Questions For Evolutionists.

[ReinyDays]

But didn’t you just say exactly that?

No ... where do you think I posted the word "intelligent" ... my only claim is that successful traits are "selected" ... artificial selection has human intelligence behind it ... natural selection apparently does not ... but research continues ...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For me personally, the Bible is all I require.

And there you have it.

So what did you hope to accomplish? You cannot be persuaded. Your mind is shut.

Just here to crap on ideas? Or, here to get crapped on?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

God made many people probably before Adam and when he created all sorts of animal life.

Adam did not exist. It's a demonstrably false myth.

In fact, there is no such thing as a "first human" at all. That is not how evolution works.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ah yes. "The Big Bang." I was wondering when that imaginative hypothesis would rear is comedic head.

Exhibit A

 

[postman]

No ... where do you think I posted the word "intelligent" ... my only claim is that successful traits are "selected" ... artificial selection has human intelligence behind it ... natural selection apparently does not ... but research continues ...

You will need to define successful, as bigger is not always better, and advantages in one environment, could be liabilities in another.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You will need to define successful, as bigger is not always better, and advantages in one environment, could be liabilities in another.

No he doesn't. Traits "selected for" are by definition, successful.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Adam did not exist. It's a demonstrably false myth.

In fact, there is no such thing as a "first human" at all. That is not how evolution works.

No one claims Adam was the first human God clearly made other humans when he made all the animals. Adam was a perfect Human until his fall.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Lots of evidence of Intelligent Design.

When I look at a car engine, I know instinctively that it was designed by an intelligent individual. When I look at the far more intricate eyeball or living cell, I also know instinctively that it was designed by an intelligent mind. That's just common sense.

Your instinct isn't evidence.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Your instinct isn't evidence.

you call THIS evidence? An Evolutionary Timeline of Homo Sapiens lol a hell of a lot of guessing and assumptions and you claim it is more informative than religion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

No one claims Adam was the first human God clearly made other humans when he made all the animals.

Excepr the bible.

There was no first human at all.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

There was no first human at all.

So what? There was no first anything either in science or religion.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So what? There was no first anything either in science or religion.

Except in the silly bible creation myth.

And if you say God created other humans, one of them had to be first.

Your myth doesn't hold up.

 

[Robert W]

Self-Evolution

Wings first appeared as extra legs that made animals run faster. So more of them would survive, and the legs would soon become wings. Again, I have to believe that those animals chose to become birds. They would unconsciously choose mutations that gave them full wings and suppress any (internal and individual) mutations that interfered with that desire.

When what we ask for is just science, what we get in return is just speculation. That is fine so long as the speculation is likely accurate. Take Penguins for instance. They have wings yet do not fly. When will they start flying?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No ... where do you think I posted the word "intelligent" ... my only claim is that successful traits are "selected" ... artificial selection has human intelligence behind it ... natural selection apparently does not ... but research continues ...

Sorry...why are any traits "selected" in a random Universe?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Except in the silly bible creation myth.

And if you say God created other humans, one of them had to be first.

Your myth doesn't hold up.

Sorry but God created them all and there is no need to identify a first,

 

[CrusaderFrank]

In the barnyard ... of course ... this is what's called "artificial selection" ... we select for the best wool ... or mutton ... ask the farmer and usually they'll be glad to tell you about about what they're selecting for ...

Reproductive capacities is what nature selects for ... not intelligence ... the mutation that allows better reproduction need only occur once, after so many generations this mutation will dominate the entire population ... and we're clear how this happens on the molecular level ... how DNA unzips and mRNA forms against the exposed surfaces, how tRNA brings in amino acid units and strings them together as proteins ... including reproductive hormones ...

Evolution is just a theory ... a hypothesis ... a belief system designed to make money ... a scientific way to make better wool ...

Sounds crazy to believe that unzipping DNA and reproduction would occur in a random Universe

 

[SaxonJackson]

Your instinct isn't evidence.

Nor is yours. God's handiwork, on the other hand, is. Intricate machines and structures don't build themselves. Contrary to popular belief.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Exhibit A

Exhibit A (followed by complete emptiness). My point exactly!!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

When what we ask for is just science, what we get in return is just speculation. That is fine so long as the speculation is likely accurate. Take Penguins for instance. They have wings yet do not fly. When will they start flying?

Their ancestors flew. 7th graders learn this.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Exhibit A (followed by complete emptiness). My point exactly!!

You don't have any points. You have dishonest, dumb questions and an alleged divine decree that you possess infallible truth. Like any nutter on the corner with a bullhorn and a sandwich board.