Project Veritas Video- Pfizer Exec Admits They Are Manipulating the Virus & Subverting Regulators For Profits

[Missourian]

if its been scrubbed then it because its fake. The follow up visit by PV is interesting. It is either completely staged or the guy may work for Pfizer but probably not as a director. Anyway their should be a police report.

Why would a pr department scrub a fake account?

They would highlight that it was fake.

And still no statement from Pfizer.

Still no comments allowed on a single Pfizer tweet.



Last Tweet was over 48 hours ago...last reply allowed was over 48 hours ago.

Your opinion just doesn't hold water son.

Are you a Pfizer bot by any chance?

 

[Jim H - VA USA]

They do not engineer viruses.

Goodness grief. Pfizer says in my quote of them which you are replying to and arguing about...

"such virus may be engineered"

Have a good evening.

 

[sparky]

Specific is Pfizer vaccine-linked mutation N969K. Pfizer knows who got its "vaccine," and why N969K arose in Omicron and no other SARS2 strains. duh

Badger, with all due respect it's just above my pay grade.....~S~

 

[Missourian]

 

[badger2]

Badger, with all due respect it's just above my pay grade.....~S~

The reason that mutation is vaccine-linked is because the spike protein has to first be (stabilized [italics]) for vaccine production. Omicron's mutation happens precisely in the region supposed to be stabilized, in fact at the penultimate amino acid before the end of one of these regions of the spike. This is why, whether or not it came from an AIDS patient or the lab, Omicron N969K mutation is a vaccine-linked mutation, the only one thusfar from this region of the spike of SARS2.

Furthermore, the link to post #174 of this thread is when we mentioned this mutation on 23 Dec 2021.
Post #195

Fully vaxxed fake native American Elizabeth Warren tests positive for Covid

They can, or some cures are tied to a sealed patent so info doesn’t leak out. Huge money in keeping people sick with ailments. Huge investing in Dr. Scholl and Co. with preventatives, but never a cure released. All about big money. Unpaid Education Is the Greatest Lie Ever Told They're not...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[badger2]

So this Omicron-mouse study is at Pubmed and it shows affiliations and locations:

Evidence for a mouse origin of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant - PubMed

The rapid accumulation of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant that enabled its outbreak raises questions as to whether its proximal origin occurred in humans or another mammalian host. Here, we identified 45 point mutations that Omicron acquired since divergence from the B.1.1 lineage...

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

'....State Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics....'

Does Kayeka (post #174) know of the the plant-signaling link we've posted for Worobey and his co-author, Guan-Zhu Han?

 

[badger2]

The authors of the study do say that the N969K is a site shared with pre-outbreak Omicron mutations, though says nothing more about it. The report focuses on the RBD (receptor binding domain) mutations but never mentions the heptad repeat region where the N969K mutation resides, never mentions that this is a (vaccine-linked region [italics]).

 

[beagle9]

YouTube keeps censoring...

View attachment 751695​

YouTube removing or censoring content eh ??? ROTFLMBO ..... So they are throwing stone's that they can't throw eh ?? Unbelievable..

 

[Kilroy2]

We're not buying it. Walker is a product of the UT system. He links to Dallas. Menachery, who teamed with Baric to deliver the disturbing 2015 GoF bat coronavirus paper, is UT, Galveston-based.

he may work for the company but it is doubtful that he is who he says it is. Still it appears the PV hid the camera and the video is chopped as in pieces are missing. It has no flow and only like bits an pieces of a conversation. Unless PV releases the full video then we can see where this is going.

Here is the new video and the guy has a different story saying he was set up by PV because he thought it was on a date. Appears he might also be gay. Still this was a secret recording by PV. So the guys life is ruin for a news story. He admits that he was lying to impress the date. In this video he tries to call the police He admits he is not a scientist in this new video. see it before it disappears or is edited.

 

[Kilroy2]

Goodness grief. Pfizer says in my quote of them which you are replying to and arguing about...

"such virus may be engineered"

Have a good evening.

well let me put the complete statement instead of part of the statement.

In the ongoing development of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, Pfizer has not conducted gain of function or directed evolution research. That was my point.

In a limited number of cases when a full virus does not contain any known gain of function mutations, such virus may be engineered to enable the assessment of antiviral activity in cells. You did not mention the first part of the quote.

QUOTE
It is important to note that these studies are required by U.S. and global regulators for all antiviral products and are carried out by many companies and academic institutions in the U.S. and around the world.

Okay so they DO say that they do engineering when required by regulators on a full virus that does not have any known gain of function in the secure Biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory.

Still they clearly state this is not the case with there COVID 19 vaccine. that was my point.

Still gain of function was done for a long time until they made a mistake in 2011 and then it became a argument of what could happen if a the virus escaped due to human error or the bad guys got a hold of it and released it.

 

[Burgermeister]

This should be one of the biggest stories out there, but I could not find any coverage on legacy media, except for a Forbes article and this "fact check" article from Newsweek, which was also posted on msn.com. It isn't a fact check, but rather a general bashing of Project Veritas, then critique on commentary about the facts - "Whatever the facts are about its latest video, some of the claims that it has inspired misrepresent the content of the video itself."

Forbes took a similar approach to minimizing the story. It attacked Tucker Carlson's coverage of it. First it bashed Carlson - "But before Carlson’s claim makes you sit bolt upright in your chair, keep in mind that this was Carlson who had said this."

Then it disputes the identity of the Pfizer employee, then it event tries to claim that scientific evidence points to a natural origin for Covid - "Umm, first of all, there is currently not enough evidence to say that “Covid broke out of the lab” as Carlson did. The preponderance of scientific evidence so far has strongly suggested that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had a natural origin, jumping from other animals to humans. So Carlson was really jumping to no real evidence to conclusions pretty quickly."

Still sticking with the imaginary bats at the wet market, eh?

And of course, it offers the idea that this is staged, and ridicules Project Veritas - by quoting someone else's article about Project Veritas!

These people are a joke. The story is obviously being spiked and it is an outrage.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

One man's observations is one thing, proof of such activities is another. Yet the lines have been drawn and the truth lies in the eyes of the beholder and not based on provable facts.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder................ not truth. Truth is truth. There is nothing ambiguous about truth. Its not a changing narrative from one person to another.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

This should be one of the biggest stories out there, but I could not find any coverage on legacy media, except for a Forbes article and this "fact check" article from Newsweek, which was also posted on msn.com. It isn't a fact check, but rather a general bashing of Project Veritas, then critique on commentary about the facts - "Whatever the facts are about its latest video, some of the claims that it has inspired misrepresent the content of the video itself."

Forbes took a similar approach to minimizing the story. It attacked Tucker Carlson's coverage of it. First it bashed Carlson - "But before Carlson’s claim makes you sit bolt upright in your chair, keep in mind that this was Carlson who had said this."

Then it disputes the identity of the Pfizer employee, then it event tries to claim that scientific evidence points to a natural origin for Covid - "Umm, first of all, there is currently not enough evidence to say that “Covid broke out of the lab” as Carlson did. The preponderance of scientific evidence so far has strongly suggested that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had a natural origin, jumping from other animals to humans. So Carlson was really jumping to no real evidence to conclusions pretty quickly."

Still sticking with the imaginary bats at the wet market, eh?

And of course, it offers the idea that this is staged, and ridicules Project Veritas - by quoting someone else's article about Project Veritas!

These people are a joke. The story is obviously being spiked and it is an outrage.

Yeah, its still bat soup from wongs chinese restaurant around the corner from the wuhan lab. These people will believe anything. They need for the govt and media to regurgitate their food and information. They have no logical thought nor do they want to know the truth.

 

[beagle9]

he may work for the company but it is doubtful that he is who he says it is. Still it appears the PV hid the camera and the video is chopped as in pieces are missing. It has no flow and only like bits an pieces of a conversation. Unless PV releases the full video then we can see where this is going.

Here is the new video and the guy has a different story saying he was set up by PV because he thought it was on a date. Appears he might also be gay. Still this was a secret recording by PV. So the guys life is ruin for a news story. He admits that he was lying to impress the date. In this video he tries to call the police He admits he is not a scientist in this new video. see it before it disappears or is edited.

And so you find yourself in agreement with the victim, otherwise that he was just lying in order to impress ?? That's a weird way to want to impress someone wouldn't you think ?? So you take side's with a liar or a con-man ?

 

[Ame®icano]

Project Veritas drops the video.
Pfizer and Google instantly scrub everything about the guy in the video.
YouTube gives Project Veritas a strike.
The army of "he doesn't even work for Pfizer" glowies and vaxies hammer everyone who talk about it.

So Pfizer release the statement about something that they were totally not doing on a guy who doesn't exist.

Pfizer Responds to Research Claims​

"they setting the record straight"

 

[badger2]

This should be one of the biggest stories out there, but I could not find any coverage on legacy media, except for a Forbes article and this "fact check" article from Newsweek, which was also posted on msn.com. It isn't a fact check, but rather a general bashing of Project Veritas, then critique on commentary about the facts - "Whatever the facts are about its latest video, some of the claims that it has inspired misrepresent the content of the video itself."

Forbes took a similar approach to minimizing the story. It attacked Tucker Carlson's coverage of it. First it bashed Carlson - "But before Carlson’s claim makes you sit bolt upright in your chair, keep in mind that this was Carlson who had said this."

Then it disputes the identity of the Pfizer employee, then it event tries to claim that scientific evidence points to a natural origin for Covid - "Umm, first of all, there is currently not enough evidence to say that “Covid broke out of the lab” as Carlson did. The preponderance of scientific evidence so far has strongly suggested that the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had a natural origin, jumping from other animals to humans. So Carlson was really jumping to no real evidence to conclusions pretty quickly."

Still sticking with the imaginary bats at the wet market, eh?

And of course, it offers the idea that this is staged, and ridicules Project Veritas - by quoting someone else's article about Project Veritas!

These people are a joke. The story is obviously being spiked and it is an outrage.

Can't say about the fragmented videos. Walker's cynicism compares with Baric's, the latter saying something like , "Sure, I created SARS2." The University of Texas link, however, still stands: Baric's co-author Menachery links to Walker, a Galveston-Dallas UT link.

 

[badger2]

Project Veritas drops the video.
Pfizer and Google instantly scrub everything about the guy in the video.
YouTube gives Project Veritas a strike.
The army of "he doesn't even work for Pfizer" glowies and vaxies hammer everyone who talk about it.

So Pfizer release the statement about something that they were totally not doing on a guy who doesn't exist.

Pfizer Responds to Research Claims​

"they setting the record straight"

In the video, Dr. Campbell goes off-track (in some opinions) by focusing on monkeys when he should have at that point made the plant connection to "gain-of-susceptibility" which we have already done here at USMB.

He mentions the danger of GoF though leaves out the fact that Baric-Menachery was allowed to proceed with research on their disturbing viral recombinant in 2015, that those authors themselves suggested there may be no vaccine for.

So to return back to the first Chinese psychopath who sequenced SARS2, Yong-Zhen Zhang, we note the plant connection to his co-author, Guan-Zhu Han is a connection for "gain-of-susceptibility" in plants, the flip-side of GoF.

 

[badger2]

Not even Dr. Quay, who published the RGD motif of the Chinese military's virus, ZC45, has mentioned its correlate RGD motif on the SARS2 spike. Dr. Campbell should mention the RGD motif on the SARS2 spike, because it links to a gain-of-susceptibility, not a gain-of-function. The latter may only happen after the fact for the plant to gain resistance against the pathogen:

14 Dec 2022 Post #1,539 Guan-Zhu Han / Plant Signaling

COVID-19’s Biological Politics

Washington Officials Traded Stocks with Exquisite Timing https://twitter.com/R_H_Ebright

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Kilroy2]

And so you find yourself in agreement with the victim, otherwise that he was just lying in order to impress ?? That's a weird way to want to impress someone wouldn't you think ?? So you take side's with a liar or a con-man ?

Well look at it this way. The guy says that he was on a date and obviously he probably gay. So if the PV guy pretended to be interested in him then yeah he might embellish things to impress a person he wants to have sex with or get to know. People embellish things to impress others. The recording was from a hidden camera by PV that went to his house.

Now you have to ask if the guy knew that PV wanted to record him making statements about his job, that he would not agree to that because he would be fired. Common sense here.

So it makes sense that it was a secret recording. The guy did not know he was being recorded. The recorded video has been edited and does not flow as PV deleted portions that might cast doubt.

On the second video the guy wanted to call the police on them.

PV needs to provide the complete video.

Second PV if they recorded this guy in his home without his permission is facing a lawsuit.

If I was Pfizer and he was an employee, then I would fund this lawsuit and we can find out what went down.

PV invaded this mans privacy for trying to find out a story. Probably destroyed his career and life in general.

 

[Lastamender]

Well look at it this way. The guy says that he was on a date and obviously he probably gay. So if the PV guy pretended to be interested in him then yeah he might embellish things to impress a person he wants to have sex with or get to know. People embellish things to impress others. The recording was from a hidden camera by PV that went to his house.

Now you have to ask if the guy knew that PV wanted to record him making statements about his job, that he would not agree to that because he would be fired. Common sense here.

So it makes sense that it was a secret recording. The guy did not know he was being recorded. The recorded video has been edited and does not flow as PV deleted portions that might cast doubt.

On the second video the guy wanted to call the police on them.

PV needs to provide the complete video.

Second PV if they recorded this guy in his home without his permission is facing a lawsuit.

If I was Pfizer and he was an employee, then I would fund this lawsuit and we can find out what went down.

PV invaded this mans privacy for trying to find out a story. Probably destroyed his career and life in general.

I would not worry about Pfizer. I would worry about what appears, more than ever, to be a bio-weapon meant to kill.