No dummy, they are still illegals, obama gave the temporary amnesty from deportation, go back and do your homework before spouting incoherent mush
.
No dummy, they are still illegals, obama gave the temporary amnesty from deportation, go back and do your homework before spouting incoherent mush
.
As soon as Obama loses his job, their amnesty will disappear.
That's not so.
The thinking is that there are already laws in place for equality.
Women have to earn their way just like men do, and passing a law to sidestep competence makes for a very bad law that will not pass muster before the Supreme Court.
To make a long story short, I hear there's a sale on crow and you'll be eating some if you keep passing laws the Supreme Court shows are unconstitutional.
Get a life, Mr. Luddly.
I agree...
Ok, I guess I will take the lead then.... B )
Well sadly they don't in many cases, where as right now there is a situation where I know of a woman who is doing a job at a corporate grocery store chain as a (book keeper), yet she is being under paid badly at this position in which she holds right now to this day, and she has been at this job for over ten years now altogether. She started as a part time cashier just helping out at night, while she did her full time job as book keeper for a large company prior to the failed economy back in 08 (held down both jobs). She then had to turn to this part time job, in order for it to then become her full time employer after being laid off from the old full time job in 08. Sadly what has also since been realized, is that this chain never hires a woman to be a manager of any of it's stores (only men). There is definitely discrimination present at this chain against women, but no one has reported it yet or even thinks that they could report it, in that it would even mean anything if they did. I really feel bad for situations like this, but it's out there people, and don't ever think that it isn't when it is.
IF she's being discriminated against - and that's a big IF - and she's not taking advantage of the anti-discrimination laws already in place, what makes you think she'd take advantage of a new law if one was passed? Seems to me if she just lies down and accepts it, it becomes HER fault that she's being treated badly.
That's not so.
The thinking is that there are already laws in place for equality.
Women have to earn their way just like men do, and passing a law to sidestep competence makes for a very bad law that will not pass muster before the Supreme Court.
To make a long story short, I hear there's a sale on crow and you'll be eating some if you keep passing laws the Supreme Court shows are unconstitutional.
Get a life, Mr. Luddly.
Yep, oftentimes it's enforcement, not legislative:
Paycheck Fairness Act Fails Senate Vote
Hmmmm, so all one has to do is report this to the right people eh, and something could be done about it pronto is what yop are saying, and this would be in reagards to all women who are being abused in this respect, or is it that the current law is weak and doesn't go far enough on this issue ? Undoubtedly the current law is not effective enough (abuse still running rampant in the nation under such laws), or why would people be pushing for a stronger law that to suceed the current one ?
Well sadly they don't in many cases, where as right now there is a situation where I know of a woman who is doing a job at a corporate grocery store chain as a (book keeper), yet she is being under paid badly at this position in which she holds right now to this day, and she has been at this job for over ten years now altogether. She started as a part time cashier just helping out at night, while she did her full time job as book keeper for a large company prior to the failed economy back in 08 (held down both jobs). She then had to turn to this part time job, in order for it to then become her full time employer after being laid off from the old full time job in 08. Sadly what has also since been realized, is that this chain never hires a woman to be a manager of any of it's stores (only men). There is definitely discrimination present at this chain against women, but no one has reported it yet or even thinks that they could report it, in that it would even mean anything if they did. I really feel bad for situations like this, but it's out there people, and don't ever think that it isn't when it is.
Well that, as you well know, is against the law. Passing another law won't help that woman if the company isn't obeying the current laws and no one is reporting it.
Hmmmm or is it that it just depends on which administration is elected in or who is in charge, that determins the extensiveness or application of enforcement of the laws, and which one will not enforce the laws when in power as they should be enforced always as law that to be enforced when abuse is known or present under such laws ? Now this is the million dollar question in my honest opinion to be answered next, and answered correctly when answered.
Who enforces law better when in office, the democrats or the republicans ?
A history of this should be generated and published, in order to show the stark differences wouldn't you think ?
No dummy, they are still illegals, obama gave the temporary amnesty from deportation, go back and do your homework before spouting incoherent mush
.
so you are such a retard that you do not know what illegal and amnesty means
