1srelluc
Diamond Member
Simply put some things are not worth "protecting". Propping up something like faggotry is one of them and I've lived on this rock long enough to tell the difference.“Claiming that suppressing people’s rights is ‘for the health of the species’ is the exact kind of justification used by tyrants throughout history—from eugenics programs to ethnic cleansing. It’s not new, it’s not noble, and it’s not freedom. It’s tyranny dressed up in pseudo-scientific moralizing.
Freedom means tolerating views, identities, and lifestyles you don’t personally agree with. The First Amendment exists not to protect the majority—but to protect the minority from the majority’s abuse. That’s what separates a republic from mob rule.
Using slurs and calling people a ‘lower order of human’ isn’t just morally bankrupt—it’s dangerous. That’s how genocides start. Not by guns or bombs, but by dehumanizing words that soften people up to look the other way when rights are taken or lives are destroyed.
You don’t have to like someone’s religion or orientation. You do have to respect their rights as equal citizens. Because if their rights can be taken today, yours can be taken tomorrow.
Freedom isn’t about control. It’s about restraint—especially when you don’t like someone. That’s what makes it hard. That’s also what makes it worth protecting.
Freedom is not being coerced into allowing such things.
