bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,369
- 2,180
- Thread starter
- #141
You gotta love these Dims who claim there's no evidence of voter fraud. We now have two videos that show voter fraud. Here's the 2nd:
Then the number of votes cast and the number of voters would be way off. It didn't happen.
Not only that, but they've testified now numerous times why re-scans happen, and re-scans don't count the same Vote twice. The software prevents it. They're rescanned because there was a scan error on the first run through.
People like bripat are abject fucking morons. They fall for anything if its what they want to hear, fact checks and failed court cases be damned and now...the very SOURCES of these stories, like Newsmax, are publicly retracting because they're being faced with a lawsuit...and here we STILL cannot fix STEEWWWPIDDD
So they are rescanning piles of ballots multiple times because of errors? You can't be that stupid.
Yes, dipshit. The machine Counts in batches so that tracing back any particular Vote upon audit is easier to do. You know? For Election Integrity.
If one ballot in a batch fails to count, there's a scanning error. You know? So that every American Patriot's Vote is sacrosanct, and counts. The machine then restarts the batch, you know? Because of the error. This was testified to, under oath, and all Court cases to the contrary have failed. Wanna know why? Because the recounts match up.
So you sit there with a "but but but" with your thumb up your ass looking like a Cult sycophant who believes everything he's told, even THOUGH its now been retracted by Fox and Newsmax...but guess what? Reality doesn't care about your butthurt and stupidity.
But morons like you, who cannot grasp the most basic shit on the fucking planet, sit in your disgusting computer chairs going, "finkle...einhorn...finkle...einhorn. I get it! Finkle IS Einhorn! Derpa derp derp derp, derpitty derp."
You haven't explained why they would run a stack of ballots through the machine multiple times. When did the woman even check for an error?
Yes, I literally just explained it. And so did the professionals that program the machines, under oath, and so did the workers who scanned the Votes, and their location supervisors.
You "understanding" the process isn't some prerequisite. You're an anti knowledge fuggin dipshit on a message board. You don't matter.
At all.
No you didn't. The same batch was run through multiple times. Your "explanation" would justify running it through again once. How are the "batches" even determine? It looks like the woman just grabs a hand full of ballots.
You idiots fell for the Russia! Russia! Russia! hoax for 3 years and put half a dozen people through utter hell, but you just swallow anything these criminal election officials say. Yeah, right.
No, dumbass, the explanation is that the batch is run as many times as it takes for the error to be resolved. And rerunning batches doesn't recount batches. Why are you so fucking dumb?
The woman didn't even check the results, moron. That excuse is obviously a lie.
Last edited: