As long as it doesn't encourage kids to drop out of school. Getting a diploma is pretty necessary these days and once a kid drops out, it's damned hard for them to go back and earn their equivalency.
normally i'd agree but a diploma for what? our education system is far from "good". in fact we are the epitome of average.
U.S. Falls In World Education Rankings, Rated 'Average' | HuffPost
so if kids want a leg up on whatever career they should choose, then it's time we evaluated everything in how we can improve. i *do agree* they should stay in school for at least high school but after that, it is whatever works for that persons chosen career field.
i wish we had a president that would work on our educational system with more than words and a passing glance. we could and should be so much better than we are today.
The diploma is expected, even for bag boys at the supermarket now. Whether or not it's a good education, the employers are expecting it. The military has really cracked down on it, too. Very few dropouts who returned for their GED's are getting in. Twenty years ago, that was not the case.
i graduated college in 88. i was told i must have that degree to get anywhere. since that time i don't think anyone has asked about it, nor has my GPA ever been brought up in a job or during an interview.
again - don't get me wrong - i agree we need to show and keep a baseline. but what we teach them in HS maybe needs to evolve as well. how we teach them certainly does. i'm not saying abandon it, i'm saying fix it.
I agree, but that's not really what this thread is about.
Vocational training is a big improvement in my book. For too long, too many kids were told that everyone needed college in order to be successful in life.
Maybe 25% are college material. The rest are kids who should go to trade school or get jobs straight out of high school and using their experience, working their way as far up the ladder as they can go.
Someone NEEDS to be the janitor or the flagger on the road construction crew, the waitress or the lawn crew, and that shouldn't be dismissed as "loser" work.
This.
Nail on the head correct.
Not so long ago, a family only needed one breadwinner to provide for it. My dad did so for his wife and kids, my wife's father did so for his. My dad was military, and although some times were hard, we made it through until us kids were old enough and mom decided she was tired of picking up after 4 kids that she rejoined the workforce, by choice. My in laws, same story but 7 kids to provide for... and she became a nurse.
Your last comment above... "loser work," I believe, has been imprinted on all of us to some extent, by the societal need of "being better" than those before us. A janitor doesn't want his kids cleaning toilets for a living, a waiter/waitress/server, who's done it for a long time, wants better for their offspring, the flagman, doesn't want their kids out in the weather, etc etc etc. Truth be told, nothing wrong with it, and sticking with it means you are employed. Doesn't pay as well as a CEO, but at the same time, it pays. No one, or at least very, very few comes out of college, with a degree, and starts at the top of the food chain.. gotta start somewhere.... great points you make, wish more people were aware of them.