Q1 2019 watch - if under 3.0% - where is Trump’s economic miracle - can Trump beat O’s 2.9% ever?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Deeper recession should have a longer recovery?

Of course they should. The deeper the hole, the longer to climb out of it. But all recessions are different and all recoveries are different.

Obama's was different and weaker.

Than what?

Than every other post WWII recovery.

Stop lying. I already showed you GHW Bush's was weaker.

Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

 

[Faun]

Of course they should. The deeper the hole, the longer to climb out of it. But all recessions are different and all recoveries are different.

Obama's was different and weaker.

Than what?

Than every other post WWII recovery.

Stop lying. I already showed you GHW Bush's was weaker.

View attachment 269747


Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

View attachment 269748

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Obama's was different and weaker.

Than what?

Than every other post WWII recovery.

Stop lying. I already showed you GHW Bush's was weaker.

View attachment 269747


Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

View attachment 269748

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

 

[Faun]

Than what?

Than every other post WWII recovery.

Stop lying. I already showed you GHW Bush's was weaker.

View attachment 269747


Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

View attachment 269748

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Than every other post WWII recovery.

Stop lying. I already showed you GHW Bush's was weaker.

View attachment 269747


Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

View attachment 269748

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

 

[Faun]

Stop lying. I already showed you GHW Bush's was weaker.

View attachment 269747


Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

View attachment 269748

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

LOLOL

You're talking about something other than the recovery and conflating it with the recovery.

Bush41's recession had recovered by Q4-1991, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.2%.

Bush43's recession had recovered by Q3-2010, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.8%.

Any other quarters you're looking at are beyond the recovery.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

View attachment 269747


Real Gross Domestic Product | FRED | St. Louis Fed

View attachment 269748

Real Gross Domestic Product

Nah.

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

LOLOL

You're talking about something other than the recovery and conflating it with the recovery.

Bush41's recession had recovered by Q4-1991, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.2%.

Bush43's recession had recovered by Q3-2010, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.8%.

Any other quarters you're looking at are beyond the recovery.

Who said recovery is what you claim?
Which is what, precisely? From the trough to the first new peak....annualized?

 

[Faun]

LOL

Yeah, Obama's 2.8% real annualized GDP growth was better than Bush's 2.2%.

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

LOLOL

You're talking about something other than the recovery and conflating it with the recovery.

Bush41's recession had recovered by Q4-1991, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.2%.

Bush43's recession had recovered by Q3-2010, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.8%.

Any other quarters you're looking at are beyond the recovery.

Who said recovery is what you claim?
Which is what, precisely? From the trough to the first new peak....annualized?

Recovery is growing back to the level prior to the recession. Do you not know what the word, "recover," means?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Bush's 3.5% was better than Obama's 2.6%.

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

LOLOL

You're talking about something other than the recovery and conflating it with the recovery.

Bush41's recession had recovered by Q4-1991, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.2%.

Bush43's recession had recovered by Q3-2010, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.8%.

Any other quarters you're looking at are beyond the recovery.

Who said recovery is what you claim?
Which is what, precisely? From the trough to the first new peak....annualized?

Recovery is growing back to the level prior to the recession. Do you not know what the word, "recover," means?

When did Obama and Bush recover the previous employment peak?

 

[Faun]

GHW Bush's recovery was only 2.2%. Who knows where you imagine it was 3.5%?

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

LOLOL

You're talking about something other than the recovery and conflating it with the recovery.

Bush41's recession had recovered by Q4-1991, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.2%.

Bush43's recession had recovered by Q3-2010, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.8%.

Any other quarters you're looking at are beyond the recovery.

Who said recovery is what you claim?
Which is what, precisely? From the trough to the first new peak....annualized?

Recovery is growing back to the level prior to the recession. Do you not know what the word, "recover," means?

When did Obama and Bush recover the previous employment peak?

LOLOL

You were talking about GDP, remember?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% were both better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6%.

Bush's 3.5% and 2.8% and 4.0% were all better than Obama's 2.6% and 1.6% and 2.2%.

Wow, the longer you go, the weaker Obama's "recovery" looks.

LOLOL

You're talking about something other than the recovery and conflating it with the recovery.

Bush41's recession had recovered by Q4-1991, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.2%.

Bush43's recession had recovered by Q3-2010, at which point, real annualized GDP growth was 2.8%.

Any other quarters you're looking at are beyond the recovery.

Who said recovery is what you claim?
Which is what, precisely? From the trough to the first new peak....annualized?

Recovery is growing back to the level prior to the recession. Do you not know what the word, "recover," means?

When did Obama and Bush recover the previous employment peak?

LOLOL

You were talking about GDP, remember?

I remember. LOL!

 

[ph3iron]

only bring up the Fed rates as if Obama had nothing but advantages to get to a highest single

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22726225,

Lots of monetary help. He was handicapped by his economic idiocy and hate for business.​

The two goofy assed emotional factors you attribute to Obama certainly in your goofy mind were certainly not present when Bush 43 and his love for business was at work on the economy. Then we got 2.9 GDP in the negative direction and of course the worst recession since the Great Depression and the fastest rate of job losses ever.

Obama dealt with and fixed that just fine and you want sympathy and a excuses for TrumpO having lower than normal Fed rate with very close to full employment when he started his term.

You pathetic pitiful anti-thinking loser. TrumpO will be the second US president never to see a single year above 2.9 GDP in US history. And he had so many advantages but still could not beat Obama.

Wonder how my daughter started a $150MM business under Obama?
A few more brains than our don cult white boy?

What kind of business?

Electrical

 

[ph3iron]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22729461

Well, shit. He had 0% interest rates for 7 years and trillions in QE sloshing around.....
and his idiocy still resulted in weak economic growth. What a putz.

You are digging a hole because by TrumpO’s standard his idiocy has resulted in a weak economy as well.

Record deficits and debts though.
And fewer jobs than Obama
Just blab MAGA to the cult , that's all you need

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

only bring up the Fed rates as if Obama had nothing but advantages to get to a highest single

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22726225,

Lots of monetary help. He was handicapped by his economic idiocy and hate for business.​

The two goofy assed emotional factors you attribute to Obama certainly in your goofy mind were certainly not present when Bush 43 and his love for business was at work on the economy. Then we got 2.9 GDP in the negative direction and of course the worst recession since the Great Depression and the fastest rate of job losses ever.

Obama dealt with and fixed that just fine and you want sympathy and a excuses for TrumpO having lower than normal Fed rate with very close to full employment when he started his term.

You pathetic pitiful anti-thinking loser. TrumpO will be the second US president never to see a single year above 2.9 GDP in US history. And he had so many advantages but still could not beat Obama.

Wonder how my daughter started a $150MM business under Obama?
A few more brains than our don cult white boy?

What kind of business?

Electrical

Getting some of those awesome "green energy" tax credits?
Or does her business actually generate useful amounts of reliable energy?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22729461

Well, shit. He had 0% interest rates for 7 years and trillions in QE sloshing around.....
and his idiocy still resulted in weak economic growth. What a putz.

You are digging a hole because by TrumpO’s standard his idiocy has resulted in a weak economy as well.

Record deficits and debts though.
And fewer jobs than Obama
Just blab MAGA to the cult , that's all you need

Record deficits and debts though.

Obama had higher deficits.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22736460

Obama had higher deficits

TrumpO is not a recovery President. Why do you feel the need to compare TrumpO’s failings in a good economy to Obama’s achievements in the wake of the worst economy since the Great Depression.?

 

[Faun]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22729461

Well, shit. He had 0% interest rates for 7 years and trillions in QE sloshing around.....
and his idiocy still resulted in weak economic growth. What a putz.

You are digging a hole because by TrumpO’s standard his idiocy has resulted in a weak economy as well.

Record deficits and debts though.
And fewer jobs than Obama
Just blab MAGA to the cult , that's all you need

Record deficits and debts though.

Obama had higher deficits.

Obama was handed the worst economy in our lifetime.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22736460

Obama had higher deficits

TrumpO is not a recovery President. Why do you feel the need to compare TrumpO’s failings in a good economy to Obama’s achievements in the wake of the worst economy since the Great Depression.?

TrumpO is not a recovery President.

Who said he was? Link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22729461

Well, shit. He had 0% interest rates for 7 years and trillions in QE sloshing around.....
and his idiocy still resulted in weak economic growth. What a putz.

You are digging a hole because by TrumpO’s standard his idiocy has resulted in a weak economy as well.

Record deficits and debts though.
And fewer jobs than Obama
Just blab MAGA to the cult , that's all you need

Record deficits and debts though.

Obama had higher deficits.

Obama was handed the worst economy in our lifetime.

Poor Obama......smartest President in history, not responsible for anything.

How did he do on "slowing the rise of the oceans"?

 

[Faun]

Toddsterpatriot, post: 22729461

Well, shit. He had 0% interest rates for 7 years and trillions in QE sloshing around.....
and his idiocy still resulted in weak economic growth. What a putz.

You are digging a hole because by TrumpO’s standard his idiocy has resulted in a weak economy as well.

Record deficits and debts though.
And fewer jobs than Obama
Just blab MAGA to the cult , that's all you need

Record deficits and debts though.

Obama had higher deficits.

Obama was handed the worst economy in our lifetime.

Poor Obama......smartest President in history, not responsible for anything.

How did he do on "slowing the rise of the oceans"?

LOL

He's certainly not responsible for the economy in the failed condition it was in when he started.

Your next whine is ... ?