there4eyeM
unlicensed metaphysician
- Jul 5, 2012
- 20,965
- 5,501
- 280
- Thread starter
- #161
That's an excuse?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Congress can do their job just like Obama and Hairy Reid did their jobs.The Congress also owes it to the people to do its job. This is said, not to defend the President (for whom I did not vote), but to criticize this élite that has taken over the country with its two party dictatorship.
Obama went around Congress and Hairy Reid sat on everything the House sent him until he was booted out.
So Obama deserves the same treatment he gave congress. Nothing but "Talk to the hand, asshole!"
Two wrongs don't make one right.
Now is never too soon to do the right thing.
no it dont quit being silly
the recess appointment ends with the prezbo
a>>>>new<<< congress may have a vote to confirm or deny the appointment
The two statements above are not the same thing. Sessions of congress do not end at the same time as a Presidential term.
Sessions of Congress are two years and the Presidents term is 4 years.
You are still wrong on two counts:
1. We are not talking about just "any" appointment, we are talking about recess appointments (blue). Those end with the session of congress, not with the presidential term.
2. Second point you are wrong about is that appointments that have already been confirmed by congress, even if the president changes, do not have to be re-confirmed as long askes them to stay in their current job. If the President nominates someone else for that position, then Congress must confirm that appointment. For example, Robert Gates was the Secretary of Defense under G.W. Bush from 2006-2009 and remained in that position under President Obama from 2009-2011. He did not have to go through another confirmation hearing under the new President because he'd already been confirmed under G. W. Bush for that position.
Guide to the Constitution
https://www.senate.gov/CRSReports/crs-publish.cfm?pid='0DP+P\W; P
>>>>
you have serious issues
get help
why do you make things up
you have serious issues
get help
why do you make things up
I didn't "make up" the fact that you were wrong.
You claim recess appointments end with the President, that's not true. Recess appointments expire at the end of the next congressional session. The two are not the same.
>>>>
yes you did
you made up a fake claim attributed to me
sad really that you have to resort to such tactics
if he places one while there is a recess the appointment ENDS with the ending of the PRESIDENCY
the recess appointment ends with the prezbo
yes you did
you made up a fake claim attributed to me
sad really that you have to resort to such tactics
Really, mind pointing out where?
I've responded to these incorrect statements:
if he places one while there is a recess the appointment ENDS with the ending of the PRESIDENCY
the recess appointment ends with the prezbo
Are these not your statements?
>>>>>
you know you did and it gets old and stale
go back and check your posts out
you know you did and it gets old and stale
go back and check your posts out
Did you know claim, as a quoted, that recess appointments end with the Presidency?
Since you did, my posts were accurate.
>>>>
yes they do unless confirmed
but you falsely attempted to accuse me of stating
that the confirmed end with the presidency
you are just a really dishonest poster
if he places one while there is a recess the appointment ENDS with the ending of the PRESIDENCY
the recess appointment ends with the prezbo
yes they do unless confirmed
Again, recess appointments do not end with end of the Presidency.
They end of the session of congress. The two are not the same.
but you falsely attempted to accuse me of stating
that the confirmed end with the presidency
Never address confirmed appointments.
Your statements were about recess appointments and you were wrong.
you are just a really dishonest poster
What is dishonest about addressing what you said?
Just man up and admit you were wrong.
if he places one while there is a recess the appointment ENDS with the ending of the PRESIDENCYthe recess appointment ends with the prezbo
>>>>
they end with the presidency
you certainly made the claim and you know it
there is no point in going on with you
you will continually disregard the Constitution
i am done with you
from here on in
every time i see you posting falsely
i will post the relevant sentences of the Constitution
Why do you keep running around in circlesthey end with the presidency
you certainly made the claim and you know it
I never claimed that recess appointments ended with the presidency.
That was you and argued against that point.
there is no point in going on with you
you will continually disregard the Constitution
United States Constution
Article II
Section 2
"The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session."
The Constitution says that the vacancies expire at the end of the congressional session, not the end of the Presidents term. The two are not the same. The "their" is referencing the session of Senate.
i am done with you
from here on in
every time i see you posting falsely
i will post the relevant sentences of the Constitution
I just did post the relevant sentence from the Constitution, a recess appointment expires at the end of the Congressional session, not with the end of the Presidents Term. If a President makes a recess appointment during the first year of his/her 4 year term, it exprires at the end of that Congresssional session which is the end of the 2nd year of the Presidents term, the recess appointment is not valid for the remainder of the Presidents time in office.
>>>>
Why do you keep running around in circles
Several posts ago I addressed Congress
Need to approve a recess nomination
Or it is over
Keep running around circlesWhy do you keep running around in circles
Several posts ago I addressed Congress
Need to approve a recess nomination
Or it is over
Congress doesn't need to approve a recess appointments, if Congress is in recess the President has the Constitutional authority to make a recess appointment.
Congress only needs to confirm permanent appointments.
>>>>>
Keep running around circlesWhy do you keep running around in circles
Several posts ago I addressed Congress
Need to approve a recess nomination
Or it is over
Congress doesn't need to approve a recess appointments, if Congress is in recess the President has the Constitutional authority to make a recess appointment.
Congress only needs to confirm permanent appointments.
>>>>>
LOL
You
Keep running around circlesWhy do you keep running around in circles
Several posts ago I addressed Congress
Need to approve a recess nomination
Or it is over
Congress doesn't need to approve a recess appointments, if Congress is in recess the President has the Constitutional authority to make a recess appointment.
Congress only needs to confirm permanent appointments.
>>>>>
LOL
You
Who's running?
I'm responding with facts and posted multiple sources showing your were incorrect including the Constitution of the United States.
What have you posted besides incorrect statements on the functioning of recess appointment that supported your position that recess appointments end with the Presidency (the don't they end at the next session of Congress) and that Congress has to approve recess appointments (they don't, they confirm permanent appointments)?
>>>>
Yeah keep babbling all you want
At the end of the day the fact
Remains that without approval of Congress
A supreme Court appointment won't last
That is what I said all alongYeah keep babbling all you want
At the end of the day the fact
Remains that without approval of Congress
A supreme Court appointment won't last
Finally, something true. You are correct, a permanent appointment must be confirmed by the Senate and recess appointments end with the Congressional session.
>>>>>