Press has the right to protect sources

[Auld Phart]

Well, it's the trumpettes who are 75 % high school educated. Maybe the dreaded liberal (from the Latin, liber = free, for the individual and free speech - thought you would be one) had a point

Līber m (genitive Līberī); second declension

1. (Roman myth) An Italian deity of planting and fruiting; associated with the Roman Bacchus.

 

[RealDave]

Can you link to where he said reporters must reveal their source, in other than national security?

Obama prosecutions of reporters - Bing

Leaks regarding national security is not the same as leaks about what Trump is crying about. People are talking about just how dysfunctional Trump is. That is common knowledge & certainly no secret.

He said it in relation to the Russian contacts. He said they should or else they should not be believed.

You can play word games all you want you want to try to protect Trump. But words have meanings & he says this shit & you people look the other way.

 

[depotoo]

Word games is all you've got, not I.

Can you link to where he said reporters must reveal their source, in other than national security?

Obama prosecutions of reporters - Bing

Leaks regarding national security is not the same as leaks about what Trump is crying about. People are talking about just how dysfunctional Trump is. That is common knowledge & certainly no secret.

He said it in relation to the Russian contacts. He said they should or else they should not be believed.

You can play word games all you want you want to try to protect Trump. But words have meanings & he says this shit & you people look the other way.

 

[RealDave]

Yes and people have a right to dismiss claims made by unknown sources. An unknown source can be someone telling the truth they can also be someone with a grudge who is lying. Today's media is willing to use either if it suits there purpose which is just one of the reasons so many no longer trust them.

I see you have been duped by Trump's attacks on the media. Reliable news sources such as the Times,. Post, etc have reputations based on years of good solid investigative reporting. They get a source & then verify their claims.

This idea you & your orange buddy have that these sources are making up shit is just pathetic.

If you read it in these reliable sources, then you can rest assured there is something to the story.

They have reported on contacts between the Trump campaign & Russian officials.

Today's media is no different than yesterday's media as far as the major mews sources.

The only diffiencve is a lying Trump duping the feeble minded into believing hos fake news crap.

Wow not an original thought in your reply thanks for the liberal paint by the numbers talking points response useless as always. The only feeble minded one here is you the one who parrots the far left party line no questions asked.

This from a Trumpette. Now that's some funny chit.

You don't even know how the Press works. How it develops its stories. If they report something bad about Trump you dipsticks run screaming " OMG OMG OMG Fake News!!!! Fake News!!!": And you prove so much proof that Trump won the uneducated vote.

 

[blackhawk]

Yes and people have a right to dismiss claims made by unknown sources. An unknown source can be someone telling the truth they can also be someone with a grudge who is lying. Today's media is willing to use either if it suits there purpose which is just one of the reasons so many no longer trust them.

I see you have been duped by Trump's attacks on the media. Reliable news sources such as the Times,. Post, etc have reputations based on years of good solid investigative reporting. They get a source & then verify their claims.

This idea you & your orange buddy have that these sources are making up shit is just pathetic.

If you read it in these reliable sources, then you can rest assured there is something to the story.

They have reported on contacts between the Trump campaign & Russian officials.

Today's media is no different than yesterday's media as far as the major mews sources.

The only diffiencve is a lying Trump duping the feeble minded into believing hos fake news crap.

Wow not an original thought in your reply thanks for the liberal paint by the numbers talking points response useless as always. The only feeble minded one here is you the one who parrots the far left party line no questions asked.

This from a Trumpette. Now that's some funny chit.

You don't even know how the Press works. How it develops its stories. If they report something bad about Trump you dipsticks run screaming " OMG OMG OMG Fake News!!!! Fake News!!!": And you prove so much proof that Trump won the uneducated vote.

You don't even see the irony in your idiot replies do you? You one of the many far left morons who called every negative story about President Obama and candidate Clinton a phony scandal or a partisan witch hunt. You want to see uneducated look in one of these.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

What top secret? That Trump colluded with the Russians to hack our elections? That secret?

Let's pretend you're the best hacker in the world. How would you hack our elections. Be as creative as you want and give us a plausible scenario.

If you can't, then shut the **** up about that lie.