Meathead
Diamond Member
See, that's the point; I don't give a rat's ass. Why should I?Own it. You’ve earned it!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
See, that's the point; I don't give a rat's ass. Why should I?Own it. You’ve earned it!
Just the amazing out of riots against liberating exploited illegals shows itThe ICE raid at the pot farm exposes democrats as the slave masters that they are
Aren't you the guy who had an endless thread all of Trump memes from X?Memes mean nothing, and are the default retreat of the small minds, and the people embracing a deplorable ethic they cannot justify.
Would you settle for merely beating the snot out of them till they clear the road?Your partner stated he wants them run over.
Keep up!
LOL, you saw videos taken by the protesters. OF COURSE they aren't going to show their side doing anything wrong.I saw none of the protestors getting violent but certainly many cops were.
Ok......
WASHINGTON — When federal police officers violently cleared protesters from the city's Lafayette Square in June 2020, they did it so a contractor could install fencing — not to let President Donald Trump hold a photo opportunity at a nearby church, an investigation by the Interior Department's inspector general has found.
That finding, published Wednesday, is likely to surprise many critics of Trump, who have long asserted that the president or his attorney general ordered the operation to pave the way for an act of political theater. That is also the central allegation of a federal lawsuit by Black Lives Matter against the Justice Department.
The report found no evidence of that, but did find that Attorney General William Barr urged officials to speed up the clearing process once Trump had decided to walk through the area that evening.
![]()
Trump photo op not why police chased protesters from park, report says
But the report did find that Attorney General Barr urged officials to speed up the process once Trump had decided to walk through the area.www.nbcnews.com
You must be one of the parents who watch helplessly as their children sew mayhem in public placesProtestors blocking roads should simply be DRIVEN THROUGH using large trucks.
This is not an appropriate place to share your perversions.
Repeating yourself is not an argument.Nope exploiting people for cheap labor is a demafasict thing…a historic practice of tyrants
The GOP is the anti slavery party and party of freedom
Too much fact and too little fake feeling for lib loonsOk......
WASHINGTON — When federal police officers violently cleared protesters from the city's Lafayette Square in June 2020, they did it so a contractor could install fencing — not to let President Donald Trump hold a photo opportunity at a nearby church, an investigation by the Interior Department's inspector general has found.
That finding, published Wednesday, is likely to surprise many critics of Trump, who have long asserted that the president or his attorney general ordered the operation to pave the way for an act of political theater. That is also the central allegation of a federal lawsuit by Black Lives Matter against the Justice Department.
The report found no evidence of that, but did find that Attorney General William Barr urged officials to speed up the clearing process once Trump had decided to walk through the area that evening.
![]()
Trump photo op not why police chased protesters from park, report says
But the report did find that Attorney General Barr urged officials to speed up the process once Trump had decided to walk through the area.www.nbcnews.com
It’s not speechYour thread title seems to be intentionally dishonest.
It was Police having the altercations with protesters. But I am of the opinon that blocking bridges or other roads, access to businesses, etc. are NOT peaceful protests and if people do not disperse when ordered by the police, whatever force is necessary to make them to that is appropriate.
No one is above the law. And that goes for those protesting ICE raids.
What's wrong with racial profiling?Repeating yourself is not an argument.
Right now, your “party of freedom” is conducting public harassment,racial profiling, imprisoning people without charge or due process, and railroading them into hastily built makeshift prisons.
And, the “z party of freedom” had radically increased funding for a national level political police force. One that tries to hide its identity as they are beating people up.
“party of freedom”…….what a sick joke.
Well physical acts have been defended as 'speech' i.e. media opinion, artistic expression and such.It’s not speech
It’s a physical act
Verified by NBC......That was the first excuse they floated. Which, like so many Trump excuses, was preposterous.
One ordered to by USSS. That park becomes property of SS.And what contractor would normally put up a wall of temporary fence on Sunday night at 7PM?
Right now, your “party of freedom” is conducting public harassment,racial profiling, imprisoning people without charge or due process, and railroading them into hastily built makeshift prisons.
Does it matter?
Donald Trump had little trouble ordering the Park police and National Guard to attack and tear gas a lawfully assembled, permitted and peaceful protest on June 1 2020.
Now he’s trying to do the same thing on a national scale. And he is recruiting a national police force to do it.
Straight out of Nazi Germany.
And Trumpsters are cheering for it
your claim about Charlottesville is false. The white supremacist rally at U Va that Friday night was not permitted.
it was peaceful?lawfully assembled, permitted and peaceful protest on June 1 2020.
There are times racial profiling is the honorable thing to do. If a bunch of black gang bangers commit a serous reported crime, it would be ridiculous for the police to check out white people of probably European descent along with black people in their search for the criminals.What's wrong with racial profiling?
The following seems to be off topic but as an illustration it fits into the idea of RACIAL PROFILING WHAT YOU BROUGHT UP.
"A report in 2014, opens new tab made a conservative estimate that more than 1,400 girls were sexually exploited in the town of Rotherham between 1997 and 2013. Many were already known to local services because they were in care or had been subject to neglect.
It said girls as young as 11 were raped by large numbers of male perpetrators. It said local officials deemed the children to be having consensual sexual intercourse.
The report said the majority of known perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage and that in some cases local officials and other agencies had been wary of identifying ethnic origins for fear of upsetting community cohesion, or being seen as racist."
(Bold emphasis is mine)
So it was mostly peaceful, as CNN would say.it was peaceful?
"Protesters piled up road signs and plastic barriers and lit a raging fire in the middle of H Street. Some pulled an American flag from a nearby building and threw it into the blaze. Others added branches pulled from trees. A cinder block structure, on the north side of the park, that had bathrooms and a maintenance office, was engulfed in flames."
Yes, but not always.This part: the right of the people peaceably to assemble.
were the protestors peaceful?
But you’ve got an empty head.I had a zit on my ass when I was a kid that was more American than you. Smarter too.
Mostly peaceful. LOLYes, but not always.
Are the cops always peaceful when confronting Americans peacefully demonstrating?
I had a zit on my ass when I was a kid that was more American than you.