Public school children forced to pray to Allah

[Ravi]

Everyone who read the thread knows that is exactly how you feel about the President's children.

You are such a turd as a human being.

Actually I read it and to me it was clear he was playing you all and playing a part.

His attempt at playing people doesn't change the fact that he wrote porn about elementary children. Normal people don't do things like that...interesting that you all applaud it.

 

[JenT]

Does she, or was that edit in as well? My guess is that it was edited in.

If a mother was that upset she wouldn't sit there calmly filming what was going on around her.

Somethings happen to fast to react and it doesn't sound like an edit to me. The actress "voice" states that she was waiting for the teachers to do something. I am guessing no one was willing to intrude on the prayer regardless of what was happening. I am not sure what sex her child was, it could be that her child was a girl..and not part of the prayer...which is why she didn't intervene...as it was not her child.

She, the actress, said she was looking around...if she had been the camera would have been jittering around as well. And the mic wouldn't have picked up her one whispered phrase...this is just pure stupidity and hysteria.

The entire video is bullshit. Some kids inadvertently were allowed to pray, not FORCED to pray...the principal apologized. End of story. Well, except some rightwingloons got a hold of the tape and edited it and hired someone to do a voice over...hmmm, what's Britelbart up to these days?

They don't need to edit it. It's already established by the 9th circuit and US Supreme Court that teachers can require kids to pray to Allah. PDF of the case with Judge Phyllis Hamilton presiding is already on line.

 

[Ravi]

I cannot believe all the Libs on here that refuse to admit that the school was wrong. Even after the letter admitting they were wrong was sent out.

It just goes to show what their intelligence level is and where their loyalties truly lie....



Actually I do believe it. I almost have come to expect it.

I think it shows your lack of reading comprehension.

 

[JenT]

If she was looking around, it would be reflected in the video. There is no change of picture, no dip, no shake, nothing. Not my fault you are so credible you believe everything spoon fed to you by rightwingloons. Try critical thinking once in a while...oh, whoops...you can't.

thank you for calling me credible, that however is neither here nor there. The fact is that you are wrong about the camera.

Oh and as for your usual stupidity about me being a rightwing loon. Odd that I find myself at odds with as many right wing positions on this board as left wing positions yet you choose to attempt to identify me as a right wing loon.

Just more stupidity from Ravi, the queen of stupidity.

Don't feel bad, in one thread, I went from being a libturd to being a fascist without ever changing threads...

 

[Ravi]

Somethings happen to fast to react and it doesn't sound like an edit to me. The actress "voice" states that she was waiting for the teachers to do something. I am guessing no one was willing to intrude on the prayer regardless of what was happening. I am not sure what sex her child was, it could be that her child was a girl..and not part of the prayer...which is why she didn't intervene...as it was not her child.

She, the actress, said she was looking around...if she had been the camera would have been jittering around as well. And the mic wouldn't have picked up her one whispered phrase...this is just pure stupidity and hysteria.

The entire video is bullshit. Some kids inadvertently were allowed to pray, not FORCED to pray...the principal apologized. End of story. Well, except some rightwingloons got a hold of the tape and edited it and hired someone to do a voice over...hmmm, what's Britelbart up to these days?

They don't need to edit it. It's already established by the 9th circuit and US Supreme Court that teachers can require kids to pray to Allah. PDF of the case with Judge Phyllis Hamilton presiding is already on line.

What would we do without your big lie?

 

[Micky G. Jagger]

Let's hear the outrage from the liberals.

American Thinker Blog: Public school children forced to pray to Allah

I don't see what the problem is. There's no separation of church and state in the Constitution. The government can exercise authority over religion anyway it wants to.

 

[SFC Ollie]

I cannot believe all the Libs on here that refuse to admit that the school was wrong. Even after the letter admitting they were wrong was sent out.

It just goes to show what their intelligence level is and where their loyalties truly lie....



Actually I do believe it. I almost have come to expect it.

I think it shows your lack of reading comprehension.

Are you talking to yourself? There is help for that.

 

[jillian]

She, the actress, said she was looking around...if she had been the camera would have been jittering around as well. And the mic wouldn't have picked up her one whispered phrase...this is just pure stupidity and hysteria.

The entire video is bullshit. Some kids inadvertently were allowed to pray, not FORCED to pray...the principal apologized. End of story. Well, except some rightwingloons got a hold of the tape and edited it and hired someone to do a voice over...hmmm, what's Britelbart up to these days?

They don't need to edit it. It's already established by the 9th circuit and US Supreme Court that teachers can require kids to pray to Allah. PDF of the case with Judge Phyllis Hamilton presiding is already on line.

What would we do without your big lie?

pathologic, isn't it?

 

[daveman]

I'm sorry; at what point are they identified as the brides? Even Worldnetdaily felt obliged to print a reluctant retraction of that claim:

Hamas denies holding mass kiddie marriage

Good to know that you'll believe anything as long as it can be used to portray Islam negatively.


I never claimed that this wasn't an issue; I specifically and correctly pointed out that the Hamas-sponsored mass wedding did not include "child brides." You probably shouldn't lie about what I said when my posts are right here.

Given that there is so much undeniably wrong with Islam, why do you even bother trying to whitewash it? Do you think your feeble "Nuh-UH!!"s will sway anyone with eyes and ears?

Shit-flinging on your part is not tantamount to whitewashing on mine. Please explain how disproving your claim is a "feeble" argument.

You disproved one claim. Are you now claiming you disproved them all?

 

[Ravi]

They don't need to edit it. It's already established by the 9th circuit and US Supreme Court that teachers can require kids to pray to Allah. PDF of the case with Judge Phyllis Hamilton presiding is already on line.

What would we do without your big lie?

pathologic, isn't it?

She must have lost her mind when Chelsea married a Jewish man.

 

[daveman]

Then you'll be pleased to hear that I don't.

But you refuse to condemn those of your brothers who do.

Don't bother trying now. It wouldn't be sincere.

Kalam obviously isn't familiar with Edmund Burke or the term 'tacit approval'.

It's slime.

Indeed.

 

[daveman]

You're missing the point. Permission slip is not the issue. The school said one thing and then did something different. There was no mention of indoctrination or prayer. That's why the school apologized. You don't apologize unless you did something wrong.

You have a misperception. The school is not the boss. The parents are. That may be hard to comprehend for a statist like you.

You have two misperceptions you need to clear up.

One, the school is in charge. If you don't like it, then you remove your child.

Two, I think what you are calling "indoctrination or prayer" was cultural exchange, and I believe someone among the parents or opponents or the program are lying.

The school took the easy way out, and that was wrong. The principal and superintendent should have called an open meeting with the media there with the families and explained exactly what happened.

That is how life in public is handled. You, Jack Fate, are not an island to yourself.

The school is in charge of the teachers, not the children or the parents. You need to learn and understand that. That's why they apologized. You obviously do not understand America. Where do you live?

Jack, one thing you need to know about Jake (if you haven't already figured it out) is it's utterly impossible for him to criticize Democrats, the left, or any liberal special interest groups.

 

[CaféAuLait]

Let's hear the outrage from the liberals.

American Thinker Blog: Public school children forced to pray to Allah

I have not read the etire thread so forgive me if this has been mentioned I can’t even imagine if this was a video of Muslim children taken to a Catholic Church, what if they were told to Pray to Jesus and reenact communion or something? I can’t imagine. I’m sure there would be terrorist threats against the school, the Church they were taken to, the teachers, the state, heck all of America would probably be on a heightened terror watch!

 

[daveman]

Nope, TJ and JF, the world does not operate the way you want. You are the ones in the hole, and you are getting buried by both (1) the logic people are piling on you, and (2) your silliness of the OP.

The board and superintendent are in charge of everything that has to do with the school, period. Come on grounds with an attitude or act that way in a school meeting, and you will leave in handcuffs.

If you don't like it, withdraw your children as students.

That is as far as your independent rights go.

Truly spoken like someone who surrenders his entire life to Government.

Pathetic.

 

[Againsheila]

Given that there is so much undeniably wrong with Islam, why do you even bother trying to whitewash it? Do you think your feeble "Nuh-UH!!"s will sway anyone with eyes and ears?

Shit-flinging on your part is not tantamount to whitewashing on mine. Please explain how disproving your claim is a "feeble" argument.

You disproved one claim. Are you now claiming you disproved them all?

I don't even think he disproved the one....I looked all over and the little girls in bridal gowns are the only girls shown. Where are these brides age 16 and over????

 

[daveman]

No, TJ, you are lying. That is not what happened. Tell the truth, please.

Still haven't watched the video, huh?

Dumbass.

 

[mal]

sure. why would it matter? orthodox jews do the same thing, IIRC.

do you think it would scar them for life?

You're fucked up.

Personally , I want my daughter to grow up knowing that she is not a second class citizen, and she doesn't have to take a back seat to anyone. Including Muslim men.

it doesn't surprise me that your offspring wouldn't be strong enough nor intelligent enough to withstand the *horrors* of a mosque visit.

the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, after all.

Classy!... Goin' after the Kids!... Nice work, del!



peace...

 

[daveman]

Men and women in congregations pray on different sides of the mosque or with women behind men. Having men behind women during sujud would be awkward, to say the least.

Now if they were in mini skirts i would agree with you. Unless you are saying all the men are perves and cant control themselves, peeking up womens asses. You know not keeping their mind on god but the ass in front of them. Then again what if the men are gay? That could be an issue.

When your face is inches away from a woman who is in that position, God is probably not going to be the first thing on your mind regardless of whether she's wearing a skirt or not. This isn't unreasonable and you know it.

Don't forget, ladies and gentlemen: Islam insists women be covered because men are incapable of controlling themselves. The sight of a lock of hair or an ankle is enough to inspire rape. And they've built in enough caveats so that men are rarely convicted of rape...but their female victims are killed brutally for it -- sometimes by their own family.

Now Kalam will say "Nuh-UH!!'

 

[Charles_Main]

No, TJ, you are lying. That is not what happened. Tell the truth, please.

Still haven't watched the video, huh?

Dumbass.

He does not have to. All the opinions in his one sided liberal mind were put there long ago by others.

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are reactionary, eaglebeck, not a traditional conservative. You are mistaking your uber-patriotic position as classical conservatism. You are dead wrong.