AntiParty
Tea is the new Kool-Aid
- Mar 12, 2014
- 4,054
- 362
- 85
I went to the local show today. Its like an annual fete, or carnival, with rides and such like what you guys have over there.
Lots of kids attend because there are petting zoos and heaps of rides and games for the little ones to enjoy, and showbags etc.
I was walking through one of the halls, looking at everything, when I came across a pro life stall. It was an anti abortion group located in my city (I have never been aware of the until now) and they had these little plastic dolls displayed, saying 'this is what you looked like at 12 weeks' and what they were showing was an extremely well developed plastic fetus, which looks nothing like what we look like at that early stage.
They advertised that they provide support and counseling for pregnancy, nothing even suggested that they were an anti abortion group. Their website states that they don't refer for abortion, and they quote false statistics that abortion causes mental illness, etc.
As this annual show is attended by many small children, and I believe that a political agenda should NOT be pushed on anyone at such an event, I am interested to hear what you all think.
I am firmly pro choice, but if a pro choice group set up there I would feel the same outrage as I don't believe a venue attended by children should be dominated by people pushing their beliefs on others.
Opinions?
I love your perspective and respect it. Please try to absorb mine.
Abortion is about politics on one side but about Religion on the other. Neither of these arguments are valid and end in years worth of arguments on all forums. The only thing we can do to make Abortion Obsolete is ensure people in their sexual years have access to protective gear. Noting what years these may be is a debate on it's own. Noting what happens if they have access to this protective gear and still making the mistake is a debate on it's own.
Today's debate is utterly stupid.
"It's a child not a choice" is backed by science. "It's killing a child" is backed by Religion, not science today. (Science develops/evolves much more than religion)
I would think ample birth control could save us from this debate. Except some Religions say if you were meant to have a baby, you will have one and it's the work of god....................They didn't notice God delegated the responsibilities to run this world to the people when he stopped talking to us, yep, god never talked to you directly, that was your inner monologue.
A man today can walk away from a baby with no parental consequences. A woman can not!<--This is where "choice" comes into play. Why are people only attacking the choice of the woman and not the man? Why do men have the right to decide not to be a parent yet the women can't? At this point, certainly, some can see the flaw in the discussion "It's not a choice, it's a child".
I personally wonder how many rubbers, Combination pills, Progestin-only pills, Extended-cycle pills, Vaginal Rings, Diaphragms, IUD's, Female Condomns, Patches, Implants, Sterilizations, and Plan B Pills could have been purchased by the amount of $$$ people spent on Anti-Abortion Lobbying.
Or, we can stick to abstinence. Nothing ever went wrong with that ideology...................(except "sling shot affect" where people deprived of something too long go crazy like preists raping children)
That's my humble opinion..

Last edited: