact.
2) Wasn't aware that Wikipedia was a "racist group." Hahahahahahaha.

Ever hear of Idi Amin? He massacred millions of whites as well (and sometimes ate his victims).

No, dipshit. I was talking about the billboard. Goddam, you are one stupid ************.

Oh ... don't respond to a Wikipedia article with an inappropriate response. Be clear next time -- dumb-ass!

Intelligent people don't use Wiki as a source.

 

[DriftingSand]

Great sign. Some truth to it. I wonder if it was salvaged in Haiti:

1804 Haiti Massacre - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You do realize this was put up by a white supremacist group, right?

LOL.

1) It's an historical fact.
2) Wasn't aware that Wikipedia was a "racist group." Hahahahahahaha.

Ever hear of Idi Amin? He massacred millions of whites as well (and sometimes ate his victims).

No, dipshit. I was talking about the billboard. Goddam, you are one stupid ************.

Oh ... don't respond to a Wikipedia article with an inappropriate response. Be clear next time -- dumb-ass!

Intelligent people don't use Wiki as a source.

Well ... liberals don't anyway ... they prefer the Black Panthers newsletter. Got it.

But I'm pretty certain you would reject the truth regardless of the source.

 

[PredFan]

Must shut down opposing voices at all costs.

Not shut them down, but ridicule and mock them as they deserve.

Which is the same thing. Ridicule, mock, marginalize = shut them down.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Actually they are separatists, they want to separate the races. And I notice when blacks demand the same you do not go agog about them demanding separate areas.

Link, please.

First YOU provide a link to them being supremacists.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The sweetest irony being, is that there's buildings and memorials comemorating the Holocaust (an attempted genocide perpetrated in another continent) across your country, yet everyone condemning this sign, which isn't racist by any stretch of the imagination, supports them.

Awww ... Are those mean ole gypsies trying to genocide your worthless hide?

OTOH, its nice to see you admit that white supremacists are slime sucking nazis.

The sign is not from white supremacists it is from White separatists, get your facts straight, then explain why when blacks want separate it is ok but when whites do it is racist?

Link to black people wanting to separate, please.

I thought we'd all figured out by now that black people didn't like that whole "separate but equal" thing cause it didn't actually mean equal. And that it's unconstitutional.

Don't you know it's impolite to give another poster such a harsh internet ***** slap???

Ya cause after all we do not have blacks right on this board demanding separation. We do not have Blacks demanding whites not teach black history, blacks demanding their own dorms segregated from whites, demanding their own libraries on campus and their own study centers. Yup none of that happens at all. You sure did ***** slap me, yes indeed.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

I lived in Birmingham Alabama for 3 years, I never encountered racism from anyone down there but every once in a while you would see a sign like that pop up. Wierd.

I found people in Alabama to be overly nice to blacks in their dealings with them. Those angry old white racists Howey speaks of don't exist in the south anymore except in the Democrat Party. The nice ones are republicans and liberals can't prove otherwise, so they make up lies because it's'so important blacks continue hating some whites.