President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

[The T]

Obviously. But the reactionaries get all knee-jerky easily.

It was a joke you clown. My god your sense of humor must be dead too.

Is this how you explain your performance in this thread?

 

[RadiomanATL]

No. Someone mentioned early in that Hitler was nominated for the prize in 1939. Then someone later claimed that he actually won the prize.

All threads get Godwin'ed by page 7 or 8. You know that.

Did they really? If you could me show, so I could point and call them a fucktard.

And that's what I figured. 53 pages to be Godwin'ed is too long.

No way am I going back through all this swill to look for it.

But I do remember Vast LWC is the person who said he won it.

 

[Si modo]

Obviously. But the reactionaries get all knee-jerky easily.

It was a joke you clown. My god your sense of humor must be dead too.

Perhaps. It's hard to tell when you're actually playing stupid or just being yourself.

 

[Modbert]

Is this how you explain your performance in this thread?

Well I thought it was the way you explain yours. Then I just realized you're ignorant to the truth.

Ask women in Afghanistan and Iraq about their so-called rights. Careful though, their husband or male family member right next to them may not like the questions you ask.

 

[mudwhistle]

In those societies? They didn't! Great observation. Our sweat/Blood made it so.

To hear the left? They seem to be outraged. Where are the Women's groups in this countyry that seem to be apparently missing on their sisters over there being oppressed, and the fact that WE gave them the RIGHT to VOTE?

Awesome thought.

Women have no rights in Afghanistan and Iraq in the present. It will only get worse over time until eventually it's business as usual. We did not liberate and we can not liberate until women get rights in these countries. Since they do not have rights, these countries are not liberated.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

 

[elvis]

In those societies? They didn't! Great observation. Our sweat/Blood made it so.

To hear the left? They seem to be outraged. Where are the Women's groups in this countyry that seem to be apparently missing on their sisters over there being oppressed, and the fact that WE gave them the RIGHT to VOTE?

Awesome thought.

Women have no rights in Afghanistan and Iraq in the present. It will only get worse over time until eventually it's business as usual. We did not liberate and we can not liberate until women get rights in these countries. Since they do not have rights, these countries are not liberated.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

did he say anything about the ability to go to school? You may want to address the points he made about women's rights.

 

[mudwhistle]

Is this how you explain your performance in this thread?

Well I thought it was the way you explain yours. Then I just realized you're ignorant to the truth.

Ask women in Afghanistan and Iraq about their so-called rights. Careful though, their husband or male family member right next to them may not like the questions you ask.

I don't understand why anybody wastes their time arguing with this piece of shit.

 

[The T]

In those societies? They didn't! Great observation. Our sweat/Blood made it so.

To hear the left? They seem to be outraged. Where are the Women's groups in this countyry that seem to be apparently missing on their sisters over there being oppressed, and the fact that WE gave them the RIGHT to VOTE?

Awesome thought.

Women have no rights in Afghanistan and Iraq in the present. It will only get worse over time until eventually it's business as usual. We did not liberate and we can not liberate until women get rights in these countries. Since they do not have rights, these countries are not liberated.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

Exactly MY point. Where is the support from the NAGS? Other Women's groups?

NON existant.

 

[DiveCon]

Then gee? Don't you THINK it's a wonderful thing that *WE* afforded them the oppritunity to figure this out for themselves?

What a wonderful thing Liberation *IS*, that they are afforded that oppritunity, rather than "Our WAY of the highway" [DEATH] for even going that direction if it were LEFT to the Taliban?

Again? You demonstrate two-demensional thinking. YES I ad mit to asking you for sources...but the underlying POINT has been because WE were there gave them the oppritunity to question it.

Game, SET, Match.

Thank you for playing.

You'll receive the Home Game instead.

Except we haven't allowed them to figure this out for themselves. It is only due to certain parties stepping in that the questioning has been allowed to occur. We have sat by as we allowed him to steal the election. Women have no rights, once again. This is no different than the Taliban. That is not Liberation.

We also haven't given them the opportunity to truly question it.

I want you to tell me how this is different than the Taliban in terms of rights in Afghanistan for women and in general.

Women have no rights. Go figure. It's the kind of society the people want. It would have happened whether we toppled saddam or the iraqi people overthrew him.

well, women had so many rights in Afghanistan under Taliban rule

 

[elvis]

Women have no rights in Afghanistan and Iraq in the present. It will only get worse over time until eventually it's business as usual. We did not liberate and we can not liberate until women get rights in these countries. Since they do not have rights, these countries are not liberated.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

Exactly MY point. Where is the support from the NAGS? Other Women's groups?

NON existant.

I wondered where those women's groups were when the Lewinsky scandal hit.

 

[Si modo]

Women have no rights in Afghanistan and Iraq in the present. It will only get worse over time until eventually it's business as usual. We did not liberate and we can not liberate until women get rights in these countries. Since they do not have rights, these countries are not liberated.

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

did he say anything about the ability to go to school? You may want to address the points he made about women's rights.

Dogbert was talking about rights. Going to school was not a right for women.

 

[Modbert]

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

A woman serving public office in Afghanistan is about as likely as me being able to swim underwater for 24 hours straight. Neither is going to happen and you know it.

If you refer to the illusion of being able to fill public office, then you be right.

 

[elvis]

You really don't know what you're talking about.

They can go to school, and fill public office.

Both of which they couldn't before Bush....so like I said..you don't know what you're talking about.

did he say anything about the ability to go to school? You may want to address the points he made about women's rights.

Dogbert was talking about rights. Going to school was not a right for women.

Yeah ok. I think the way women are being treated there is a function of their culture, not whether Hussein is in power.

 

[elvis]

Except we haven't allowed them to figure this out for themselves. It is only due to certain parties stepping in that the questioning has been allowed to occur. We have sat by as we allowed him to steal the election. Women have no rights, once again. This is no different than the Taliban. That is not Liberation.

We also haven't given them the opportunity to truly question it.

I want you to tell me how this is different than the Taliban in terms of rights in Afghanistan for women and in general.

Women have no rights. Go figure. It's the kind of society the people want. It would have happened whether we toppled saddam or the iraqi people overthrew him.

well, women had so many rights in Afghanistan under Taliban rule

yeah I can't imagine they would want to be back under Taliban rule.

 

[Coyote]

Then gee? Don't you THINK it's a wonderful thing that *WE* afforded them the oppritunity to figure this out for themselves?

What a wonderful thing Liberation *IS*, that they are afforded that oppritunity, rather than "Our WAY of the highway" [DEATH] for even going that direction if it were LEFT to the Taliban?

Again? You demonstrate two-demensional thinking. YES I ad mit to asking you for sources...but the underlying POINT has been because WE were there gave them the oppritunity to question it.

Game, SET, Match.

Thank you for playing.

You'll receive the Home Game instead.

Except we haven't allowed them to figure this out for themselves. It is only due to certain parties stepping in that the questioning has been allowed to occur. We have sat by as we allowed him to steal the election. Women have no rights, once again. This is no different than the Taliban. That is not Liberation.

We also haven't given them the opportunity to truly question it.

I want you to tell me how this is different than the Taliban in terms of rights in Afghanistan for women and in general.

Women have no rights. Go figure. It's the kind of society the people want. It would have happened whether we toppled saddam or the iraqi people overthrew him.

Under Saddam, the state was secular...seems like women were better off....

 

[elvis]

Except we haven't allowed them to figure this out for themselves. It is only due to certain parties stepping in that the questioning has been allowed to occur. We have sat by as we allowed him to steal the election. Women have no rights, once again. This is no different than the Taliban. That is not Liberation.

We also haven't given them the opportunity to truly question it.

I want you to tell me how this is different than the Taliban in terms of rights in Afghanistan for women and in general.

Women have no rights. Go figure. It's the kind of society the people want. It would have happened whether we toppled saddam or the iraqi people overthrew him.

Under Saddam, the state was secular...seems like women were better off....

Well democracy is the worst form of government until something better comes along.

 

[Modbert]

Yeah ok. I think the way women are being treated there is a function of their culture, not whether Hussein is in power.

Which is exactly my point and what I've been saying here on this board for over a year now.

The battle isn't in the desert wasteland battlegrounds. It's in the classroom. It's in teaching the males of Afghanistan that equality for women is the right thing to do. However, we can't do that since their culture would not allow them such a thing.

As long as their culture is the way it is, women in Afghanistan will never be liberated and always be second class citizens.

 

[The T]

Is this how you explain your performance in this thread?

Well I thought it was the way you explain yours. Then I just realized you're ignorant to the truth.

Ask women in Afghanistan and Iraq about their so-called rights. Careful though, their husband or male family member right next to them may not like the questions you ask.

But they HAVE the right to VOTE...do they not?

This woman would SLAP yer face...

But then you may be hiding your male chauvenistic side, eh?

Or are these people too STUPID for your taste? Or is their Liberty more than you can bear? Well? YOU have yours, don't you?

 

[elvis]

Yeah ok. I think the way women are being treated there is a function of their culture, not whether Hussein is in power.

Which is exactly my point and what I've been saying here on this board for over a year now.

The battle isn't in the desert wasteland battlegrounds. It's in the classroom. It's in teaching the males of Afghanistan that equality for women is the right thing to do. However, we can't do that since their culture would not allow them such a thing.

As long as their culture is the way it is, women in Afghanistan will never be liberated and always be second class citizens.

You're talking about undoing a culture that has been present for thousands of years.

 

[Coyote]

Is this how you explain your performance in this thread?

Well I thought it was the way you explain yours. Then I just realized you're ignorant to the truth.

Ask women in Afghanistan and Iraq about their so-called rights. Careful though, their husband or male family member right next to them may not like the questions you ask.

I don't understand why anybody wastes their time arguing with this piece of shit.

This is just a guess but...maybe because he makes some sense?

Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose....