The media has done its best to make gun controls about keeping guns out of the hands of criminals and insane criminals when its always been about confiscation.
Before confiscation can began Socialists must overcome one major hurdle: How to confiscate without repealing the Second Amendment. UBC (Universal Background Checks) comes up as the only way to get it done. Once the government knows where the guns are located confiscation can begin incrementally.
Be forewarned
No less of a liberal than Ruth Ginsburg says that Roe v. Wade should have been left to the states. Thats another debate. My point in this thread: The sneaks are trying to say the same thing about gun control laws. The fact is that no state can overturn the Constitution. If individual states like Connecticut et al. can pass laws that effectively abolish the Second Amendment there is no Constitution.
I dont know what is happening in Connecticut. The media is reporting that Connecticut is about to pass The toughest gun control law to date as though its a godsend.
I do know that the type of guns and ammo clips the government usually tries to ban runs into a lot of resistence in addition to the constitutional challenges that would surely follow. So all pretenses about rifles and ammo clips being the number one priority have been relegated to second place behind UBC. Universal background checks was always the primary goal; now its out in the open:
I offer 2 answers to the questions posed by the liar in chief:
1. Because the number of dangerous people is miniscule when compared to the number of butchers in government who are using background checks to disarm tens of millions of law-abiding American gun owners.
2.
Finally, the current bunch of bloodthirsty gun control advocates in the White House should be reminded of JFKs famous observation:
p.s. I said bloodthirsty with good reason. The minute Culture of Death architects disarm those Americans who are willing to fight for their freedoms the slaughter of all Americans will commence.
Before confiscation can began Socialists must overcome one major hurdle: How to confiscate without repealing the Second Amendment. UBC (Universal Background Checks) comes up as the only way to get it done. Once the government knows where the guns are located confiscation can begin incrementally.
Be forewarned
No less of a liberal than Ruth Ginsburg says that Roe v. Wade should have been left to the states. Thats another debate. My point in this thread: The sneaks are trying to say the same thing about gun control laws. The fact is that no state can overturn the Constitution. If individual states like Connecticut et al. can pass laws that effectively abolish the Second Amendment there is no Constitution.
I dont know what is happening in Connecticut. The media is reporting that Connecticut is about to pass The toughest gun control law to date as though its a godsend.
I do know that the type of guns and ammo clips the government usually tries to ban runs into a lot of resistence in addition to the constitutional challenges that would surely follow. So all pretenses about rifles and ammo clips being the number one priority have been relegated to second place behind UBC. Universal background checks was always the primary goal; now its out in the open:
I offer 2 answers to the questions posed by the liar in chief:
1. Because the number of dangerous people is miniscule when compared to the number of butchers in government who are using background checks to disarm tens of millions of law-abiding American gun owners.
2.
Finally, the current bunch of bloodthirsty gun control advocates in the White House should be reminded of JFKs famous observation:
p.s. I said bloodthirsty with good reason. The minute Culture of Death architects disarm those Americans who are willing to fight for their freedoms the slaughter of all Americans will commence.
