Sure, there is a certain logic to the fact, if no one had guns, no one would get shot. But that is not the world we live in today. I'm sure your truely sorry for the 50 people who got killed and the others who were terribly injured as are most people on a human level. fact of the matter is though, I can see also the logic of the "right wingers" , if Hillary had her way and could create gun free zones everywhere, you would have more of these massacres. Its because Islamic extremists are ramping up and if anything its going to get worse no matter who the Pres is going to be. If we were dissarmed, there would be a weapons black market ready to fill the void, well, its already there. The same cartels who supply the drugs can easily supply weapons of any kind.
You see, although I partially agree with you what you end your post with drives me NUTS.....
NO ONE is saying "DISARM"...all that some of us are staing is that military=style weapons who can kill many in short amounts of time have NO place in a civilized society.....On a battle filed, YES......in deer hunting, NO !!!
(BTW, Hillary did not dictate a :gun free zone" at thevenue where republican will have their convention....Right wingers themselves have CHOSEN to host their convention in a gun free zone....Sure, they'll tell you its out of theirhands.....but that would make them hypocritical liars.)