Sherlock Holmes
Gold Member
- Jul 1, 2024
- 13,698
- 5,464
- 208
Not at all, you are the one who just injected "liberal" into a discussion about Venezuela.Huh?
Your brain sure jumps around a lot
See? you're a liberal, now **** off libtard.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not at all, you are the one who just injected "liberal" into a discussion about Venezuela.Huh?
Your brain sure jumps around a lot
First you bring up oilNot at all, you are the one who just injected "liberal" into a discussion about Venezuela.
View attachment 1157828
See? you're a liberal, now **** off libtard.
And in what particulars does the LOTS treaty support what you said. Cite the part if you’d be so kind.![]()
Law of the Sea
Discover the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and its provisions on territorial limits, vessel jurisdiction, and innocent passage.www.rya.org.uk
Maduro has 50,000 on the shores.Is this a pretext to invade?
It wasn't flagged. It's legal if the president issues a directive.....you know like Obama wacking a US citizen with a drone strike in a foreign land?Firing and sinking a foreign flagged, civilian vessel in international water without having been fired upon is not legal.
Don't think there's anything to split up.Maybe the drugs, if none recovered were split up among the patrol boat crew, for all I know.![]()
Assets already on the ground.Warm up to Mexico Strikes
What does this have to do with a drug interdiction thread?Proof that wind and solar should be the future, until fusion becomes a reality.
Oops...What happens if it turns out not to be a drug boat and the navy kills them?
I bet it's on the table.Great idea! On top of that, we ought to hit production facilities like we did Iran.
Coast guard is and has been working together with our military and other nations military for some time.Exactly.
This is a job for the Coast Guard. Obviously they could have intercepted this boat and if there was any “mistakes” in identification they would have been able to deal with that
This sets a dangerous precedent
I'm sure we had boots and satellite Intel watching the whole time.Also dangerous for anyone misidentified as drug smugglers
That could be a headline from Kyiv. Trump hopes you don’t notice that Putin played him again.

no .. that's why I dont for democrats .Do you believe everything that known liars tell you?
"Flagged" does not always mean flies an actual flag. That boat was registered in a country. "Flagged" in that country. It was in international water. And yes, drone strikes against civilians are illegal as well.It wasn't flagged. It's legal if the president issues a directive.....you know like Obama wacking a US citizen with a drone strike in a foreign land?
That's nice. So no new war was started then?The attack was a deflection from Trump’s failures. He hopes you don’t notice that Putin played him again. So he punches down, like a bully.
I'm sure drug runners are completely up to date abiding with Venezuelan maritime law.That boat was registered in a country. "Flagged" in that country
Why wasn't Obama impeached and executed?And yes, drone strikes against civilians are illegal as well.
What does this have to do with a drug interdiction thread?Proof that wind and solar should be the future, until fusion becomes a reality.
Right or left I assume we are all for Justice? I dont think that qualifies as justice.Looks like it just got real.
I gave that some thought when I saw the strike. They either have assets in place or have been watching via satellite, or most likely both..... while they loaded.
Beyond that you can see the bales on the boat.
There's a drug interdiction effort ala cooperation between a bunch of SA countries with Navies and Intel dealing with the issue. Plus we just put a group of warships off the Venezuelan coast to say 'hi there'.
Dude.....vaporized. 11 dead.
We’ll see, but the sheeple have been distracted.That's nice. So no new war was started then?
So, what is your solution? Do you want drugs out of the US and its cities or not? Taking out production facilities and disrupting supply routes is a great step.True.
Also dangerous for anyone misidentified as drug smugglers
And we know for sure they were drug runners because?I'm sure drug runners are completely up to date abiding with Venezuelan maritime law.
Why wasn't Obama impeached and executed?
So, what is your solution? Do you want drugs out of the US and its cities or not? Taking out production facilities and disrupting supply routes is a great step.
Is there a possibility of innocent casualties? Yes. Will you people from the Left side and otherwise getTrump side try and disrupt its success? Yes..
I don't know, this help?We supplied no proof that I can see that American lives were in danger

They're pedaling death.How do we know everyone on that boat was guilty and deserved death?
It's a constant battle.....time for a shot across the bow.There are just so many things that are wrong with this that could have been made right.
The easiest way to tell the difference between right and wrong is that the wrong way is always easiest and the right way is always harder. Blowing up random boats is easy and wrong. Boarding and arresting criminals is hard and right.So, what is your solution? Do you want drugs out of the US and its cities or not? Taking out production facilities and disrupting supply routes is a great step.
Is there a possibility of innocent casualties? Yes. Will you people from the Left side and otherwise getTrump side try and disrupt its success? Yes..
It's given you a new purpose in your life.We’ll see, but the sheeple have been distracted.
Assets in place, satellite Intel.And we know for sure they were drug runners because?
It's all classified and compartmented.You would have to ask the politicians at the time.