I keep trying to figure out what you could possibly be getting from the Democrats that would make it worth sounding like such an utter, laughable flatliner in public with no apparent shame whatsoever, and I just can't even imagine.
Whatever the compensation, let me just congratulate you on how thoroughly you're earning it.
I'm curious what it is about your ilk that makes you abandon a conversation about the facts and evidence.....and flee desperately into ad hominem fallacies. While abandoning their every point.
You won't touch your blunder in claiming that Obama's mother was 17 when he was born (she was 18). You won't discuss the irrelevance of his mother's age to his citizenship, as he was born in Hawaii. You won't touch how no president has ever voluntarily released their college transcripts.
It apparently doesn't take much to make you abandon your every argument.
Actually her age was my mistake, not Cecilie's. Do try to keep up.
Which Cecile agreed with. So its her blunder too.
See how that works?
The only thing she agreed with was the dear leaders mother was not old enough to confer citizenship had she given birth outside the US, nothing more.
Not really relevant- since the whole issue is as moot as "Germany would have won the war if they had the nuclear bomb first"
BUT- if Ann Dunham's husband was still legally married to his Kenyan wife- then unbeknownst to Ann Dunham, their marriage would not have been legally valid in Hawaii, which would make her an unmarried mother- and then according to the law- she still would have conferred citizenship upon her son- if he was born in Ireland or Germany or on Mars
All of which is absolutely irrelevant- all of which has nothing to do with the claims about Cruz.
And yes- Cruz is eligible.