Race and Coronavirus

[EvMetro]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

Apparently?

Check with a licensed professional

 

[miketx]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

Apparently?

Check with a licensed professional

Oh she knows all.

 

[Zorro!]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

The plagues depopulated Europe for 3 centuries and the resulting population was much more resistant than the population that entered that terrible experience.

Coronavirus For All: Dems’ Plans Would Make Us Sick.

“Countries with single-payer health care have a more difficult time,” Sally Pipes, president of the Pacific Research Institute. “In the not-too-distant past, Canada and the United Kingdom have struggled to handle outbreaks of everything from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to the seasonal flu.”

Pipes says that “because these countries’ government-run, ‘Medicare-for-All’-style systems lack enough health care personnel, hospital beds and other resources to meet the needs of their populations even in good times,” an expanding health threat such as “a pandemic can stretch single-payer health care to its breaking point.”

A native of Canada who has firsthand experience with Canada’s socialist health care system, Pipes says currently overcrowded hospitals, a common occurrence in countries where demand for medical care is high because it’s “free,” “make quarantining patients difficult, if not impossible, in the midst of an outbreak.”

“Leaving someone with coronavirus in a hallway could expose countless patients and staff to the highly contagious pathogen.”

Expect the crowded conditions in Canada, Great Britain, and other countries where government controls health care to grow even more unmanageable as the sick, as well as those who don’t have coronavirus but are afraid they do, overwhelm providers and facilities.

Socialist health care systems discourage innovations in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices that save and improve lives. The companies that make drugs and devices have little incentive to develop the next generation of products when the government takes away their ability to profit from their work, which would happen under Medicare for All.

Medicare for All Means Innovation for None.

“A brief review of Medicare’s real-world results reveals a chief problem of socialized healthcare — its destruction of innovation,” Rich said, later adding:​

“Public health care has little incentive to introduce new technologies and prolong life.”​

Even without Medicare for All, or the presence of a single-payer regime, U.S. government regulators are already obstructing development of a coronavirus vaccine. Under DemocratsCare, want of treatments for all diseases and conditions will only get worse.

 

[EvMetro]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

The plagues depopulated Europe for 3 centuries and the resulting population was much more resistant than the population that entered that terrible experience.

Coronavirus For All: Dems’ Plans Would Make Us Sick.

“Countries with single-payer health care have a more difficult time,” Sally Pipes, president of the Pacific Research Institute. “In the not-too-distant past, Canada and the United Kingdom have struggled to handle outbreaks of everything from severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) to the seasonal flu.”

Pipes says that “because these countries’ government-run, ‘Medicare-for-All’-style systems lack enough health care personnel, hospital beds and other resources to meet the needs of their populations even in good times,” an expanding health threat such as “a pandemic can stretch single-payer health care to its breaking point.”

A native of Canada who has firsthand experience with Canada’s socialist health care system, Pipes says currently overcrowded hospitals, a common occurrence in countries where demand for medical care is high because it’s “free,” “make quarantining patients difficult, if not impossible, in the midst of an outbreak.”

“Leaving someone with coronavirus in a hallway could expose countless patients and staff to the highly contagious pathogen.”

Expect the crowded conditions in Canada, Great Britain, and other countries where government controls health care to grow even more unmanageable as the sick, as well as those who don’t have coronavirus but are afraid they do, overwhelm providers and facilities.

Socialist health care systems discourage innovations in the pharmaceuticals and medical devices that save and improve lives. The companies that make drugs and devices have little incentive to develop the next generation of products when the government takes away their ability to profit from their work, which would happen under Medicare for All.

Medicare for All Means Innovation for None.

“A brief review of Medicare’s real-world results reveals a chief problem of socialized healthcare — its destruction of innovation,” Rich said, later adding:​

“Public health care has little incentive to introduce new technologies and prolong life.”​

Even without Medicare for All, or the presence of a single-payer regime, U.S. government regulators are already obstructing development of a coronavirus vaccine. Under DemocratsCare, want of treatments for all diseases and conditions will only get worse.

Interesting, this makes sense.

 

[harmonica]

it's RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[EvMetro]

it's RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Lol, I think this may be why the msm is hiding that Asians have more to worry about than whites do.

 

[EvMetro]

It is pretty interesting how difficult it is to find the race of those who have gotten the virus, or those who have died from it. These statistics are very important, considering that this virus is race biased.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact it is unrelated to racial phenotypes)

 

[Zorro!]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

Great examples. And all of this is why raw statistics looking at things like race based on worldwide data are utterly worthless on their own for epidemiological purposes. But they're great for headlines.

 

[EvMetro]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

Great examples. And all of this is why raw statistics looking at things like race based on worldwide data are utterly worthless on their own for epidemiological purposes. But they're great for headlines.

The statistics could be of value if they are presented to those who are statistically at the highest risk. Perhaps if those races who are at higher risk are aware that they are, they may take extra precaution. Likewise, the races at the lowest races may become aloof.

 

[Osiris-ODS]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

Great examples. And all of this is why raw statistics looking at things like race based on worldwide data are utterly worthless on their own for epidemiological purposes. But they're great for headlines.

The statistics could be of value if they are presented to those who are statistically at the highest risk. Perhaps if those races who are at higher risk are aware that they are, they may take extra precaution. Likewise, the races at the lowest races may become aloof.

In our theoretical model, yes that could be a viable benefit for the high-risk group. In the real world, however, it's far more likely (if not absolutely certain) that it would be used irresponsibly, primarily to incite hysteria for shysters angling to profit or influence political opinion. As to the low risk group, that's dead-on accurate for both the model and real life LOL

 

[EvMetro]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

Great examples. And all of this is why raw statistics looking at things like race based on worldwide data are utterly worthless on their own for epidemiological purposes. But they're great for headlines.

The statistics could be of value if they are presented to those who are statistically at the highest risk. Perhaps if those races who are at higher risk are aware that they are, they may take extra precaution. Likewise, the races at the lowest races may become aloof.

In our theoretical model, yes that could be a viable benefit for the high-risk group. In the real world, however, it's far more likely (if not absolutely certain) that it would be used irresponsibly, primarily to incite hysteria for shysters angling to profit or influence political opinion. As to the low risk group, that's dead-on accurate for both the model and real life LOL

It looks like the covid 19 is already being heavily exploited for political and monetary gain. Might as well just make the world aware that that Asians are way more likely to get the virus than whites are.

 

[charwin95]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

100% true. I have business in China where they make 85% my consumables since 1990. I’ve traveled to Beijing many times. I also spoke Mandarin Chinese and Tagalog. My customer service after hours is in makati, Philippines.

But in the cities of China where there’s high rise condo or apartments or 3 to 5 star hotels they are more educated and cleaner compared to people in the province like Hunan where the Coronavirus hit hard..

In general provincial areas are dirty where kids run around with no pants and just poop right there on the sides.

Travel around the globe in my observations China is the dirtiest country in the world air is so thick followed by Bangladesh then India.

Sex in Asia. Asian women are not my type but I learned from their cultures they are not in to oral sex, multiple partners or anal. But here we have a high rate of anal and cervical cancer among white women.

 

[charwin95]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

Great examples. And all of this is why raw statistics looking at things like race based on worldwide data are utterly worthless on their own for epidemiological purposes. But they're great for headlines.

The statistics could be of value if they are presented to those who are statistically at the highest risk. Perhaps if those races who are at higher risk are aware that they are, they may take extra precaution. Likewise, the races at the lowest races may become aloof.

In our theoretical model, yes that could be a viable benefit for the high-risk group. In the real world, however, it's far more likely (if not absolutely certain) that it would be used irresponsibly, primarily to incite hysteria for shysters angling to profit or influence political opinion. As to the low risk group, that's dead-on accurate for both the model and real life LOL

It looks like the covid 19 is already being heavily exploited for political and monetary gain. Might as well just make the world aware that that Asians are way more likely to get the virus than whites are.

Yes and No.

Take a very sick Coronavirus patient in the middle.

Take a healthy 30 yo White Dude to his left. Distance of 1 feet.

Take a healthy 30 yo Asian Dude to his right. Same distance.

Let the sick patient cough right on their face left and right. I can assure you that both will get sick almost simultaneously.

We are cleaner and more sensitive but it doesn’t mean we are stronger. I go to casinos here in southern Ca saw lots of whites that doesn’t wash their hands after using the toilet.

 

[22lcidw]

So what do we need to reduce the chances of acquiring the disease? Disinfectant Spray, Vitamin C, Bleach, Masks, Goggles, Hand Sanitizer?

 

[jillian]

I would imagine that the msm and the left would go into meltdown at the thought that whites could be less likely to catch this than another race.

Here are a couple articles I pulled up on Bing

Romania develops Coronavirus Vaccine able to Cure White People only

Here is an article that explains why Coronavirus is more deadly to Asians than whites:

https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=2834860

ACE2 receptors in Asians : Bannedfromcoronavirus

Novel coronavirus: Could it be a racial bioweapon? : aznidentity

You just pulled that out of your butt

 

[Zorro!]

So what do we need to reduce the chances of acquiring the disease? Disinfectant Spray, Vitamin C, Bleach, Masks, Goggles, Hand Sanitizer?

I'm just doing the same things I do for Flu Season. And crack lots of jokes. When you are feeling under the weather tell the folks at work that you think you have a touch of the Corona Virus. It's an attention getter!

 

[EvMetro]

Apparently, some races are more likely to get the Coronavirus than others:

Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed

Whites may have a better deal here than Asians...

That is true of all corona viruses and influenza viruses to some extent. Viral pathogenesis for infectious diseases varies based on a variety of demographic factors, including race. Race-related variations are usually due to a genetic/inherited expression or absence of specific antibodies that affect the pathogenic mechanisms of that disease. Another reason for such variation could be prior exposure to a disease in geographic areas that are disproportionately populated by a certain race, which would result in those persons having antibodies that others would not (this is a common example of misleading epidemiological statistics, as statistically it appears that there is a correlation to race, but in fact there is not)

Sanitation is also a factor. Corona virus is spread by, and brace yourself this is a very vulgar though unfortunately accurate term: Anus to mouth transfer. We don't use human waste for fertilizer. We keep bathrooms fairly clean. We wash our hands carefully before handling food. We have vented sewer systems that tend to be in good repair.

We also have some of the cleanest air on the planet and lower smoking rates than the heavily polluted heavy smoking Asian countries, so our lungs tend to be much healthier condition ahead of the challenge. And then of course you are right, we also tend to be more resistant to disease than the average person, I believe because we are descended from Europeans that were hit so hard by the plagues that Europe lost population for 3 centuries, the people that emerged from that horror were different from those that entered it, and we benefit from those centuries of heavy selection borne by our ancestors.

Great examples. And all of this is why raw statistics looking at things like race based on worldwide data are utterly worthless on their own for epidemiological purposes. But they're great for headlines.

The statistics could be of value if they are presented to those who are statistically at the highest risk. Perhaps if those races who are at higher risk are aware that they are, they may take extra precaution. Likewise, the races at the lowest races may become aloof.

In our theoretical model, yes that could be a viable benefit for the high-risk group. In the real world, however, it's far more likely (if not absolutely certain) that it would be used irresponsibly, primarily to incite hysteria for shysters angling to profit or influence political opinion. As to the low risk group, that's dead-on accurate for both the model and real life LOL

It looks like the covid 19 is already being heavily exploited for political and monetary gain. Might as well just make the world aware that that Asians are way more likely to get the virus than whites are.

Yes and No.

Take a very sick Coronavirus patient in the middle.

Take a healthy 30 yo White Dude to his left. Distance of 1 feet.

Take a healthy 30 yo Asian Dude to his right. Same distance.

Let the sick patient cough right on their face left and right. I can assure you that both will get sick almost simultaneously.

We are cleaner and more sensitive but it doesn’t mean we are stronger. I go to casinos here in southern Ca saw lots of whites that doesn’t wash their hands after using the toilet.

I have read, and I have left links to in this thread, that it is the ace2 receptor in the lungs that makes one less or more able to get the virus. Apparently, asians and whites have different amounts of this ace2 receptor, and the amount whites have make them less vulnerable. I don't doubt that cleanliness is important, but it sounds like the actual genetic vulnerability varies between races.

 

[EvMetro]

I would imagine that the msm and the left would go into meltdown at the thought that whites could be less likely to catch this than another race.

Here are a couple articles I pulled up on Bing

Romania develops Coronavirus Vaccine able to Cure White People only

Here is an article that explains why Coronavirus is more deadly to Asians than whites:

https://boxden.com/showthread.php?t=2834860

ACE2 receptors in Asians : Bannedfromcoronavirus

Novel coronavirus: Could it be a racial bioweapon? : aznidentity

You just pulled that out of your butt

Those links should work, they actually came from the internet.