"Porno" Rick Perry and his "Sexy" past.

This was a goodie..

Is that “Big Tit Brotha Lovers 6”-ugly or “Bisexual Barebacking Vol. 1”-ugly?
It turns out that those are just two of the titles that have been released by Movie Gallery, at one time the largest domestic distributor of pornography in the country. Oddly enough, it turns out that Texas governor and GOP presidential hopeful Rick Perry has invested quite a pretty penny into the porn-pushers.
Rick Perry the Pornographer — RT

Gotta love those titles.

More bullshit from the lying left.

OH HORRORS. HE INVESTED IN A MUTUAL FUND!

He's going to hell for sure.

You lying fuckers are something else, Shallow. Guess it's your desperation at knowing your Messiah® is toast.
 
Of all the things in which to focus on regarding Perry, THIS is a total non-issue.

1. He invested in a company that provided a range of movies up to, and including, porn. As was mentioned, during an age prior to the spankernet.

2. A company which, to my mind, was closer to a mom and pop option than the hordes of blockbusters and the like which likely dominated by standards councils and influenced by organizations like the PMRC.

3. I, for one, won't be a hypocrite about the issue of porn and what we deem pornographic. Teens with Tits? fuck yea, pop it in!

4. Seriously, stop being a disingenuous FUCKCHOP and find any other issue to point at in regards to the failings of Rick Perry.

¿Qué es todo esto lo Fuckchop? Hablando simplemente de mi chico Ricardo Pérez. El hombre es un proxeneta principal que se encuentra abajo con todas las damas moscas. Él es el número uno con una bala con todos los Superflys! Tratando de obtener la palabra socio. No hay necesidad de odio, apreciar!
 
...but, this is a lame criticism of a non-issue. It actually hurts other, valid criticism when silliness like this is paraded around as if it's some big deal. Really, it isn't and the only thing it ends up validating is the criticism of YOUR criticism.

just saying.
 
...but, this is a lame criticism of a non-issue. It actually hurts other, valid criticism when silliness like this is paraded around as if it's some big deal. Really, it isn't and the only thing it ends up validating is the criticism of YOUR criticism.

just saying.

At what point do I or have I held this up as a "big deal"?

It certainly is no show stopper..for any candidate of any party. Bill Clinton was a well known womanizer..and he won handily. Rumors about George HW Bush and his weekends away with his secretary didn't really rate much. And even though John McCain had to shoo away a comely youngin on the campaign trail, people barely noticed.

I just find it hilarious that rightwingers are bible thumpin' while having this guy as numero uno with a bullet at the box office.
 
...but, this is a lame criticism of a non-issue. It actually hurts other, valid criticism when silliness like this is paraded around as if it's some big deal. Really, it isn't and the only thing it ends up validating is the criticism of YOUR criticism.

just saying.

At what point do I or have I held this up as a "big deal"?

It certainly is no show stopper..for any candidate of any party. Bill Clinton was a well known womanizer..and he won handily. Rumors about George HW Bush and his weekends away with his secretary didn't really rate much. And even though John McCain had to shoo away a comely youngin on the campaign trail, people barely noticed.

I just find it hilarious that rightwingers are bible thumpin' while having this guy as numero uno with a bullet at the box office.



you... uh... posted the thread.

Again, bible thumping or not, HE didn't go out and hold the boom mic while Peter North shot a gallon of cum on a fresh 18 year old. He invested money in a company that offered pornographic options to adults who chose to enter the back room. And, most likely, such wasn't even a mitigating factor in his choice to invest!

again, as an arch-liberal I have to say that this tangent hurts more than it helps.


Orgazmo3.jpg
 
...but, this is a lame criticism of a non-issue. It actually hurts other, valid criticism when silliness like this is paraded around as if it's some big deal. Really, it isn't and the only thing it ends up validating is the criticism of YOUR criticism.

just saying.

At what point do I or have I held this up as a "big deal"?

It certainly is no show stopper..for any candidate of any party. Bill Clinton was a well known womanizer..and he won handily. Rumors about George HW Bush and his weekends away with his secretary didn't really rate much. And even though John McCain had to shoo away a comely youngin on the campaign trail, people barely noticed.

I just find it hilarious that rightwingers are bible thumpin' while having this guy as numero uno with a bullet at the box office.



you... uh... posted the thread.

Again, bible thumping or not, HE didn't go out and hold the boom mic while Peter North shot a gallon of cum on a fresh 18 year old. He invested money in a company that offered pornographic options to adults who chose to enter the back room. And, most likely, such wasn't even a mitigating factor in his choice to invest!

again, as an arch-liberal I have to say that this tangent hurts more than it helps.


Orgazmo3.jpg

And?

So?

It's meant to be a silly thread.

This is a message board. Not a news room.
 
...but, this is a lame criticism of a non-issue. It actually hurts other, valid criticism when silliness like this is paraded around as if it's some big deal. Really, it isn't and the only thing it ends up validating is the criticism of YOUR criticism.

just saying.

At what point do I or have I held this up as a "big deal"?

It certainly is no show stopper..for any candidate of any party. Bill Clinton was a well known womanizer..and he won handily. Rumors about George HW Bush and his weekends away with his secretary didn't really rate much. And even though John McCain had to shoo away a comely youngin on the campaign trail, people barely noticed.

I just find it hilarious that rightwingers are bible thumpin' while having this guy as numero uno with a bullet at the box office.

Here's the deal Shallow; it's MY job to mock you morons of the left, yet you are doing more with this kind of bullshit to make a mockery of leftism than I can ever hope to....
 
...but, this is a lame criticism of a non-issue. It actually hurts other, valid criticism when silliness like this is paraded around as if it's some big deal. Really, it isn't and the only thing it ends up validating is the criticism of YOUR criticism.

just saying.

At what point do I or have I held this up as a "big deal"?

It certainly is no show stopper..for any candidate of any party. Bill Clinton was a well known womanizer..and he won handily. Rumors about George HW Bush and his weekends away with his secretary didn't really rate much. And even though John McCain had to shoo away a comely youngin on the campaign trail, people barely noticed.

I just find it hilarious that rightwingers are bible thumpin' while having this guy as numero uno with a bullet at the box office.

Here's the deal Shallow; it's MY job to mock you morons of the left, yet you are doing more with this kind of bullshit to make a mockery of leftism than I can ever hope to....

Kudos.

You are a legend in your own mind.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W52Xq7Vrp2Q]Wayne's World Theme - YouTube[/ame]

Party time.
 
How's Porno Perry doing these days?

Better than Gay Cabaret Barry.

{President Obama's approval rating hit another new low, and Rick Perry has surged to the lead in the 2012 Republican presidential race, according to a NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Tuesday.}

Obama drops, Perry surges in new poll | The Ticket - Yahoo! News

You should read these things..

While Perry appears to be the candidate to beat in the GOP field, he's not as strong as Romney or a "generic" Republican when pitted directly against Obama. According to the poll, Perry would lose to Obama in a projected match-up, 42 percent to 47 percent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top