Psychosis: Calling The First Witness

[Soupnazi630]

That is even sillier.
Marx caused no evil at all, and in fact only wrote theoretically back around 1830.

Wrong.

he wrote massively ignorant and stupid crap whcih has been followed and practicied by the most evil and blood thirsty governments in history.

His theories include demands for slavery and dictatorship he was a mosnter. That is fact you are wrong and ignorant of the pig

 

[Soupnazi630]

That is silly.
Karl Marx was a humanitarian and simply recognized the danger of mass production to the previous era of cottage industries.
The fact workers could use collective bargaining techniques to prevent capitalist abuses, never occurred to Marx.
Problem solved.
But Marx was not at all authoritarian, and is on record being against a strong state, and wanted the state to "whither away and die".

Karl marx was a grifter and fool who openly HATED humanity and wanted to desgtroy ALL social constructs.

He recognized no such thing and every one of his economic ideas have been disproven.

He is on record demanding dictatorship and despotism

 

[PoliticalChic]

Totally wrong.
Germany is incredibly independent and anti-authoritarian.
That is why they remained a bunch of small city states until around 1840 or so, when Germany was united into a single country.
And even that would not have happened except that the competition from France and England made it necessary.
Germany was always liberal and progressive, but was the single most decentralized country in Europe.
Much more decentralized than the US even.
The fact the Germans believe in self discipline, does NOT mean they approve of anything authoritarian.
Hitler was the first time Germans allowed authoritarian rule and that was due to the extreme evil the Allies forced on Germany with the corrupt Treaty of Versailles.

Amazing consistency.

You have never been known to be correct.


The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is silly.
Karl Marx was a humanitarian and simply recognized the danger of mass production to the previous era of cottage industries.
The fact workers could use collective bargaining techniques to prevent capitalist abuses, never occurred to Marx.
Problem solved.
But Marx was not at all authoritarian, and is on record being against a strong state, and wanted the state to "whither away and die".

Still on the battingend of a no-hitter.

What a maroon.


Marx was an agent of and worshipper of, the Devil.

“In his poem entitled The Player, Marx penned these words:

“The hellish vapours rise and fill the brain, till I go mad and my heart is utterly changed.

See this sword? The prince of darkness sold it to me.”

The poem, downplayed by his supporters, certainly speaks of a satanic connection to Karl Marx’s theory. But not only that, it ties into the violence and murder that defined much of the communist oppression. [And, have you seen Democrat Utopia, Portland?]



But it doesn’t stop there In another poem called Invocation of One in Despair, Marx writes:

So a god has snatched from me my all
In the curse and rack of destiny,
All his worlds are gone beyond recall, nothing but revenge is left in me.

I shall build my throne high overhead.
Cold, tremendous shall its summit be
For its bulwark — superstitious dread.
For its marshal — blackest agony.

When you combine the worlds “I shall build my throne high overhead” with words from a second poem where Marx declares himself equal with God:

Then I will be able to walk triumphantly
Like a god, through the rains of their kingdom
Every word of mine is fire and action.
My breast is equal to that of the Creator.

You begin to see an unmistakable parallel with words of the prophet Isaiah who described the fall of Satan:

“But you (Satan) said in your heart,
‘I will ascend to heaven;
I will raise my throne above the stars of God,
And I will sit on the mount of assembly
In the recesses of the north. (Isaiah 14:13-14 NASV)”
Was Karl Marx and the rise of communism influenced by Satan?



Understanding this connection makes it so much simpler to see where this comes from:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is even sillier.
Marx caused no evil at all, and in fact only wrote theoretically back around 1830.

Seems you don't consider the slaughter of nearly 200 million human beings "evil."

Marxism, Communism, socialism, Maoism, Militant Secularism, Progressivism.......all from the same origin.

.... the Nazis found it more useful to stress differences, and the earlier campaign posters showing similarities disappeared, posters with both the hammer and sickle and the swastika.



a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."

George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.



b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."

Vladimir Bukovsky.






And all evil.

You are a total imbecile......I bet you hear that a lot.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is crazy.
Marx was Jewish and never "advocated racial extermination" of anyone, ever.

Marx was never Jewish, you gormless idiot.

. Karl Marx was a descendant of scholars. Both his parents came from rabbinic families, and his father was a lawyer.

In America, the education industry has been co-opted by neo-Marxists, yet they find it advantageous to keep this fact from view. This might explain why very little emphasis is placed on the totalitarianism that came from the French Revolution, and the godfather of statism, Jean Jacques Rousseau. Anti-Semitism caused the family to convert, and become Protestant.

Karl was six when his father converted the family, and never believed he was Jewish, nor did he ever study Judaism. He was, per his writings, anti-Semitic to the core.


Karl Marx’s “father Heinrich Marx, a lawyer, whose name originally was Hirschel ha-Levi Marx, was the son of a rabbi and Talmudic scholar, descended from the famous Rabbi Elieser ha-Levi of Mainz, whose son Jehuda Minz was head of the Talmudic School of Padua. Marx’s mother Henrietta Pressborck was the daughter of a rabbi likewise descended from famous scholars and sages. The family was quintessentially middle-class and rising in the world. The father was a liberal and described as ‘a real eighteenth- century Frenchman, who knew his Voltaire and Rousseau inside out’.” Paul Johnson, “Intellectuals.”





Have you ever read a book, you dunce????

Book: a written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That is even sillier.
Marx caused no evil at all, and in fact only wrote theoretically back around 1830.

It must take quite an effort to be as stupid as you are.
Do you take B12 shots????



. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."

George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.



a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust."

Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981



b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."

George Watson.

 

[jwoodie]

That is silly.

That is even sillier.

That is crazy.

That is supercilious.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Good German didn't know he was a Nazi.


1. During the 19th century, the center for learning was Germany. In fact, many of American 'influencers' and elites either studied in German universities or employed teachers and tutors who had, and that thinking went into what we call the Democrats/Progressives who rule America today.
The Germans have a history of embracing authoritarian rule. As the German philosopher Hegel said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest” (Ralf Dahrendorf, Society and Democracy in Germany).


2. Academia was flush with Hegelian thought. And it all bent to to the radial Left.
Research will prove that the ideology was born of German scholarship and the work of Hegel, and this euro-thinking placed the ruler above the ruled: Germans have a history of accepting authoritarian rule.... Just about every early Progressive studied in Germany, or had tutors who did.
It is authoritarian, and statist.....and Nazi.



3.That brings us to that "witness," the Good German, intelligent, civilized.....yet accomodated into Nazi thinking.
If one sat down with a German acquaintance in the late 30s early 40s, and told them what they supported....by overwhelming numbers, in fact,......how would they explain it????

4. They wouldn't.
That's becasue those infected with the Mass Psychosis don't realize what they have become.
“When a society descends into madness, the results are always devastating. Jung, who studied mass psychoses, wrote that the individuals who make up the affected society “become morally and spiritually inferior.” They become “unreasonable, irresponsible, emotional, erratic and unreliable.”
Worst of all, a psychotic mob will engage in atrocities that any solitary individual within the group would normally never consider. Yet through it all, those affected remain unaware of their condition and cannot recognize the error in their ways."

Mass Psychosis — How an Entire Population Becomes Mentally Ill

When a society descends into madness, the results are always devastating.

covid19up.org

5. And so it is with Democrats today. When asked about their psychosis, they neither deny the facts presented, nor have any way to excuse or defend their psychosis.....they simply wander away.
This:
The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.



Try it.

Ask any Good German.....er, Democrat voter, to explain how they could possibly support this, and see if you get an answer.

 

[emilseine]

Unclear what the question is.

How has our urban world made pandemics more likely?

As more people have moved to cities, population density, human encroachment and increased global interconnectivity have contributed to the spread of infectious diseases.

www.gavi.org

 

[PoliticalChic]

How has our urban world made pandemics more likely?

As more people have moved to cities, population density, human encroachment and increased global interconnectivity have contributed to the spread of infectious diseases.

www.gavi.org

The individual to whom my post was addressed clarified the question as follows:

"Was Marx a cause of evil or more of an excuse for it?"


That question carries moment.

Your changing the subject, for some reason, doesn't.