Pyramids are impossible: Grok AI

[Crepitus]

If true, Grok AI just says what every human in his right mind would also conclude: Pyramids are way too complex for ancient Egyptians to build. It also says they are way older than they tell us. It says thousands of years of constant rain are required to cause the erosion. And there was no rain for thousands of years there, except for some exceptions.

Elmo's little pet is remarkably stupid and inept.

 

[MarathonMike]

Indeed. Pile of rocks tech. Very sophisticated.

Wow, really?

 

[Bleipriester]

whoever posed the question to Grok must have posed the question to Grok (intentionally or not) in a manner that made it clear to the AI that the person asking the question is a fan of such conspiracy theories.

As I said earlier, Grok is notorious for "reading" people and telling them what they want to hear.

That's why people like poor Mort get so addicted to AI

The video reveals how the AI was instructed.

 

[lg325]

The answer maybe in the Library of Alexandria which was sunk into the sea all those centuries ago.
The worldwide ancient civilization would go along with scripture mention of the Tower of Babel.

 

[Bleipriester]

There are MANY ancient structures, walls and buildings all over the world that defy explanation.

Sure, but that video is new.

 

[Kruska]

So you've seen multiple videos of unexplainable ancient structures and you understand how they were made? Let's hear it!

So far - "real" scientists and "real" archeologists - have always come up with proven practical explanations and tools.
Since e.g. wars find billions in funding's - profound archeology simply remains a poor orphan and therefore takes time.

 

[Kruska]

It could be according to Grok:

• Egyptians were more advanced than we thought

That's exactly what serious archeologists are proving all the time - without Grok AI.

 

[braalian]

It could be according to Grok:

• Egyptians were more advanced than we thought
• An ancient civilization built them
• Another earth based non-human race built them
• Aliens built them

if that were a multiple choice question, the obvious anwer is 'A'

 

[braalian]

The video reveals how the AI was instructed.

not to beat a dead horse, but simply asking Grok what "other" possible origins there may be for the pyramids likely 100% tipped it off about what the person asking is interested in and wants to hear.

 

[MarathonMike]

So far - "real" scientists and "real" archeologists - have always come up with proven practical explanations and tools.
Since e.g. wars find billions in funding's - profound archeology simply remains a poor orphan and therefore takes time.

Incorrect. There are many ancient structures that cannot be explained given the age of the structures and the tools that would have been available at the time. Some have been explained, many have not.

 

[Kruska]

Incorrect. There are many ancient structures that cannot be explained given the age of the structures and the tools that would have been available at the time. Some have been explained, many have not.

So far - "real" scientists and "real" archeologists - have always come up with proven practical explanations and tools.
Since e.g. wars find billions in funding's - profound archeology simply remains a poor orphan and therefore takes time.

There are simply not enough financial resources and profound archeologists to come up with all answer by tomorrow.

So which ancient structure gives you sleepless nights, or you have in mind - that supposedly can't be explained?

 

[Muhammed]

whoever posed the question to Grok must have posed the question to Grok (intentionally or not) in a manner that made it clear to the AI that the person asking the question is a fan of such conspiracy theories.

As I said earlier, Grok is notorious for "reading" people and telling them what they want to hear.

That's why people like poor Mort get so addicted to AI

They simply lie to Grok. Garbage in, Garbage out.

 

[Muhammed]

Incorrect. There are many ancient structures that cannot be explained given the age of the structures and the tools that would have been available at the time. Some have been explained, many have not.

You haven't done much stone masonry, have you?

 

[Muhammed]

Wow, really?

Yes. They made clever use of gravity. They used it to hold the top rock down on top of the bottom rock so that they actually touched each other and stayed there instead of the top rock just floating away.

And this was centuries before Newton discovered gravity.

Super high tech shit.