If she went out of the agreement, she maybe met her standards, but that's far from professional.
From email traffic...she didn’t
And you seen her emails or you're still just repeating what WaPo is saying without any proof actually presented?
Amount of traffic for sure is a sign that she's telling the truth. More emails she sends is proof that she's more honest, right?
Do you think NPR just made up the emails knowing Pompeo could refute them with real emails? Do you ask people putting away umbrellas why they aren't wet if it is raining? Do you hurt yourself with plastic spoons?
I'm sure there are emails in between Kelly and Pompeo's office about setting up the interview and some kind of agreement. I'm also sure there is nothing out of ordinary about those emails.
The problem is that you lefties are saying that Pompeo verbally assaulted her, and screaming there are emails to prove it. Prove what, that interview was set up and it happen?
Existence of interview agreement are not proof he verbally assaulted her, and even if he did, which I doubt, I don't think that anybody would admit anything like that in writing.
Other than that, please tell us, what do you think that emails in between them can prove?