Putin Responds

And those go back to supersonic on terminal approach.
Who told you this?

I've seen nothing released on exact speeds on terminal approach of weapons like HAWC or LHRW, all they released on the HAWC tests was that it exceeded mach 5 in flight.
 
Who told you this?

I've seen nothing released on exact speeds on terminal approach of weapons like HAWC or LHRW, all they released on the HAWC tests was that it exceeded mach 5 in flight.

The problem with going hypersonic at terminal phase is any adjustment you may make would be countered by the time to impact being so short you may shoot over your target.
 
Answer Putin, or Zelensky (or both)?

Remained in power past his term?
Canceled elections?
Outlawed opposition parties?
Took state control of the media?
Employed neo-Nazis in his government?
Criminalized speech?

I know you're too cowardly to answer honestly, but I already know the answers.
IMG_4161.webp
 


Putin knows Trump is not running the war and has no control over Ukraine

Ukraine lost 285k since January and 1.7M overall

New flash point Iran Azerbaijan
 
It is funny how MAGAs claim Democrats have been weak toward Putin. Yet Biden and the Democrats and some right-minded Republicans gave a lot of military aid to Ukraine to repel Putin's criminal invasion.

Both offensive and defensive weapons.

Trump announced a couple days ago he was only going to give Ukraine defensive weapons. Trump obviously does not want Ukraine to be able to take back the land Putin has stolen.

Trump's idea of ending the war (in 24 hours :lol: ) is identical to Putin's idea of ending the war. That is, to let Putin keep what he took.

Defensive weapons cannot counter Putin's onslaught in response to Trump's weakness:

Russia attacks Ukraine with 700 drones after Trump vows to send more weapons



700 drones. That's a world record.

Actually, it was 728 drones. And some hypersonic missiles.




As the old saying goes, "The best defense is a good offense."

Trump needs to up his game to at least the level Biden was at.
Warmongers are cute.
 
The problem with going hypersonic at terminal phase is any adjustment you may make would be countered by the time to impact being so short you may shoot over your target.
Obviously you'd be constrained by physics on how sharply you could maneuver at a given speed over a given distance, but I don't think we have enough information to state that all hypersonic weapons must go below a certain speed on terminal.

SM-3 is flies at over mach 8 and it is maneuvering a hit-to-kill vehicle to strike a moving target. Zircon supposedly hits mach 8+, at that speed it is reaching its target in less than 5 minutes so I'm fairly skeptical it is going to slow down under mach 5. This first generation of hypersonics are all designed to hit fixed coordinates, there is no reason they need to reduce speed below mach 5 unless you know classified details on their turn rates and how far from the target they stop maneuvering.

Either way, do you have any real sources that hypersonic vehicles slow down that much on terminal or were you just making assumptions?
 
Dumbass, how do you imagine laundering of Abrams tanks, ATACMS or Patriot missiles happens?
It's about idiots like you they say "Can't neither to steal, nor to guard"(Ни украсть, ни посторожить). So you wouldn't be taken into Ukrainian corrupt officials. Your job is to bark on the internet.
 
It's about idiots like you they say "Can't neither to steal, nor to guard"(Ни украсть, ни посторожить). So you wouldn't be taken into Ukrainian corrupt officials. Your job is to bark on the internet.
??? Does anyone understand what this senile fool is saying or why?
 
Remember when the US bombed Japan at the end of the war to scare Stalin? Who will they bomb to scare Putin?
 


Dummy, if thats all he wanted then Trump would long ago give it to him.

There has not been American heavy weapons in Ukraine until Putin's full scale invasion in 2022 and there is exactly ZERO indication Putin would stop the war if only America would agree to not arm Ukraine.
 
Back
Top Bottom