Things get heated since Ana still hasn't officially signed the contract. She doesn't feel comfortable with the thought of Christian trying to punish her for his pleasure. He tells her that he doesn't want to hurt her nor does he want to do anything that she wouldn't want him to do. She asks him why he wants to do this, to which he responds that he is "fifty shades of fucked up". Christian takes Ana into the kitchen and pulls her pants down to show her how extreme their BDSM relationship can be. He says he will whip her butt six times with his belt, and he makes her count. After the sixth whip, Ana is mortified and she retreats to the bedroom to lie in bed and cry. She doesn't want to see Christian right now. She tells him she's fallen in love with him, but she knows that she can't be what he wants her to be.
Ana gets up and heads for the elevator. Christian follows her and tries to stop her from leaving, but her mind is made up. As she steps into the elevator, he calls out to her, "Ana..." She only says, "Christian" as the elevator doors shut.
===========================
Doesn't sound like this was right for her. So all the time it was going on anyway, it was not respecting her boundaries.
The only good part is that if she does leave the relationship
then at least for that. Some women can't do that but end up stuck, and just get used to the abuse in order to have the relationship.
Does not sound like domestic abuse. She was still a willing participant. She was curious about it and went along. As I said, the author is clueless about BDSM and the writing is terrible. This was probably the worst written book I have tried to read in my adult life. But Ana
was a willing participant. Domestic abuse victims are not. This sort of comparison, in fact, is harmful to those who are true victims of domestic abuse. They are NOT willing and, for whatever reason, believe that they either cannot leave or are responsible for the abuse.
Also, by all the traditional rules of BDSM, if she has not signed their contract (or at least given explicit verbal consent) nothing should have happened at all.
1. I would call it RELATIONSHIP abuse to be more clear
2. I agree NOTHING should have happened until it was clearly informed consent.
Since she didn't make up her mind until the end, THAT's when and what should have been considered her consent.
Not knowing yet doesn't count as consent. It's not fully informed. That's where people, especially women, get taken advantage of. Not knowing, not being sure, thinking it's okay to go along to see -- this is not enough justification and leads to abuse. People don't even know they are doing it, because they THINK it was consensual, when it turns out it really wasn't.
3. I guess I have higher standards on what is a "willing participant"
I've seen too much abuse by cultish bullying and oppression, both religious and political, taking advantage of people "not knowing, not being sure, not knowing of better alternatives, not being fully informed" and it's NOT RIGHT to force things on people ASSUMING they agree since they didn't protest enough
Sexual relations are especially sensitive, especially for women.
So these should be absolutely consensual, and if a woman doesn't really know what she wants,
like this character didn't stand up for what she wanted until the very end,
then that shouldn't be taken advantage of because you can't REVERSE the damage that was done in the meantime.
both women and men need to be educated and aware of this, or they walk right into the trap.
The guy can say ooops I didn't know that was hurting you, and walk away.
but the woman is left with the emotional damage from being pushed past her boundaries,
even if she didn't know she was crossing them.
As the local Women's center teaches it: "If it hurts, it's abuse"
I think our society is so used to abuse and bullying, we don't even know what it means to really consent
and how to respect that.