Proof of Democrat lawfare.

Nostra

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
77,042
Reaction score
67,852
Points
3,615
Spin this. Liberal judges executing the. democrat lawfare plan.


1748227412992.webp
 
Spin this. Liberal judges executing the. democrat lawfare plan.


View attachment 1115480
The Deep State likes team players which = one is either a Big G'ment player or ya get tortured. Slick Willie, Jr. Bushwhacker(his dad included), Obombus were all big g'ment backers. The Trumpster is 180 degrees off course to what the big g'ment backers desire to have as a president, hence pres. Trump is currently getting napalmed. It's up to our American constituency to vote the McConnell's out of office like pres. Trump can't do it all by himself. It will be interesting to see how the mid term elections turn out!
 
We need information about the basis of these injunctions.
 
The Deep State likes team players which = one is either a Big G'ment player or ya get tortured. Slick Willie, Jr. Bushwhacker(his dad included), Obombus were all big g'ment backers. The Trumpster is 180 degrees off course to what the big g'ment backers desire to have as a president, hence pres. Trump is currently getting napalmed. It's up to our American constituency to vote the McConnell's out of office like pres. Trump can't do it all by himself. It will be interesting to see how the mid term elections turn out!
Primary all the jackasses! Lists are being made and people are fired up and that's not going away.
They better do something about these circuit judges sooner rather than later, too.
That's absolute horseshit going on there.
 
Clinton Obama Biden - zero injunctions.
It’s accurate that Trump has faced more injunctions related to his immigration actions than other recent presidents. Only one of the other presidents listed in the post, Barack Obama, faced an injunction for an immigration-related action, and the action was related to keeping immigrants in the country rather than deporting them. Experts told PolitiFact the difference in the presidents’ injunctions numbers is because Trump’s actions have challenged constitutional norms.

Among injunctions for all issues — not just those related to immigration — a Harvard Law Review count showed 12 nationwide injunctions against Clinton’s policies; six against Bush’s; 12 against Obama’s; 64 against Trump’s during his first term; and 14 against Biden’s. The law review data showed no injunctions against Clinton’s and Bush’s deportation actions.

 
Experts told PolitiFact the difference in the presidents’ injunctions numbers is because Trump’s actions have challenged constitutional norms.
LOL Let me guess. the same "experts" that work for MSNBC
 
Back
Top Bottom