OK Geoduck - Try not to get you knickers in such a knot.
It's just words on a screen and not worth your angst. Note also that I'm not a mindreader so what you and your mind's ear think you said may not always convey as such on the screen that the rest of us are reading.
Although you claim you're not mind reader, you can't suppress your "readings" toward my education that you're obsessed with. Sorry to disappoint you, but I have probably spent in schools and universities more time and money than you and your sons together.
As for "broken treaties", classic example might be that of Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia carving up Poland between them in Sept. 1939. They had a "Mutual Non-Aggression Pact (Treaty)" between them at that time. Barely two years later Nazi Germany 'broke' that treaty by attacking and invading the USSR/Soviet Russia. History is filled with such similar examples and such is what I was inferring to.
Irrelevant to our discussion, since both countries Germany and USSR were dictatorships with their own ambitions of world dominance. Just in that case, both sides were planning to attack each other, Hitler because of oil, and Stalin because of World Comintern beliefs. It just happened that Hitler did it first and caught Stalin by surprise.
However, you still haven't answered the question I asked you initially: "Do you think Mexico would be better off if they break the treaty they have with us?"
This is something I was implying you should have learned in course of your K-12 education, if not also in any college you may have attended.
If you had facts, and you don't, you wouldn't be implying, mind reading, and assuming. None of those are in touch with reality, except in your own mind, perhaps..
As a single parent I raised my two sons through public education in the 1990s and noticed the decline in just a few decade from my time in the 1960s regards extend and depth of World History~USA History~Civics in general, Etc.
As a grandparent I notice the further decline in education quality in this area ever since via monitoring the knowledge/education of my grandchildren.
The USA and Mexico have a long history together and all I asked for as a more specific example of what you were inferring.
There were only two defense treaties we had with Mexico, and from one of them Mexico stepped out some 20 years ago. Now pick the treaty that you want to discuss.
Note also that if one clicks on your name, then goes to your Profile here, and then clicks on the "About"; all we get is you claim to be a male and live in Michigan. We don't get anything on if you are a citizen or not, what your age might be, nor especially on your background, experience, etc. This sparsity of revelation is often common to Leftists and I'd be inclined to suspect you as such based on that secrecy.
"We don't get anything"... And it drives you nutz.
I don't give a shit about what you want. What would change in my posts, or in yours, even if you know more about me? There is no secrecy, and in 13 years on this board some earned to get to know me better. Are you offended you're not one of them? The amount of Information "about" me is about the same as most of posters here. You wanna know more, either read my posts, or earn it.
As for myself, if anyone were to check my track of posts you'd see that I could be considered on the Right Side of Political Spectrum, at the least. Click onto my 'Profile' and 'About' and you find more information on me than you have willingness to provide on yourself (what might that say about your integrity and honesty?). For the most part you remain an unknown vague username to myself and others. Put that in your bong and toke it.
BTW, my usual way to cook tilapia is with a splash or two of either lemon or lime juice and a sprinkling of ground dill weed.
Again, I don't care what you put in your profile. It's completely irrelevant to have the conversation. As you being on "right side of political spectrum", you can claim anything. I haven't read enough of your posts to make my own conclusion. So far I learned that you have a sharp tongue. But sharp tongue is no indication of a keen mind.
