Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
I have no idea what the unidentified "Left" for whom you are the spokesperson is OK or not OK with, but if you could cite any specific examples of free speech being deprived or employment terminated because of political views, we could cross over into reality and address them.So the Left is perfectly OK with corporations censoring conservatives based on their political views on social media. If so, then what is to stop them from hiring and firing employees only based on their political views?
Could a conservative boss, for example, fire all his liberal employees?
Would there be any violation of their "rights"?
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
I'm sure you and many others have your own solutions to every problem. Unfortunately, our laws don't necessarily currently reflect your solutions.When you sign up on Facebook, you are contractually bound to their terms of service. Don't agree to that contract, you aren't allowed to sign up.Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
If they can censor, they should be held liable for the content on their site. It is that simple.
You want to quote the law that says that?
I am saying that Facebook is not the free press if they are going to censor. Just give every business Section 230 protection of some sort if we are going to give it to them. I have a feeling lawyers would be very unhappy.
So you've got nothing to back up your claims, right?When you sign up on Facebook, you are contractually bound to their terms of service. Don't agree to that contract, you aren't allowed to sign up.Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
If they can censor, they should be held liable for the content on their site. It is that simple.
You want to quote the law that says that?
FCC regulations are volumes.
I used to have copies, but I don't anymore.
You will just have to take my word for it, that the internet is not exempt from the same protection of rights that all public media have to follow.
Facebook owns no part of the internet, at all, in any way.
They are users just like you and me.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
I'm sure you and many others have your own solutions to every problem. Unfortunately, our laws don't necessarily currently reflect your solutions.When you sign up on Facebook, you are contractually bound to their terms of service. Don't agree to that contract, you aren't allowed to sign up.Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
If they can censor, they should be held liable for the content on their site. It is that simple.
You want to quote the law that says that?
I am saying that Facebook is not the free press if they are going to censor. Just give every business Section 230 protection of some sort if we are going to give it to them. I have a feeling lawyers would be very unhappy.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
RIght back to where we started. Understanding something is legal is NOT the same thing as supporting something. I fully understand that the KKK can use the public square to spout their bile. It does not mean I support them doing that.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
RIght back to where we started. Understanding something is legal is NOT the same thing as supporting something. I fully understand that the KKK can use the public square to spout their bile. It does not mean I support them doing that.
So you believe Facebook and Twitter have been acting in “good faith”? That is a requirement per Section 230.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
RIght back to where we started. Understanding something is legal is NOT the same thing as supporting something. I fully understand that the KKK can use the public square to spout their bile. It does not mean I support them doing that.
So you believe Facebook and Twitter have been acting in “good faith”? That is a requirement per Section 230.
A vague worthless statement. I believe it's their playground and can act as they wish. If I do not like it, I go elsewhere.
Just because the KKK is holding a rally in the public square does not mean I have to go and listen.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
RIght back to where we started. Understanding something is legal is NOT the same thing as supporting something. I fully understand that the KKK can use the public square to spout their bile. It does not mean I support them doing that.
So you believe Facebook and Twitter have been acting in “good faith”? That is a requirement per Section 230.
A vague worthless statement. I believe it's their playground and can act as they wish. If I do not like it, I go elsewhere.
Just because the KKK is holding a rally in the public square does not mean I have to go and listen.
If they aren’t acting in “good faith”, which they clearly aren’t according to the legal definition, then they are violating Section 230. That is far from a vague and worthless statement.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
RIght back to where we started. Understanding something is legal is NOT the same thing as supporting something. I fully understand that the KKK can use the public square to spout their bile. It does not mean I support them doing that.
So you believe Facebook and Twitter have been acting in “good faith”? That is a requirement per Section 230.
A vague worthless statement. I believe it's their playground and can act as they wish. If I do not like it, I go elsewhere.
Just because the KKK is holding a rally in the public square does not mean I have to go and listen.
If they aren’t acting in “good faith”, which they clearly aren’t according to the legal definition, then they are violating Section 230. That is far from a vague and worthless statement.
How high is high? File a lawsuit. Good luck.
Show us, with a link, the FCC agreement and terms of service....When you sign up on Facebook, you are contractually bound to their terms of service. Don't agree to that contract, you aren't allowed to sign up.Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
Wrong.
When Facebook signed up to connect their hardware to the Internet, it is Facebook that became bound by the FCC terms of service.
Facebook does not get to set terms of service that are not compatible with the FCC terms of service.
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
RIght back to where we started. Understanding something is legal is NOT the same thing as supporting something. I fully understand that the KKK can use the public square to spout their bile. It does not mean I support them doing that.
So you believe Facebook and Twitter have been acting in “good faith”? That is a requirement per Section 230.
A vague worthless statement. I believe it's their playground and can act as they wish. If I do not like it, I go elsewhere.
Just because the KKK is holding a rally in the public square does not mean I have to go and listen.
If they aren’t acting in “good faith”, which they clearly aren’t according to the legal definition, then they are violating Section 230. That is far from a vague and worthless statement.
How high is high? File a lawsuit. Good luck.
There will be changes to Section 230 unless the Democrats get full control of the Supreme Court and add activist judges. I don’t have to file a lawsuit. The SC will take care of it because the reading is very clear and these news outlets are clearly in violation.
Like I said, I am perfectly fine with the censoring Republicans all they want, but they shouldn’t have Section 230 protection if they are going to do so since they are clearly in violation. Remove that protection, censor all they want and hire a larger team of attorneys.
Personally I think everything should fly on Facebook, even the rants and lies, unless the mods see it as harmful, dangerous...Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
Except that any edits must be done in good faith. Good faith means “ a sincere belief of motive without malice or the desire to defraud others.” That point is extremely debatable as clearly there is a motive and malice towards Trump and Republicans in general.
There is no "good faith" clauses. File a lawsuit.
Maybe you should read Section 230..
2A - any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected
File a lawsuit.
The point is that it is wrong. You don’t seem to care because you like the results. You feel the new GA voting law is likely wrong. Instead of attempting to argue for its merits, I could simply say “file a lawsuit”. See how that works?
There’s no federal law against employment discrimination based on politics. Only a handful of states protect this.So the Left is perfectly OK with corporations censoring conservatives based on their political views on social media. If so, then what is to stop them from hiring and firing employees only based on their political views?
Could a conservative boss, for example, fire all his liberal employees?
Would there be any violation of their "rights"?
Conservatives should censor themselves. Normal people don't have a problem stating their views without running afoul of the rules. If you can't be a conservative without violent or racist rhetoric or dangerous lies then that's a problem with your ideology.
Any speech that is not in line with the left if considered racist and dangerous. I don’t agree with affirmative action policies. I think they are the epitome of reverse racism. Facebook could sensor me if they wanted for that.
Facebook can sensor who they like, but if so, they cannot be afforded section 230 protection. They want their cake and be able to eat it too.
It is not legal for Facebook to censor who they like.
They can only legally censor based on what could be harmful to the rights of others.
Just because no one is prosecuting Facebook, does not mean its legal.
You have no "rights" on Facebook outside of those they grant.
Nonsense.
Facebook owns nothing and maintains nothing.
Facebook is using the internet, so then is required to follow the fair use regulations established for the internet.
You have the same rights of fair use of Facebook as Blacks do at a lunch counter in Alabama.
No one open to the public can legally discriminate.
You have rights everywhere that everyone has to abide by.
If a customer at a counter starts cussing out other customers they can be booted.
That may be true, but it would not then be arbitrary, but in defense of their business to not be harmed by one customer chasing away others.
Facebook will argue that deleting lies is not arbitrary either.
And that would be extremely easy to counter as lies from both sides are not deleted. How many lies were posted about Trump on Facebook? My God, where to start.
It's their call, not yours.
Not if they are afforded Section 230 protection.
File a lawsuit.
Courts have held that Section 230 prevents you from being held liable even if you exercise the usual prerogative of publishers to edit the material you publish.
Section 230 Protections
