I'm a racist? WOW, based on WHAT?
I agreed with going after bin Laden in Afghanistan after 911. But Iraq was in the works 10 days into Bush's administration, 6 months before 911. Iraq was sold to the American people as a 'Crusade', painting "Muslims' as the enemy. And yes, I need proof of Saddam's ties to al Qaeda, because Saddam had no use for any powers outside of HIMSELF.
Our nation is somewhat sad, but weÂ’re angry. ThereÂ’s a certain level of blood lust, but we wonÂ’t let it drive our reaction. WeÂ’re steady, clear-eyed and patient, but pretty soon weÂ’ll have to start displaying scalps.
George W. Bush
Can you provide a link that proves that 10 days into his Administration Bush wanted to invade Iraq?
Yes, please read this link, and the associated materials as evidence that there were in fact ties between Al Queda and Saadam.
Saddam, Al Qaeda Did Collaborate, Documents Show - March 24, 2006 - The New York Sun
NEW documents discovered in 2006? We invaded Iraq in 2003 based on trumped up intel and a PNAC plan the
neoconservatives had been pushing for years in Washington...a preemptive, preventative war of ideology...
Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq - 60 Minutes - CBS News
Paul O'Neill was George Bush's first Treasury Secretary.
And what happened at President Bush's very first National Security Council meeting is one of O'Neill's most startling revelations.
“From the very beginning, there was a conviction, that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go,” says O’Neill, who adds that going after Saddam was topic "A" 10 days after the inauguration - eight months before Sept. 11.
“From the very first instance, it was about Iraq. It was about what we can do to change this regime,” says Suskind. “Day one, these things were laid and sealed.”
As treasury secretary, O'Neill was a permanent member of the National Security Council. He says in the book he was surprised at the meeting that questions such as "Why Saddam?" and "Why now?" were never asked.
"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The president saying ‘Go find me a way to do this,’" says O’Neill. “For me, the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a really huge leap.”
And that came up at this first meeting, says OÂ’Neill, who adds that the discussion of Iraq continued at the next National Security Council meeting two days later.
He got briefing materials under this cover sheet. “There are memos. One of them marked, secret, says, ‘Plan for post-Saddam Iraq,’" adds Suskind, who says that they discussed an occupation of Iraq in January and February of 2001. Based on his interviews with O'Neill and several other officials at the meetings, Suskind writes that the planning envisioned peacekeeping troops, war crimes tribunals, and even divvying up Iraq's oil wealth.
He obtained one Pentagon document, dated March 5, 2001, and entitled "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield contracts," which includes a map of potential areas for exploration.
“It talks about contractors around the world from, you know, 30-40 countries. And which ones have what intentions,” says Suskind. “On oil in Iraq.”
During the campaign, candidate Bush had criticized the Clinton-Gore Administration for being too interventionist: "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road. And I'm going to prevent that."
“The thing that's most surprising, I think, is how emphatically, from the very first, the administration had said ‘X’ during the campaign, but from the first day was often doing ‘Y,’” says Suskind. “Not just saying ‘Y,’ but actively moving toward the opposite of what they had said during the election.”
No mother would ever willingly sacrifice her sons for territorial gain, for economic advantage, for ideology.
Ronald Reagan
Preventive war was an invention of Hitler. Frankly, I would not even listen to anyone seriously that came and talked about such a thing.
Dwight D. Eisenhower