Putin At The Siege Of Leningrad Commemoration Which Was 81 Years Ago.

Stalin was a brutal dictator but it's a stretch to claim that he intentionally starved the Russian people at Leningrad. The Germans had the city surrounded and the Russian army was on the defensive. The Germans weren't prepared for the brutal Russian winter and that's what broke the siege.
Leningrad was never surrounded. Yes, land access was blocked, but the water and, in winter, over ice access was never blocked, or even effectively interdicted by the Germans. Stalin refused to allow the civilians to evacuate in the boats and trucks that bought munitions into the city for the Red Army. He wanted the labor pool available to build/repair defenses, so hundreds of thousands starved to death.
 

Leningrad was never surrounded. Yes, land access was blocked, but the water and, in winter, over ice access was never blocked, or even effectively interdicted by the Germans. Stalin refused to allow the civilians to evacuate in the boats and trucks that bought munitions into the city for the Red Army. He wanted the labor pool available to build/repair defenses, so hundreds of thousands starved to death.
you know the drill 👍 . + by air

we did it 2 times, Moscow empire tried 2 starve to death W Berlin, and badly failed 2 times


 
you know the drill 👍 . + by air

we did it 2 times, Moscow empire tried 2 starve to death W Berlin, and badly failed 2 times


The Red Airforce didn't have even the airlift capacity of the Luftwaffe which couldn't keep Stalingrad supplied by air.
 
The Red Airforce didn't have even the airlift capacity of the Luftwaffe which couldn't keep Stalingrad supplied by air.
🇷🇺 football match dedicated to the victims of siege-of-leningrad


Screenshot_2025-01-30-19-01-39-989_org.telegram.messenger.webp
 
Zhukov said we liberated Europe and they will never forgive us for it, how right he was.
 

YOUR fav. Grishka Catafalque also , that "... it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel without which we could not have formed our reserves or continued the war. The Americans provided vital explosives and gunpowder. And how much steel! Could we really have set up the production of our tanks without American steel? And now they are saying that we had plenty of everything on our own."

do you agree with Grishka Catafalque ?



1738286353085.png
 

YOUR fav. Grishka Catafalque also , that "... it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel without which we could not have formed our reserves or continued the war. The Americans provided vital explosives and gunpowder. And how much steel! Could we really have set up the production of our tanks without American steel? And now they are saying that we had plenty of everything on our own."

do you agree with Grishka Catafalque ?



View attachment 1072724
Well you never forgave the Soviets for liberating Europe.
 
The Red Airforce didn't have even the airlift capacity of the Luftwaffe which couldn't keep Stalingrad supplied by air.
Well the Nazis couldn't keep their troops supplied at Stalingrad that's why many froze to death and the ones who were not dead were taken prisoner including Paulus.
 
Stalin was a brutal dictator but it's a stretch to claim that he intentionally starved the Russian people at Leningrad. The Germans had the city surrounded and the Russian army was on the defensive. The Germans weren't prepared for the brutal Russian winter and that's what broke the siege.
Titwin is deranged so take that into account.
 
Well you never forgave the Soviets for liberating Europe.
Have (your) Bolshevik (the worst slave-drivers out there ) imperialists liberated Europe ? are you drunk ? by the way, was Zhukov a looter (according Bolshevik law) ?





American GULAG slaves were also " liberated " ?
 
Well you never forgave the Soviets for liberating Europe.
The Soviets didn't "liberate" Europe, they conquered it just like the Nazi Germans did. If they had "liberated" it, they would have done what the WAllies did in France, Denmark, Norway, Belgium and Holland. Pulled out at the end of the war and let the citizens create their own government. Instead, the Soviets imposed a government in every country they captured of communists made up of communists approved by Stalin. The only country to avoid that fate was Yugoslavia, which was ruled by Marshal Tito, a home-grown communist who was cool towards Stalin since most of his aid during the war came from the WAllies, NOT the USSR.
 
The Soviets didn't "liberate" Europe, they conquered it just like the Nazi Germans did. If they had "liberated" it, they would have done what the WAllies did in France, Denmark, Norway, Belgium and Holland. Pulled out at the end of the war and let the citizens create their own government. Instead, the Soviets imposed a government in every country they captured of communists made up of communists approved by Stalin. The only country to avoid that fate was Yugoslavia, which was ruled by Marshal Tito, a home-grown communist who was cool towards Stalin since most of his aid during the war came from the WAllies, NOT the USSR.
So let me run this past you, tell the survivors of the death camps in Eastern Europe the red army many of who were Ukrainian didn't liberate them, also if the Soviet Union had lost the war what the hell do you think Europe would look like? there would't be a Jew left alive they would have all been murdered.
 
Last edited:
So what are you saying Russia shouldn't commemorate their fallen and military for defeating Hitler? there are also plenty of Nazi apologist cocksuckers on this forum and they are lower than vermin.

Clearly that's not what he said.
 
So let me run this past you, tell the survivors of the death camps in Eastern Europe the red army many of who were Ukrainian didn't liberate them, also if the Soviet Union had lost the war what the hell do you think Europe would look like? there would't be a Jew left alive they would have all been murdered.

Europe would look far better than it does today. If Germany had defeated the USSR, the effort would have weakened Germany so badly that the WAllied invasion of France would have been a walkover. Allied air power would still have exterminated the Luftwaffe, WAllied air power would still have isolated Western Europe from supplies so the occupation forces would still have been low on food and munitions. The WAllies would still have had massive numerical superiority in men and weapons. Once the USA entered the war, Germany and Japan had zero chance of victory. The only question was how much the victory would cost in treasure and blood. In the face of WAllied aerial supremacy Germany couldn't support the occupation forces it had in France and the Low Countries let alone a larger one. Even without the use of nukes, Germany was doomed to defeat, with them it was doomed to defeat and destruction. The border with the USSR would be wherever the Germans decided to set it, probably the Urals making the USSR a minor, powerless state that could barely feed itself.
 
Europe would look far better than it does today. If Germany had defeated the USSR, the effort would have weakened Germany so badly that the WAllied invasion of France would have been a walkover. Allied air power would still have exterminated the Luftwaffe, WAllied air power would still have isolated Western Europe from supplies so the occupation forces would still have been low on food and munitions. The WAllies would still have had massive numerical superiority in men and weapons. Once the USA entered the war, Germany and Japan had zero chance of victory. The only question was how much the victory would cost in treasure and blood. In the face of WAllied aerial supremacy Germany couldn't support the occupation forces it had in France and the Low Countries let alone a larger one. Even without the use of nukes, Germany was doomed to defeat, with them it was doomed to defeat and destruction. The border with the USSR would be wherever the Germans decided to set it, probably the Urals making the USSR a minor, powerless state that could barely feed itself.
so here we have it, you are just sorry the Nazis lost, like i said there would't be a Jew in Europe today no matter how you spin it, the Soviets destroyed 85% of axis forces, it must really piss you off.
 
so here we have it, you are just sorry the Nazis lost, like i said there would't be a Jew in Europe today no matter how you spin it, the Soviets destroyed 85% of axis forces, it must really piss you off.
God, you are both stupid and ignorant. What ever gave you the idea I am pro-Nazi? As far as I'm concerned, both the Nazis and Communists were evil and both deserve to be destroyed.
 
So let me run this past you, tell the survivors of the death camps in Eastern Europe the red army many of who were Ukrainian didn't liberate them, also if the Soviet Union had lost the war what the hell do you think Europe would look like? there would't be a Jew left alive they would have all been murdered.

George (grishka) 🇷🇺 Galloway (and a member of Kremlin VIP 🇷🇺 pedo club) much like you, a Moscow ´s snitch
FNvXEIIXEAU0kFi



 
God, you are both stupid and ignorant. What ever gave you the idea I am pro-Nazi? As far as I'm concerned, both the Nazis and Communists were evil and both deserve to be destroyed.
ITS AN OLD Moscow popoganda tool, 🇷🇺they call all who are against Moscow empire for "Nazis" , Jews, Finns, commie Tito , etc.



how-do-you-evaluate-the-websites-rumors-about-comrade-tito-v0-hkatk48i7ytc1.png
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom