ScreamingEagle
Gold Member
- Jul 5, 2004
- 13,399
- 1,707
- 245
Poor workers may face an effective higher tax rate than the 1 percenters on their Minimum Wage increases that Obama and the Dims want.....meaning the Government could end up with getting back more than HALF of a poor person's increased minimum wage...nice huh..?
here is an example of a single mother with one child who is making minimum wage...
$2.85/hr....the proposed government increase
-0.24.........loss in EITC (Earned Income Tax Credit)
-0.91.........loss in SNAP benefits (food stamps)
-0.06.........loss in LHEAP benefits (heating help)
-0.22.........higher payroll taxes
_____
$1.42/hr....Single working mom's share
$1.43/hr....Federal government's share.....over 50% of her wage increase taken back....
this does NOT include any increased State income taxes...
OR losing other state or local benefits...
OR the possibility she may lose her Medicaid due to higher income and have to buy Obamacare which means she could possibly be made even poorer than before...
Increasing the minimum wage appears to benefit the Federal government more than the poor worker...is that the real reason why Obama and the Dems are pushing it....?
The minimum wage is an incredibly inefficient way to help the poor because many of the gains go to households that are not in or even near poverty and because the increases in labor costs lead to price increases that must be paid by customers who are often the same low-wage workers supposedly being helped. Still, President Obama has backed that option rather than the seemingly superior policy of increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Obama's Wage 'Compassion' Means Poor Face A Higher Effective Tax Rate Than 1 Percenters - Forbes
here is an example of a single mother with one child who is making minimum wage...
$2.85/hr....the proposed government increase
-0.24.........loss in EITC (Earned Income Tax Credit)
-0.91.........loss in SNAP benefits (food stamps)
-0.06.........loss in LHEAP benefits (heating help)
-0.22.........higher payroll taxes
_____
$1.42/hr....Single working mom's share
$1.43/hr....Federal government's share.....over 50% of her wage increase taken back....
this does NOT include any increased State income taxes...
OR losing other state or local benefits...
OR the possibility she may lose her Medicaid due to higher income and have to buy Obamacare which means she could possibly be made even poorer than before...
Increasing the minimum wage appears to benefit the Federal government more than the poor worker...is that the real reason why Obama and the Dems are pushing it....?
The minimum wage is an incredibly inefficient way to help the poor because many of the gains go to households that are not in or even near poverty and because the increases in labor costs lead to price increases that must be paid by customers who are often the same low-wage workers supposedly being helped. Still, President Obama has backed that option rather than the seemingly superior policy of increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit.
Obama's Wage 'Compassion' Means Poor Face A Higher Effective Tax Rate Than 1 Percenters - Forbes
Last edited: