Questions for Republicans, Conservatives, RINOs, Tea Partiers, et al:

[JakeStarkey]

The right is divided into so many factions till they are hard to keep up with.

Not really.... there are rwo actual groups Traditional Conservatives and Worthless Sack of Shit Liberals. Everything else is just semantics.

No traditional Conservative would associate with Anathema, so that leaves him being . . . what he said.

 

[jon_berzerk]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
.

i disagree that cruz isn't establishment.

full blown establishment guy

 

[candycorn]

Terrorists already mess with us when we have the largest, most lethal, most capable military ever fielded. There is no chance a blue blood from NY with 0.00 days in uniform will change the balance. And, no, "leadership" won't do it either.

But we really don't. Our military is in shambles compared to what it was just a decade ago. Our air force and navy have not been this small since WWII. We have ships, submarines and aircraft that are frankly obsolete. But beyond that, we have an administration who is committed to dismantling our military and not using it to it's full potential on the world stage.

I'm not a Trump supporter and I don't know how Trump would actually be on this other than what he says right now on the campaign trail... but I agree with what he is saying here. IF we went after the terrorists in a smart and effective way with the technological advantages we have, they would stand NO chance in hell and they wouldn't mess with us.

One thing you have to know about dealing with radical Islam and these terrorist elements... the thing they respect is strength and power. You must demonstrate that you're not afraid to kill them dead... every last one of them and in no uncertain terms. You can't go wobbly and start trying to appease and negotiate diplomatically... that is a recipe for disaster. Go after them with both barrels, don't let up, don't back down, kill the sons of bitches unapologetically, and be relentless in killing them... and something fascinating starts to happen there... they suddenly realize it's a losing proposition and they back down. Unfortunately, our leadership simply hasn't understood this... and that includes republican leadership as well.

Shambles? Oh...ok

 

[washamericom]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
.

i disagree that cruz isn't establishment.

oh honey... lol

he might still be establishment in canada though. heh

thanks harper.

You're welcome!

if cruz strikes out here can he be prime minister, or secretary of hockey or something ?

what about bernie, cause vermont's right next door here and you guys love the socialists...
and you guys haven't lived till you try the clintons. we want to be your best neighbors.

 

[Desperado]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
Trump over Hillary or Bernie
If Cruz I would sit this one out.

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
Kasich over Hillary or Bernie
If Rubio I would again sit this one out

 

[Avatar4321]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
.

The only person I have problems with right now is Trump because he isn't a conservative in the slightest

 

[Boss]

Terrorists already mess with us when we have the largest, most lethal, most capable military ever fielded. There is no chance a blue blood from NY with 0.00 days in uniform will change the balance. And, no, "leadership" won't do it either.

But we really don't. Our military is in shambles compared to what it was just a decade ago. Our air force and navy have not been this small since WWII. We have ships, submarines and aircraft that are frankly obsolete. But beyond that, we have an administration who is committed to dismantling our military and not using it to it's full potential on the world stage.

I'm not a Trump supporter and I don't know how Trump would actually be on this other than what he says right now on the campaign trail... but I agree with what he is saying here. IF we went after the terrorists in a smart and effective way with the technological advantages we have, they would stand NO chance in hell and they wouldn't mess with us.

One thing you have to know about dealing with radical Islam and these terrorist elements... the thing they respect is strength and power. You must demonstrate that you're not afraid to kill them dead... every last one of them and in no uncertain terms. You can't go wobbly and start trying to appease and negotiate diplomatically... that is a recipe for disaster. Go after them with both barrels, don't let up, don't back down, kill the sons of bitches unapologetically, and be relentless in killing them... and something fascinating starts to happen there... they suddenly realize it's a losing proposition and they back down. Unfortunately, our leadership simply hasn't understood this... and that includes republican leadership as well.

Shambles? Oh...ok

Wow... you read my post all the way to the 9th word... that's pretty good for a libtard!

 

[candycorn]

Terrorists already mess with us when we have the largest, most lethal, most capable military ever fielded. There is no chance a blue blood from NY with 0.00 days in uniform will change the balance. And, no, "leadership" won't do it either.

But we really don't. Our military is in shambles compared to what it was just a decade ago. Our air force and navy have not been this small since WWII. We have ships, submarines and aircraft that are frankly obsolete. But beyond that, we have an administration who is committed to dismantling our military and not using it to it's full potential on the world stage.

I'm not a Trump supporter and I don't know how Trump would actually be on this other than what he says right now on the campaign trail... but I agree with what he is saying here. IF we went after the terrorists in a smart and effective way with the technological advantages we have, they would stand NO chance in hell and they wouldn't mess with us.

One thing you have to know about dealing with radical Islam and these terrorist elements... the thing they respect is strength and power. You must demonstrate that you're not afraid to kill them dead... every last one of them and in no uncertain terms. You can't go wobbly and start trying to appease and negotiate diplomatically... that is a recipe for disaster. Go after them with both barrels, don't let up, don't back down, kill the sons of bitches unapologetically, and be relentless in killing them... and something fascinating starts to happen there... they suddenly realize it's a losing proposition and they back down. Unfortunately, our leadership simply hasn't understood this... and that includes republican leadership as well.

Shambles? Oh...ok

Wow... you read my post all the way to the 9th word... that's pretty good for a libtard!

I stop reading when the bullshit becomes too much. Nine words is a record for you.

 

[Anathema]

No traditional Conservative would associate with Anathema, so that leaves him being . . . what he said.

LOL. You're not thinking Traditional enough..... I'm talking Genghis Khan and William the Conqueror, not some 18th Century traditionalism.

 

[Boss]

I stop reading when the bullshit becomes too much. Nine words is a record for you.

Problem is, you stop comprehending 15 minutes before you start reading.

 

[candycorn]

I stop reading when the bullshit becomes too much. Nine words is a record for you.

Problem is, you stop comprehending 15 minutes before you start reading.

Some people are worth the effort...you're the exception.

 

[jillian]

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers: If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

No. Not under any circumstances. We've made ut clear over the last 2 Presidential Elections that we will not support a non-Conservative candidate. The Republican Party can now stew in its own blood if they still haven't gotten the message.

that's false. conservatives voted for romney while holding their noses. but they voted. this fantasy that if an extremist is nominated that suddenly enough of "the base" will vote to carry an extremist rightwinger to the presidency is fantasy.

Actually a lot of republicans chose not to vote for Romney in the last presidential election. Put a liberal up as your nominee and you are certain to pay for it on Election Day.

you can pretend that's true.

he was only a "liberal" in rightwingnuthackworld. but feel free to tell me how someone running on an anti-choice, theocratic, pro top 1%, anti poor anti social justice etc platform is a liberal.

we'll wait.

 

[Muhammed]

I think both Trump and Kasich would do a good job as president.

Trump/Kasich 2016.

 

[whitehall]

The last forlorn hope of a party that has drifted so far to the left that it has lost it's relevance is to try to split the republicans. Ho hum.

 

[BULLDOG]

The right is divided into so many factions till they are hard to keep up with.

Not really.... there are rwo actual groups Traditional Conservatives and Worthless Sack of Shit Liberals. Everything else is just semantics.

You're trying to say there are liberal right wingers? That's pretty dumb, don't you think?

 

[Boss]

You're trying to say there are liberal right wingers? That's pretty dumb, don't you think?

Not sure about "right wingers" but there are certainly some liberal conservatives.
Bill Clinton would probably be the most notable example.

 

[hunarcy]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
.

I'll vote for a 3 legged dog before I vote for whoever the Democrats offer up this year.

 

[BULLDOG]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
.

I'll vote for a 3 legged dog before I vote for whoever the Democrats offer up this year.

Of course you would. There always a few crazies who write in all kinds of crazy people and things.things. Pat Paulson still receives lots of votes every election.

 

[hunarcy]

For Republicans and RINO's:
If an anti-establishment candidate (like Trump or Cruz) gets nominated, will you vote for him?

For Conservatives and Tea Partiers:
If an establishment candidate (Rubio or, uh, Kasich) gets nominated, will you vote for him?
.

I'll vote for a 3 legged dog before I vote for whoever the Democrats offer up this year.

Of course you would. There always a few crazies who write in all kinds of crazy people and things.things. Pat Paulson still receives lots of votes every election.

And you fools seem poised to nominate one of two old white folks who have no new ideas, just hopes to create a socialist utopia here in the United States. Neither will win the general election.

 

[Fang]

I will vote for any GOP candidate over the Liar or the Socialist.